Revision summary
Marx: stratification as class relation to production, with polarisation. Weber: class as market situation, plus status honour and party power. The critique targets economic reduction and two-camp history. Caste and bureaucracy illustrate status and staff interests. Class is kept, not deleted.
Model answer
Introduction
Karl Marx tied stratification to class as a relation to the means of production, with polarisation as the historical tendency. Max Weber kept class as market situation and added status and party. The critique is that economic class does not exhaust honour and power.
Body
Marx’s notion, as Weber read it
- Class is defined by ownership and surplus extraction. Two great camps tend to form.
- Status and politics are, in the last instance, shaped by the economic structure.
- Ideology veils that structure.
Weber’s three orders
- Class: shared market chances in goods, labour, and credit, including the propertyless who still differ by skill.
- Status: social honour, style of life, and restricted interaction, often through marriage. Caste is a status order of a severe type.
- Party: organised power in associations and the state, which can cut across class.
The critique
- Polarisation misses the middle classes, petty owners, and credentialed employees.
- Status can block market equality, as Jewish pariah groups or Indian caste show.
- The state and parties are not mere instruments of a single class. Bureaucracy has its own staff interests.
- Multiple causation replaces a last-instance economic key.
Indian bearing
- Andre Beteille used Weber to separate class, status, and power in caste villages.
- Mandal politics is party and status as well as class.
- Informal labour is a class situation that still carries caste honour at the worksite.
What Weber did not erase
- He still treated property as decisive for many life chances. The critique is against reduction, not against class.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD MARX[Marx class production] --> POL[Polarisation] WEB[Weber] --> CL[Class market] WEB --> ST[Status honour] WEB --> PA[Party power] ST --> CRIT[Critique of reduction]
Conclusion
Weber criticises Marxist stratification by splitting class, status, and party, and by refusing polarisation as the whole story. Caste, honour, and organised power can organise inequality beside the market. Class remains; it is no longer the only axis.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Examine gender. Ethnicity and race as major dimensions of social stratification
Next question in the 2017 paper (Q4). View answer →
-
Did Weber deny exploitation?
He analysed market power and domination. He did not use surplus value as Marx did.
-
Is caste only status?
It is a status order that also shapes class chances and party blocs.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the difference between natural and social inequality examples from caste and class dimensions -
2018 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
In social mobility possible in closed systems of stratification ? Illustrate from research work. -
2017 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Examine gender. Ethnicity and race as major dimensions of social stratification -
2016 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
"Vertical mobility brings structural change even in a closed social system." Comment -
2016 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Elucidate the basic premises of Davis' structural-functional theory of social stratification. How far is it relevant in understanding contemporary Indian society. -
2016 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the relationship between poverty and social exclusion -
2015 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
"No society can either be completely open or completely closed." comment. -
2015 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Differentiate between Maxian and Weberian theories of Social stratification.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain how sociology has emerged as a distinct discipline based on rationality and scientific tamper
Sociology
Sociology arose as a science of society after industry and revolution. Comte named it; Durkheim, Marx, and Weber gave it method and objects. Rationality is both a method and, in Weber, a historical process. Scientific temper uses comparison, rates, and social facts. The Census later became a public file for that temper.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine ethnomethodological and phenomenological perspective as critique of positivism
Sociology as Science
Positivism measures external facts; these perspectives study meaning and members’ methods. Schutz described the everyday life-world of typifications. Garfinkel showed order as accomplished, indexical work. Berger and Luckmann treated institutions as objectivated meanings. The critique qualifies rates; it does not delete official files.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2017 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Illustrate with example the significance of variable in sociology research
Sociology as Science
A variable is a concept with more than one comparable value. It states relations and forces operational definition. Durkheim’s suicide rates illustrate theoretically named variables. Census and NFHS work variables can hide unpaid care if poorly coded. Blumer’s warning is part of the significance, not a footnote.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.