Revision summary
Neo-farmers’ movements fight prices, inputs, and debt after the Green Revolution. They differ from colonial peasant satyagraha against planters. Dominant-caste commercial farmers usually lead. 1991 and fiscal policy are the new antagonists. Landless labour remains at the edge of the slogan.
Model answer
Introduction
Neo-farmers’ movements are post-Green-Revolution agitations of commercially oriented cultivators over prices, costs, and the state. Their dynamics differ from Champaran’s anti-planter peasant fight. They are often richer-peasant unions that still speak as ‘the kisan’.
Body
What is ‘neo’
- Not anti-colonial indigo. Input-output politics: MSP, diesel, power, and debt.
- Leadership from dominant agrarian castes that Srinivas would recognise as locally powerful.
- Methods: roadblocks, rail roko, and city marches, plus media.
Dynamics
- Green Revolution created a class that sells grain and buys the market, then collides with liberalisation after 1991.
- A. R. Desai’s rich peasant sits inside the slogan of all farmers, while labourers and tenants are quieter.
- Regional belts—Punjab, western UP, Maharashtra sugar, and similar—set the national noise.
- Swaminathan-type demands (cost-plus MSP, credit) become movement language.
Limits
- Caste and landless labour rarely lead.
- Urban consumers and fiscal politics constrain victories.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD GR[Green Revolution commercial farm] --> NF[Neo-farmers movement] PR[Price cost debt] --> NF DC[Dominant caste unions] --> NF LB[Labour tenants] --> MR[Margin of the frame]
Conclusion
Neo-farmers’ movements are the politics of commercial agriculture’s squeeze. Dynamics are price, caste-leadership, and spectacular blockade. They are contemporary, not a repeat of Champaran, and they are incomplete as a movement of all rural poor.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Assess the role of the State in promoting education of girl child.
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Are these left movements?
Some use radical language. Class composition is often proprietary peasantry.
-
Do they include women farmers?
Women work the fields. Titles and microphones usually remain male.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Evaluate the nature and scope of anthropogenic influence on Climate in India and also analyze the environmental movements arising out of it. -
2019 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Illustrate the contribution of the Tebhaga Movement to the peasants struggle in India -
2018 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate the 'Me Too' Movement and its impact in India. -
2018 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Elaborate various forms of Dalit assertions in contemporary India? Discuss. -
2017 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
The main objective of socio- religious movement during the colonial rule in India were reforming and synthesizing Hinduism. Write any two such important movements -
2017 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Despite gains from the women's gender movement and states policy of women empowerment, gender equality is far from achieved. Identify two major challenges the prevent this goal from being reached -
2016 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the various forms of environmental movements waged in india. ·. -
2016 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
What are the factors accounting for the resurgence of ethnic identity movements in India?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a note on G.S.Ghurye's Indological perspective of understanding Indian society.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Ghurye’s Indological perspective reads India through texts and Hindu civilisation. Caste and Race listed structural features and rejected a crude race theory. Tribe was treated as a backward Hindu awaiting assimilation. Field sociologists showed living rank and power that books do not fix. Class and minority self-rule further limit the method.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Give a critical analysis of Andre Beteille's study of Tanjore village.
Caste System
Sripuram split caste, class, and power in a Tanjore village. Land reform and democracy made the structure disharmonic. The study corrected harmony functionalism and a fused sacred hierarchy. Limits are Brahmin-centred fieldwork, thin gender, and one-village scale. Use it as a method, not as all of India.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Media is the fourth pillar of democracy. Discuss.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
The fourth-pillar claim is that media watches the three official organs. Speech rights and investigative reporting sometimes fulfil it. Ownership, paid news, and communal frames weaken it. Women, caste, and rural poor are unevenly seen. The phrase is an ideal to enforce, not a fact already achieved.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.