Revision summary
Closed systems restrict mobility by birth and marriage. Sanskritisation is group status mobility in caste research. Mandal routes are political mobility. Hypergamy can move women without opening the group. Leaks do not equal an open class contest.
Model answer
Introduction
Closed systems tie rank to birth and police marriage. Mobility is restricted, not always zero. Research shows group mimicry, political routes, and rare individual leaks rather than a free contest.
Body
Closure as the rule
- Caste and estate approximate closed systems: ascription, endogamy, and honour.
- Max Weber’s status group is the mechanism of closure inside a market.
Research illustrations
- M. N. Srinivas’s Sanskritisation: a caste group raises style and claim, which is collective status mobility, not open class circulation.
- Mandal-era OBC politics: mobility through the state, which Andre Beteille read as mixing class, status, and power.
- Louis Dumont stressed holism; empirical village studies still found some occupation shift at the edges.
- Gendered hypergamy moves women as persons without opening the caste for men of the lower group.
Answer
- Possible as limited, often group and political, mobility.
- Not possible as equal contest mobility of the liberal school myth.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CL[Closed ascription] --> LIM[Limited mobility] LIM --> SAN[Sanskritisation] LIM --> POL[Reservations party] LIM --> NOT[Not contest of all]
Conclusion
Closed systems allow some mobility of groups, styles, and political quotas. Srinivas and Mandal research illustrate that. They do not become open class systems by those leaks.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the nature of social organization of work in capitalist society with reference to the Limits of the working day.
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
If a Dalit becomes an IAS officer, is caste open?
A person moved. Endogamy and honour can still close the system for the many.
-
Is any mobility proof of an open system?
No. Openness is about typical chances, not about exceptions.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2019 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Davis and Moore made it clear that social stratification is a functional necessity and also an unconscious device. Discuss -
2019 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Modernization presupposes class society; however caste, ethnicity and race are still predominant. Explain -
2019 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Why is gender dimension of social stratification ? How does gender intersect other dimensions of inequality based on caste, class, race and ethnicity ? -
2018 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the difference between natural and social inequality examples from caste and class dimensions -
2017 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What is Weberian critique of Marxist notion of social stratification -
2017 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Examine gender. Ethnicity and race as major dimensions of social stratification -
2016 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
"Vertical mobility brings structural change even in a closed social system." Comment -
2016 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Elucidate the basic premises of Davis' structural-functional theory of social stratification. How far is it relevant in understanding contemporary Indian society.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The focal point of sociology rests on interaction. How do you distinguish it from common sense?
Sociology
Sociology focuses on interaction as action oriented to others. Weber, Mead, and Goffman named that object. Common sense is Schutz’s unexamined stock of typifications. Durkheim’s rates and caste studies show why everyday talk is not enough. Sociology uses common-sense language and then tests it.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Distinguish between fact and value in Weber's Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Weber split value-relevance of the problem from value-discipline in proof. The question of modern capitalism is culturally selected. The claimed fact is elective affinity with inner-worldly asceticism. Ideal types organise the comparison. The book does not preach Calvinism as a duty.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Do you think T and Me are central terms in Mead's work
Sociology
Yes: I and Me are central in Mead. Me is the organised attitudes of others, the self as object. I is the unpredictable response that allows novelty. Play, game, and generalised other form the Me. Blumer’s interactionism inherits the pair.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.