Revision summary
China’s rise is economic, military, and institutional, from BRI and AIIB to the SCO. Waltzian capability and Mearsheimer’s warning both fit the regional reaction. The South China Sea, Taiwan, and the Himalaya are the sharp edges of the new order. Neighbours hedge: trade with China, security with the United States, Japan, and the Quad. Ageing, technology denial, and a still-plural Asia block a simple Chinese hegemony.
Model answer
Introduction
The People’s Republic of China has moved from a revolutionary outsider to a great power in wealth, arms, and diplomacy. Asia’s political order is being recast around that rise. The change is not a completed Chinese hegemony.
Body
The rise
- Reform after 1978 produced decades of growth, a manufacturing core, and a claim to the world’s second-largest economy.
- Military modernisation, a blue-water navy, and nuclear and missile forces support great-power status in Waltz’s capability sense.
- The Belt and Road Initiative, the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, and a larger IMF and UN voice show order-shaping, not only catching up.
- The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, partnership with Russia, and a claim to Taiwan as a core interest mark a security posture beyond Deng’s hiding of strength.
Implications for Asian order
- East Asia: the United States alliance net (Japan, South Korea, Australia) has tightened. The Quad and AUKUS are balancing replies in Mearsheimer’s offensive-realist reading of a rising China.
- South China Sea: island building and nine-dash claims collide with UNCLOS and with ASEAN claimants. Hierarchy threatens the older ASEAN-centred diplomatic process.
- South Asia: the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor and Himalayan border crises, including 2020 in eastern Ladakh, pull India toward the Indo-Pacific and away from a purely continental freeze.
- Central Asia and the SCO give Beijing a continental club that is not NATO and not a US-led order.
- Economic order: trade dependence on China sits beside security fear, a classic interdependence trap that Keohane and Nye described in other regions.
Critical limits
- Demographic ageing, debt, and technology controls from the United States qualify linear rise.
- Asian order is still multipolar at the second tier: India, Japan, ASEAN, and Russia are not satellites.
- A Chinese-led hierarchy would need consent that many neighbours refuse. The result is a contested dual order: economic gravity toward China, security insurance toward the United States and minilateral groups.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD PRC[PRC great-power rise] --> E[BRI AIIB trade] PRC --> M[Navy missiles SCO] E --> A[Asian dual order] M --> A Q[Quad US alliances] --> A
Conclusion
The PRC is a great power by capability and by institutional reach. Asian political order has become a dual structure of Chinese economic weight and counter-coalitions such as the Quad. The implication is rivalry and hedging, not a settled Beijing Concert.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Explain the significance of Basic Exchange and Co-operation Agreement (BECA) for Indo-US strategic relations.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2022 · Q5(d)). View answer →
-
Is China already the Asian hegemon?
It is the largest trading partner for many States. It does not command Japan’s or India’s security policy. Hegemony remains incomplete.
-
Does the Quad mean an Asian NATO?
No. There is no Article 5. It is minilateral balancing plus public goods talk, which India insists is not an alliance.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
"During the Cold War, the Non-Aligned Movement tried to become a Third force in World Politics, but failed because it was too large and unwieldy." Discuss -
2023 · Q3(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Account for the rise of European Union as a highly influential regional organisation -
2023 · Q4(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the various constraints on American hegemony today. Which of these are likely to become more prominent in the future? -
2023 · Q6(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Arms trade, economic ties and congruent geo-political interests are no longer the three pillars of India - Russia relationship in the emerging strategic context. Comment -
2022 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the significance of Basic Exchange and Co-operation Agreement (BECA) for Indo-US strategic relations. -
2021 · Q3(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the decline of the United States of America as a hegemon and its implications for the changing international political order -
2021 · Q4(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Explain India's relations with the European Union in the context of Brexit -
2021 · Q7(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Examine the evolution of India's role in the global nuclear order
More from this topic
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
India's reluctance to perceive any 'existential threat' inevitably made the multilateral path to nuclear security a 'default option' until it decided to cross nuclear Rubicon in 1998. Identify and analyze some of the major reasons behind this shift in India's position on the nuclear question
Changing International Political Order
India’s early nuclear path mixed scientific capacity with moral multilateralism and a recessed 1974 PNE. NPT hierarchy, NSG sanctions and CTBT’s closing window turned the default into a cage. China’s arsenal and Pakistan’s weapons-plus-proxy mix supplied the security case for 1998. Vajpayee’s government supplied the political will; status mixed with deterrence. 1998 was admission that survival could no longer be outsourced to a disarming great-power club.
Q5(d) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Does the Non-Aligned Movement have any future in the wake of India's growing indifference towards it?
Changing International Political Order
NAM was India’s bipolar-era instrument: Belgrade 1961, refuse camps, keep voice. Delhi now practises multi-alignment and invests in G20, Quad and 2+2s more than in NAM theatre. Indifference is real because India was NAM’s engine; without it the Movement thins. A future remains as a Global South UN-and-development caucus, not as Cold War neutrality. Verdict: damaged as Indian doctrine, not automatically dead as a membership habit.
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the implications of the scrapping of the Free Movement Regime with Myanmar by the Indian Government on the complex ethno-political dynamics of the north-eastern region.
Changing International Political Order
The FMR let border highland communities cross a short distance because Naga, Chin, Kuki and Mizo kin were split by the India–Myanmar line. Delhi’s restriction is driven by insurgent sanctuaries, narcotics, post-2021 refugees and Manipur’s 2023 conflict. Security gains are possible in counting and fencing. Ethno-political costs fall on hill kinship, humanitarian Chin-Kuki links and Naga cross-border society. A harder border can also empower illegal brokers if political settlement on both sides is absent.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.