Q1(b) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2026 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks · 2 min read

← Q1(a) Q1(d) →

Extractive capitalism.

Page facts
Exam
Union Public Service Commission — Civil Services Examination (UPSC)
Board
UPSC
Stage
Mains
Year
2026
Paper
UPSC Mains — PSIR GS 2 (Paper II) (PSIR GS 2)
Question
Q1(b)
Marks
10
Topic
Comparative Politics
Syllabus
Comparative Politics: Nature and major approaches; political economy and political sociology perspectives; limitations of the comparative method.

Topic: Comparative Politics. Syllabus: Comparative Politics: Nature and major approaches; political economy and political sociology perspectives; limitations of the comparative method. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2026 and Comparative Politics.

Revision summary

Extractive capitalism defines an accumulation model focused on large-scale extraction of natural resources and raw materials primarily for export and global market integration. Driven by transnational corporations and global financial capital, it often bypasses domestic value addition and deepens unequal core-periphery relations. In developing states, this model frequently leads to resource curses, environmental degradation, and severe agrarian or indigenous displacement. State-society relations become strained as governments prioritize foreign capital inflows over local welfare and democratic dissent. Consequently, it perpetuates global North-South structural dependencies and reinforces unequal ecological exchange in contemporary international relations.

Model answer

Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.

Introduction

Extractive capitalism refers to an economic accumulation regime characterized by the large-scale extraction of natural resources, minerals, and agricultural commodities primarily for export. Rooted in historical patterns of unequal exchange, this contemporary global model deeply impacts state sovereignty, domestic resource governance, and North-South political dynamics.

Body

Theoretical Foundations and Core Features

Extractive capitalism operates through the intensive capitalization of nature, prioritizing rapid primary resource extraction over diversified industrial growth.

  • Capital Accumulation: Driven by transnational corporations (TNCs) and global financial circuits seeking high-yield primary commodities.
  • Enclave Economy: Creates isolated high-tech extraction hubs with minimal backward and forward linkages to the domestic economy.
  • Unequal Ecological Exchange: Transfers ecological liabilities and environmental degradation to the global South while exporting surplus value to the global North.

Impact on State Sovereignty and Governance

Developing states embedded in extractive models often experience weakened institutional capacity and compromised resource governance.

  • Resource Curse Paradox: Abundant natural wealth correlates with sluggish diversified growth, fiscal volatility, and macroeconomic vulnerability.
  • Fiscal-Military States: Governments often rely on resource rents rather than taxation, diminishing accountability and democratic responsiveness.
  • Regulatory Capture: Transnational extractive lobbies frequently weaken domestic environmental and labor standards.

Socio-Ecological Crises and Resistance

The expansion of extractive frontiers directly threatens local livelihoods, indigenous communities, and social stability.

  • Displacement and Land Grabbing: Large-scale mining and agribusiness dispossess rural, tribal, and pastoral communities.
  • Socio-Environmental Conflict: Protests against ecological degradation are frequently met with state repression or criminalization of dissent.
  • Alternative Frameworks: Promotes indigenous demands for buen vivir and sovereignty over ancestral territories against corporate encroachment.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  A[Global Capital -->|Investment| B[Extractive Enclave]
  TNCs] -->|Investment| B[Extractive Enclave]
  B -->|Raw Materials Export| C[Global North Core]
  B -->|Resource Rents| D[Developing State Elite]
  D -->|Fiscal Dependence| E[Weak Accountability]
  B -->|Ecological Costs| F[Local Dispossession]
  F -->|Resistance| G[Socio-Political Conflict]

Conclusion

Extractive capitalism remains a critical structural impediment to equitable global development and ecological sustainability. Addressing its impacts requires moving beyond primary commodity dependence toward diversified industrialization, regional value chains, and robust multilateral environmental governance anchored in the right to self-determination.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Clientilism.

    Next question on this syllabus topic (2026 · Q1(d)). View answer →

  • What is extractive capitalism in political economy?

    It is an accumulation model centered on the intensive exploitation and export of natural resources by global capital, often leading to underdevelopment.

  • How does extractive capitalism affect developing countries?

    It often results in enclave economies, environmental degradation, fiscal vulnerability, and severe social conflicts over land and resources.

More from this topic

Q7(a) · UPSC Mains 2026 · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks · Solution

How does illegal cross border migration pose challenges to India's security? Discuss the steps taken by the government in this direction and their effectiveness

Comparative Politics

Illegal cross-border migration undermines India's national security by altering demographic balances, straining economic resources, and exacerbating internal security vulnerabilities. The government has responded through border fencing, technological integration like SMART fencing, institutional mechanisms, and bilateral agreements. However, porous terrain, regional political complexities, and local connivance limit the complete effectiveness of these measures. A holistic approach combining strict border management with socio-economic development and robust legal frameworks is essential for sustainable containment.

Q5(d) · UPSC Mains 2026 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks · Solution

Discuss the main features of the land-boundary agreement between India and Bangladesh.

Comparative Politics

• Operationalized via the 100th Constitutional Amendment Act of 2015 to resolve Radcliffe Line anomalies. • Rooted in the unratified 1974 bilateral agreement and the 2011 additional protocol. • Involved the peaceful exchange of 111 Indian enclaves in Bangladesh and 51 Bangladeshi enclaves in India. • Granted affected residents the sovereign right to choose their nationality and place of residence. • Demarcated roughly 6.1 km of previously un-demarcated land boundaries to end administrative confusion. • Secured human rights and welfare access for over 50,000 formerly stateless enclave residents. • Reduced bilateral trust deficits, paving the way for deeper cooperation in security and connectivity.

Q4(c) · UPSC Mains 2026 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks · Solution

What is UNCLOS? Explain its salient features

Comparative Politics

UNCLOS, established in 1982, serves as the constitution of the oceans, codifying customary international law regarding maritime jurisdictions. Its salient features include distinct maritime zones ranging from territorial waters to the high seas, balancing coastal state sovereignty with freedom of navigation. It establishes compulsory dispute settlement mechanisms through institutions like ITLOS. The convention also mandates environmental protection and sustainable management of marine resources. For India, UNCLOS provides a rules-based order in the Indo-Pacific while respecting navigational rights. It remains central to addressing contemporary maritime security and resource challenges.

PDF