Q1(e) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q1 Q2 →

Patriarchy as a form of dominance.

Topic: Perspectives on the study of Indian society. Syllabus: Perspectives on the study of Indian society: Indology (G.S. Ghurye); Structural functionalism (M.N. Srinivas); Marxist sociology (A.R. Desai). Same official PYQ from year-wise 2016 and Perspectives on the study of Indian society.

Revision summary

Patriarchy dominates by controlling descent, property, and women’s sexuality. Seed and Earth is the Indian kinship code of that dominance. Brahmanical patriarchy ties it to caste honour. Law can proclaim equality while the household still ranks the father. It is structural dominance, not only prejudice.

Model answer

Introduction

Patriarchy is dominance through the organisation of kinship, sexuality, and labour so that men command line and surplus. In India it is a caste form of dominance, not a free-standing male culture.

Body

As dominance

  • Leela Dube’s Seed and Earth makes men the seed and women the field; dominance is the right to name the child and guard the body.
  • Uma Chakravarti’s Brahmanical patriarchy shows honour as caste power over women.
  • Property, vote by household head, and unpaid care are material dominance, which Walby would split into structures.

Not only the home

  • The state, temple, and informal labour market extend it. Informal women workers meet patriarchy as wage theft plus honour.
  • Beteille’s disharmony: the Constitution names equality while the lineage names the father.

Variation

  • Class and some matrilineal pockets change the mix. Dominance remains the pattern in much of the North Indian belt.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  P[Patriarchy] --> S[Seed line property]
  P --> H[Honour sexuality]
  C[Caste] --> P

Conclusion

Patriarchy is a form of dominance because it allocates voice, land, and body. Indian sociology must treat it as kinship-caste power, not as private attitude.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2016 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Salient features of A.R. Desai's Marxist Sociology

    View answer →

  2. 2016 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Elucidate the concepts of 'majoritarianism' and 'minoritarianism' in accentuating communal tensions in India.

    View answer →

  3. 2016 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Comment on the increasing significance of caste in politics.

    View answer →

  4. 2016 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Different forms of Dalit assertion

    View answer →

  5. 2016 · Q4(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Empowerment through 'Right to Education'

    View answer →

  6. 2016 · Q4(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Differential sex-ratio and its implications.

    View answer →

  7. 2016 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Bring out the impact of the declining significance of the agrarian economy.

    View answer →

  8. 2016 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    How is ageing becoming an emerging issue in Indian society ?

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

Salient features of A.R. Desai's Marxist Sociology

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

Desai applied Marxism to nation, agrarian structure, and the Indian state. Nationalism is read as a bourgeois project in a colonial economy. Village harmony is rejected for landlord–peasant–labour relations. The state and planning are class instruments, not neutral tools. Caste is real but not the first mover in his scheme.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

Significance of Village Studies in Indian Sociology

Rural and Agrarian Social Structure

Village studies established the field view against book-view Indology. Rampura and Sripuram supplied core concepts of Indian sociology. They linked caste to land, faction, and later to class and power. They shaped policy talk about rural change. Migration and gender gaps now bound their claim to represent India.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

'Isolationism' as a dominant feature of colonial tribal policy

Tribal communities in India

Colonial policy used excluded areas and inner lines as isolation. The aim mixed protection of custom with forest and frontier control. Isolation was never total; markets and missions entered. Elwin inherited protection; Ghurye attacked it as stagnation. Schedules today still carry this spatial exception.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.