Q3(a) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks · 2 min read

← Q2 Q3 →

Why is random sampling said to have more reliability and validity in research?

Topic: Research Methods and Analysis. Syllabus: Research Methods and Analysis: Qualitative and quantitative methods; Techniques of data collection; Variables, sampling, hypothesis, reliability and validity. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2015 and Research Methods and Analysis.

Revision summary

Random sampling gives known chances of selection from a frame. It raises reliability through repeatable rules and estimable variance. It raises validity for population totals by cutting convenience bias. It is not random assignment and not a guarantee of construct validity. NFHS and NSS illustrate the gain; hidden groups and meaning studies still need other designs.

Model answer

Introduction

Random sampling gives each unit in a defined population a known, non-zero chance of selection. It is praised for reliability and validity because it reduces selection bias and supports inference from sample to population. It is not a magic wand for every sociological question.

Body

What random sampling is

  • Simple random, systematic, stratified, and cluster designs are probability designs when the chance is known.
  • A sampling frame, such as a Census list or a household listing for NFHS, is the practical condition.

Reliability

  • Reliability is consistency of a procedure. Random rules can be repeated by another team with the same frame, which interviewer whim cannot.
  • Variance can be estimated. Quotas and convenience samples hide that uncertainty.
  • Stratification, as in rural–urban or sex cells, can raise precision for the same size, which is a reliability gain in the estimate.

Validity of inference

  • External validity of a population estimate is stronger when non-coverage and non-response are managed. Random selection attacks the first bias of picking friends.
  • Internal validity of a causal claim is a different issue. Random sampling is not random assignment. Emile Durkheim’s suicide study was not a random sample of persons, yet it still reasoned about rates.
  • Construct validity still depends on concepts. Max Weber’s meaning is not guaranteed by a random draw of poorly worded items.

Why the claim is only “more”

  • Hidden populations, as in some informal labour, have no frame. Snowballing may be more valid for that object.
  • George Herbert Mead’s interaction studies need cases, not a national percentage.
  • Robert K. Merton’s middle-range work can use both: a probability survey for rates, a case for mechanism.
  • Indian official practice: Census as frame-maker, NSS and NFHS as probability household surveys. Caste-association office networks still need other designs.

Limits to advertise

  • Non-response, outdated frames, and clustered designs that ignore design effects produce false precision.
  • A random sample of households can still miss women’s work if the questionnaire is androcentric, as Ann Oakley-type critiques show.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  FRAME[Sampling frame] --> RS[Random selection]
  RS --> REL[Repeatable estimates]
  RS --> VAL[Population inference]
  REL --> RATE[Rates Census NFHS]
  HIDDEN[No frame] --> OTHER[Purposive snowball]

Conclusion

Random sampling has more reliability as a repeatable selection rule and more validity for population inference because chance, not convenience, chooses cases. It does not by itself validate meaning, causation, or a bad concept. Use it for rates; do not use it as a certificate for every method.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Differentiate between Maxian and Weberian theories of Social stratification.

    Next question in the 2015 paper (Q3). View answer →

  • Is a large convenience sample almost random?

    No. Size without a chance mechanism repeats the same bias more loudly.

  • Does random sampling make research scientific?

    It makes one kind of inference stronger. Theory, measurement, and ethics still decide the rest.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2021 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    How do qualitative and quantitative methods supplement each other in sociological enquiry?

    View answer →

  2. 2020 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Discuss the importance and sources of hypothesis in social research.

    View answer →

  3. 2018 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Distinguish between qualitative techniques of data collection with suitable examples from Indian society.

    View answer →

  4. 2017 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Examine epistemological foundation of qualitative methods of social research

    View answer →

  5. 2017 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    How can one resolve the issue of reliability and validity in the context of sociological research on inequality ?

    View answer →

  6. 2016 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Analyze the importance of qualitative methods in social research

    View answer →

  7. 2016 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    "Hypothesis is a statement of the relationship between two or more variables."Elucidate by giving example of poverty and illiteracy.

    View answer →

  8. 2015 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    What are variables? Discuss their role in experimental research.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

Is sociology a science? Give reasons for your answer.

Sociology as Science

Sociology is a science of patterned social relations, not a physics of persons. Comte, Durkheim, and Marx claimed laws, facts, and historical regularities. Weber, Mead, and Merton add meaning, interaction, and middle-range theory. The claim holds as systematic social science, not as laboratory naturalism.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

Discuss the relevance of historical method in the study of society.

Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx

Historical method treats institutions as dated products, not as timeless attitudes. Marx, Weber, and Durkheim all needed sequences of production, domination, and solidarity. Indian caste, law, and Census household forms show path dependence. It situates survey and ethnography; it is not a substitute for them.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

What are variables? Discuss their role in experimental research.

Research Methods and Analysis

A variable is a property with more than one value. Experiments isolate an independent condition and measure a dependent outcome, with controls. Durkheim and Merton already thought in relations among variables. Weber and Mead limit a stimulus–response reading of persons. Most sociology uses quasi-experiments and surveys, not a closed lab.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.