Q1(e) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q1 Q2 →

"No society can either be completely open or completely closed." comment.

Topic: Stratification and Mobility: Concepts. Syllabus: Stratification and Mobility: Concepts — equality, inequality, hierarchy, exclusion, poverty and deprivation; Theories of social stratification — Structural functionalist, Marxist, Weberian; Dimensions — Class, status groups, gender, ethnicity and race; Social mobility — open and closed systems, types, sources and causes. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2015 and Stratification and Mobility: Concepts.

Revision summary

Open and closed are poles, not photographs of whole societies. Caste and estate leak; markets still close by status, property, and gender. Marx, Weber, Sorokin, and Srinivas describe mixed mobility. Comment: name channels, do not choose an extreme type as the whole.

Model answer

Introduction

Open and closed name poles of mobility and membership. A completely open society would recruit every office by talent alone. A completely closed one would freeze every rank by birth. Empirical societies sit between the poles.

Body

Why complete closure fails

  • Even caste and estate leak: conversion, conquest, adoption, and M. N. Srinivas’s Sanskritisation move groups inside a ranked order.
  • Karl Marx noted circulation of persons beside persistence of class places. A closed idiom still has some movement.

Why complete openness fails

  • Max Weber’s status groups close interaction and marriage even in markets. Education and property sponsor some and exclude others.
  • Pitirim Sorokin treated mobility as a variable of systems, not as a switch to a frictionless contest.
  • Gender and unpaid care, as Ann Oakley showed, close “open” labour markets. NFHS and work data still show that closure.

Comment

  • The statement is a warning against textbook extremes. India mixes ascription, exams, reservations, and informal labour.
  • Measure both the person’s move and the durability of the hierarchy.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  OP[Open achievement] --> MIX[Empirical mix]
  CL[Closed ascription] --> MIX
  MIX --> MOB[Some persons move]
  MIX --> STR[Structure may hold]

Conclusion

No society is a perfect contest or a sealed box. Weber, Marx, Sorokin, and Srinivas all describe mixed closure. The useful task is to name which channels open and which honour rules still shut.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Discuss the role of Calvinist ethic in the development of Capitalism.

    Next question in the 2015 paper (Q2). View answer →

  • Is industrial society therefore open?

    More channels exist. Sponsorship, property, and status still block a complete contest.

  • Does reservation prove closure?

    It uses birth categories to open offices. That is mixed politics, not a sealed caste cosmos.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2018 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    What is the difference between natural and social inequality examples from caste and class dimensions

    View answer →

  2. 2018 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    In social mobility possible in closed systems of stratification ? Illustrate from research work.

    View answer →

  3. 2017 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    What is Weberian critique of Marxist notion of social stratification

    View answer →

  4. 2017 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Examine gender. Ethnicity and race as major dimensions of social stratification

    View answer →

  5. 2016 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    "Vertical mobility brings structural change even in a closed social system." Comment

    View answer →

  6. 2016 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Elucidate the basic premises of Davis' structural-functional theory of social stratification. How far is it relevant in understanding contemporary Indian society.

    View answer →

  7. 2016 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Discuss the relationship between poverty and social exclusion

    View answer →

  8. 2015 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Differentiate between Maxian and Weberian theories of Social stratification.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

Is sociology a science? Give reasons for your answer.

Sociology as Science

Sociology is a science of patterned social relations, not a physics of persons. Comte, Durkheim, and Marx claimed laws, facts, and historical regularities. Weber, Mead, and Merton add meaning, interaction, and middle-range theory. The claim holds as systematic social science, not as laboratory naturalism.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

Discuss the relevance of historical method in the study of society.

Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx

Historical method treats institutions as dated products, not as timeless attitudes. Marx, Weber, and Durkheim all needed sequences of production, domination, and solidarity. Indian caste, law, and Census household forms show path dependence. It situates survey and ethnography; it is not a substitute for them.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

What are variables? Discuss their role in experimental research.

Research Methods and Analysis

A variable is a property with more than one value. Experiments isolate an independent condition and measure a dependent outcome, with controls. Durkheim and Merton already thought in relations among variables. Weber and Mead limit a stimulus–response reading of persons. Most sociology uses quasi-experiments and surveys, not a closed lab.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.