Revision summary
Desai treated Indian development as a class path, not a cultural story. Colonialism made a dependent bourgeoisie and a rent-based countryside. Independence did not complete land reform for labourers. Planning aided capital while socialist language covered it. 1991 and displacement continue the uneven path; caste and gender must be added.
Model answer
Introduction
A. R. Desai read India’s development as a class path, not as a cultural awakening. Colonialism created a dependent bourgeoisie. Independence and planning did not complete a popular agrarian revolution. The path is capitalist, state-aided, and uneven.
Body
The path he named
- British rule destroyed older crafts, tied agriculture to export and rent, and grew a bourgeoisie that was not a full industrial transformer.
- The national movement, including peasant episodes such as Champaran, mixed anti-colonial unity with landlord and rich-peasant interests.
- After 1947, land reform was incomplete. Intermediaries fell in law; occupancy peasants and capital-rich farmers captured surplus more than labourers.
Planning and mixed economy
- The state built heavy industry and protected private capital. Desai saw this as bourgeois development with a socialist vocabulary.
- Community Development and village harmony sociology, in his critique, hid class.
- Green Revolution later fitted his map: regional plenty, hired labour, and a new agrarian elite.
Contrast with other Indian sociologists
- M. N. Srinivas’s dominant caste is usable, but Desai insists land and surplus come first.
- Yogendra Singh’s modernisation of tradition is too cultural for this political economy.
- G. S. Ghurye’s Hindu civilisation is not a development theory of classes.
Present applicability
- 1991 liberalisation intensified the capitalist path: new middle class, informal labour, and displacement for projects.
- Farmer debt and tribal mining belts are the unfinished agrarian and Adivasi questions he posed.
Limit
- Caste, gender, and ethnicity need more than class reduction. Use Desai with Ambedkar and Dube, not instead of them.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD COL[Colonial dependent bourgeoisie] --> IND[Incomplete land reform] IND --> PL[Planning plus private capital] PL --> UE[Uneven growth labour surplus] CST[Caste gender] --> LM[Limit of class-only]
Conclusion
- Desai’s path of development is an incomplete bourgeois-national capitalism: colonial origin, limited land reform, state-supported private accumulation, and persistent rural poverty. Analyse it as a class diagnosis that still explains uneven India, and complete it with caste and gender.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Examine sociological dynamics of Champaran Peasant Movement in colonial India.
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q2). View answer →
-
Did Desai deny nationalism?
He analysed its class limits. He did not treat the anti-colonial fight as unreal.
-
Is 1991 a break from his path?
It is a shift of gear on the same capitalist road, with a thinner planning shield.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a note on G.S.Ghurye's Indological perspective of understanding Indian society. -
2018 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Media is the fourth pillar of democracy. Discuss. -
2018 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
How do the recommendations of Swaminathan Commissions (2004-2006) ensure food and nutrition security for the Indian masses? -
2018 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
What do you understand by discrete castes and muddled hierarchies? Substantiate your answer with suitable illustrations. -
2018 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the issues relating to the entitlement of transgender in Indian society. -
2018 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate the concept of constitutional morality as given by B.R.Ambedkar. -
2018 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Assess the role of the State in promoting education of girl child. -
2018 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
With increase in education and economic development is Indian society becoming more secular.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a note on G.S.Ghurye's Indological perspective of understanding Indian society.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Ghurye’s Indological perspective reads India through texts and Hindu civilisation. Caste and Race listed structural features and rejected a crude race theory. Tribe was treated as a backward Hindu awaiting assimilation. Field sociologists showed living rank and power that books do not fix. Class and minority self-rule further limit the method.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Give a critical analysis of Andre Beteille's study of Tanjore village.
Caste System
Sripuram split caste, class, and power in a Tanjore village. Land reform and democracy made the structure disharmonic. The study corrected harmony functionalism and a fused sacred hierarchy. Limits are Brahmin-centred fieldwork, thin gender, and one-village scale. Use it as a method, not as all of India.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Media is the fourth pillar of democracy. Discuss.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
The fourth-pillar claim is that media watches the three official organs. Speech rights and investigative reporting sometimes fulfil it. Ownership, paid news, and communal frames weaken it. Women, caste, and rural poor are unevenly seen. The phrase is an ideal to enforce, not a fact already achieved.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.