Revision summary
Mobility: movement across class, status, or power. Closed systems: birth, endogamy, honour; Sanskritisation as group style. Open systems: achievement ideology and actual status attainment. Critique: Bourdieu, gender, caste, and class close the open school. Measure tables; do not trust the label.
Model answer
Introduction
Social mobility is movement across ranks of class, status, or power. Pitirim Sorokin distinguished vertical and horizontal, individual and group. Closed systems tie rank to birth. Open systems tie it to achievement. Real societies mix, so assessment must be critical.
Body
Closed systems
- Caste, estate, and racial caste-like orders restrict marriage and occupation.
- M. N. Srinivas’s Sanskritisation is group mobility of style, not an open individual market.
- Max Weber’s status closure explains how honour survives a wage.
Open systems
- Industrial class societies promise school-to-job mobility. Peter Blau and Otis Dudley Duncan measured status attainment.
- The promise is never pure. Pierre Bourdieu’s cultural capital closes the “open” school.
Critical assessment
- India: reservations open some doors; endogamy and informal labour close others. Census education tables show both.
- Gender: women’s mobility through jobs can coexist with hypergamy rules. NFHS still maps constrained movement.
- Openness can be ideological, as Davis and Moore’s functionalism made unequal reward look necessary.
- Karl Marx: even open markets rest on a class that is hard to leave across generations.
Verdict
- Closed and open are poles. Mobility exists in both, of different kinds.
- Assessment: measure intergenerational tables, then name the closures that the word “open” hides.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CL[Closed] --> ASC[Ascription endogamy] OP[Open] --> ACH[School market] ASC --> GM[Group style mobility] ACH --> REP[Bourdieu reproduction] MIX[Real societies] --> CL MIX --> OP
Conclusion
Closed systems restrict individual vertical mobility and allow some group mimicry. Open systems increase occupational movement and still reproduce class, caste, and gender through school and honour. Sorokin, Weber, Bourdieu, and Srinivas are the assessment kit. Do not take the label “open” as a completed fact.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
In the context of globalisation, has the scope of sociology been changing India ? Comment.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Is any society fully closed?
Ideal-typically caste. Empirically there are leaks. The type still organises marriage.
-
Does more education mean an open system?
It can raise absolute schooling and still keep relative class odds sticky.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critically examine Max Weber's theory of Social Stratification. -
2021 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Explain the concept of social mobility. Describe with suitable illustrations how education and social mobility are related to each other -
2021 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the emerging challenges in establishing gender equality in the informal sector -
2020 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
How are Hierarchy and Exclusion the major impediments in the transformation of societies ? Discuss. -
2019 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Davis and Moore made it clear that social stratification is a functional necessity and also an unconscious device. Discuss -
2019 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Modernization presupposes class society; however caste, ethnicity and race are still predominant. Explain -
2019 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Why is gender dimension of social stratification ? How does gender intersect other dimensions of inequality based on caste, class, race and ethnicity ? -
2018 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the difference between natural and social inequality examples from caste and class dimensions
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How did the intellectual forces lead to the emergence of sociology ?Discuss.
Sociology
Intellectual forces made society worldly, comparable, and criticisable. Montesquieu, Smith, Rousseau, and Comte prepared comparison, market, inequality, and a named science. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber filled the space with class, social facts, and action. Nisbet’s conservative problems also fed the tradition. Ideas licensed the discipline; industry made it urgent.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is sociology a value-free science ? Discuss.
Sociology as Science
Weber: value-relevance in questions; value-discipline in proof. Marx, Gouldner, and Harding reject a personless science. Oakley: the interview is already a moral relation. Census categories carry values into counts. Verdict: not value-free; yes to disciplined demonstration.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Methodology is a system of rules, principles and procedures, which forms. scientific investigation. Comment.
Sociology as Science
Methodology is a system of principles, rules, and procedures. It forms scientific investigation by making claims checkable. Durkheim and Weber wrote method as discipline. Blumer and feminist standpoint show theory inside procedure. Census and NFHS are procedures, not theory-free machines.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.