Revision summary
Anthropological functionalism treated customs as serving a unified whole. Merton rejected unity, universal function, and indispensability. He offered manifest/latent, dysfunction, and alternatives. Latent functions fail when unfalsifiable, when they hide whose order is served, and when they freeze change. Gendered unpaid labour can be misread as latent family stability. Use as hypothesis, not as a blessing of every custom.
Model answer
Introduction
Social anthropologists such as Bronislaw Malinowski and A. R. Radcliffe-Brown treated items of culture as serving the whole of a small society. Robert K. Merton reacted by cutting that grand functionalism down. He kept function as a tool and named its overclaims, including the limits of latent functions.
Body
Anthropological functionalism as Merton met it
- Malinowski tied customs to individual needs. Radcliffe-Brown tied them to the persistence of the social structure.
- Both leaned toward a postulate of universal functionalism: every item serves the system.
- Small-scale, relatively bounded societies made the whole look obvious.
Merton’s reactions
- He rejected three postulates: functional unity of the whole, universal functionalism, and functional indispensability.
- Complex, conflictual societies, which Karl Marx had already stressed, cannot be read as one clan.
- He introduced manifest and latent functions, dysfunctions, and functional alternatives.
- Middle-range theory replaced a theory of everything. The Hopi rain dance could bind without making rain.
What he kept
- The question “what does this practice do?” remains. Veblen’s conspicuous consumption is a latent-status function.
Limitations of latent functions
- The observer may invent a hidden use. Latent function can become an unfalsifiable story.
- Unanticipated consequences are not automatically functions. A leak may only harm.
- Conflict: whose system is served? Caste ritual may integrate the dominant and exclude others.
- Gender: latent “stability” of the family can be unpaid female labour, which Ann Oakley made visible.
- Static bias: explaining persistence underplays change and power, which later conflict theory pressed.
Balance
- Use latent functions as hypotheses about hidden contributions.
- Demand evidence, name dysfunctions, and specify the unit: group, class, or society.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD ANT[Malinowski Radcliffe-Brown] --> WHOLE[Item serves whole] MER[Merton] --> CUT[No unity no indispensability] MER --> LAT[Latent function] LAT --> LIM[Invented use domination stasis]
Conclusion
Merton reacted to anthropological functionalism by dropping unity, universality, and indispensability, and by splitting manifest from latent. Latent functions are limited when they excuse domination, invent uses, or freeze conflict. Keep the tool; bind it with dysfunction, alternatives, and a named beneficiary.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How are Hierarchy and Exclusion the major impediments in the transformation of societies ? Discuss.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q2). View answer →
-
Did Merton abandon function?
No. He localised it and allowed dysfunction and alternatives.
-
Is every unintended effect latent-functional?
No. That collapse is the main limitation. Show the system use, or call it a consequence only.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
'Ideal Types of Max Weber are mental constructs, they do not correspond to the reality. Give your views. -
2020 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyse the relevance of 'Pattern variables' in the study of social change. -
2020 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Capitalism has brought increasing informalisation of work in society.Substantiate your answer. -
2020 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the consequences of Across Region marriage on kinship system in modern Indian society. -
2020 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How does Marx view social conflict as an essential element in social change? -
2020 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
What is the impact of gender division of labour on the development of society? -
2019 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Present a sociological review on the 'new middle class' -
2019 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What, according to Merton, is the difference between 'unanticipated consequences' and 'latent functions' ? Give examples to elaborate
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How did the intellectual forces lead to the emergence of sociology ?Discuss.
Sociology
Intellectual forces made society worldly, comparable, and criticisable. Montesquieu, Smith, Rousseau, and Comte prepared comparison, market, inequality, and a named science. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber filled the space with class, social facts, and action. Nisbet’s conservative problems also fed the tradition. Ideas licensed the discipline; industry made it urgent.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is sociology a value-free science ? Discuss.
Sociology as Science
Weber: value-relevance in questions; value-discipline in proof. Marx, Gouldner, and Harding reject a personless science. Oakley: the interview is already a moral relation. Census categories carry values into counts. Verdict: not value-free; yes to disciplined demonstration.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Methodology is a system of rules, principles and procedures, which forms. scientific investigation. Comment.
Sociology as Science
Methodology is a system of principles, rules, and procedures. It forms scientific investigation by making claims checkable. Durkheim and Weber wrote method as discipline. Blumer and feminist standpoint show theory inside procedure. Census and NFHS are procedures, not theory-free machines.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.