Revision summary
Development projects displace Adivasis from land and forest. Uprising is often the political form of that loss. Narmada dams drowned villages to water the plains. Rehabilitation failed many, especially women without title. Rights before projects are the alternative to manufactured revolt.
Model answer
Introduction
Tribal uprisings in contemporary India are often fights against development that takes land, forest, and gods. Displacement is not a side cost. It is the injury that turns a project into a rebellion. One detailed illustration is the Narmada valley struggle around large dams.
Body
The general link
- Mines, dams, factories, and parks in the central Indian belt treat Adivasi land as empty national property.
- G. S. Ghurye’s Hinduisation-as-integration becomes, on the ground, a police camp and a colony.
- Verrier Elwin’s protection failed when the Forest Department and the dam arrived first.
- Uprising here includes both armed and non-armed refusal: roadblocks, court cases, and sometimes insurgency.
Illustration: Narmada
- Sardar Sarovar and allied dams promised water and power to plains farmers and cities.
- Submergence hit Adivasi and peasant villages in Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Gujarat, breaking grove, kin, and field together.
- The Narmada Bachao Andolan made displacement a national sociological fact: who is ‘developed’, who is drowned.
- Rehabilitation lists lagged; land-for-land was uneven; women lost commons without titles, a Seed-and-Earth outcome in colonies.
- The uprising’s dynamic was moral publicity plus local leadership, not a return to isolation.
What the illustration teaches
- Development-induced displacement produces tribal uprising when consent and PESA/FRA-type rights are skipped.
- A. R. Desai’s path of development is visible: national accumulation on a dispossessed margin.
- One valley does not exhaust Jharkhand mines or Odisha plants, but the structure rhymes.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD PR[Dam mine park] --> DP[Displacement] DP --> UP[Tribal uprising] NV[Narmada illustration] --> DP RT[PESA FRA consent] --> AV[Possible avoidance]
Conclusion
Tribal uprising in the development era is frequently an anti-displacement movement. Narmada shows how a dam reorganises ecology, kinship, and citizenship, and how Adivasi protest becomes the public of that injury. Without land rights first, growth will keep manufacturing revolt.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Illustrate the importance of 'Kanyadaan' and 'Kulavadhu' in changing institution of marriage and family.
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Is every tribal uprising only about dams?
Mines, parks, and land alienation follow the same displacement logic.
-
Does compensation end the issue?
Cash without grove, kin, and livelihood is not restoration. That gap feeds uprising.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How does the New Education Policy, 2020 aim to eradicate disparities in the system of education in India? -
2019 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a note on Ghurye's conception of caste in India -
2019 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
What is POSH Act? "Identification of tormentor by women at workplace does not come easily even today". Examine the statement with substantive examples from India -
2017 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the reason for the escalation of violence against women in the public domain ? -
2016 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Privatization of education and increasing inequalities -
2016 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the emerging forms of 'inequalities' and 'acute poverty' as major challenges of social transformation in India. -
2015 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
What are the major concerns of ethnic identity and religious identity in India? -
2015 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
How serious is the problem of trafficking against women and children in India?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a note on G.S.Ghurye's Indological perspective of understanding Indian society.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Ghurye’s Indological perspective reads India through texts and Hindu civilisation. Caste and Race listed structural features and rejected a crude race theory. Tribe was treated as a backward Hindu awaiting assimilation. Field sociologists showed living rank and power that books do not fix. Class and minority self-rule further limit the method.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Give a critical analysis of Andre Beteille's study of Tanjore village.
Caste System
Sripuram split caste, class, and power in a Tanjore village. Land reform and democracy made the structure disharmonic. The study corrected harmony functionalism and a fused sacred hierarchy. Limits are Brahmin-centred fieldwork, thin gender, and one-village scale. Use it as a method, not as all of India.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Media is the fourth pillar of democracy. Discuss.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
The fourth-pillar claim is that media watches the three official organs. Speech rights and investigative reporting sometimes fulfil it. Ownership, paid news, and communal frames weaken it. Women, caste, and rural poor are unevenly seen. The phrase is an ideal to enforce, not a fact already achieved.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.