Revision summary
Ramesh’s report names infiltration, conniving security staff and forged Aadhaar, ration and voter cards. Withdrawing or diluting it is concealment; a partisan leak and empty resignation also fail. The right option is written refusal, secured copies, lawful channels, and humane statutory process for those caught. Dilemmas include family care versus integrity, and security versus cruelty. Policy needs clean border posts, document integrity, evidence-based forums and protection of the reporting officer.
Model answer
Introduction
Ramesh has a cancer-ward mother, children in a good school, and a report that names infiltration and forged identity documents. The instruction is to withdraw the truth. Covering infiltration is not an option. Humane process for the twelve people caught is still required.
Body
Stakeholders
- Ramesh, his mother in cancer care, and his adolescent children.
- The twelve persons caught at the border and any others in the settlement named in the report.
- Border security personnel alleged to have connived.
- Residents of the State whose rolls, rations and security are affected by forged Aadhaar, ration and voter cards.
- The Additional Home Secretary and the political executive.
- Intelligence sources who trusted him with a confidential report.
(a) Options
- Option 1: Withdraw the report, destroy copies, and stay in the capital.
- Option 2: Quietly dilute the report into a vague “border management note” that names no connivance and no forgery.
- Option 3: Leak the full report to the press or a party office while still in the chair.
- Option 4: Resign at once and leave the file behind.
- Option 5: Refuse withdrawal in writing, keep copies, send the report up and sideways to the competent statutory and intelligence channels, recuse from any cover-up meeting, and ensure the twelve persons are processed by law, not by a mob.
(b) Option to adopt and why
- Adopt Option 5.
- Infiltration with forged Aadhaar, ration and voter cards is a crime against the roll, the treasury and, in a border State, against security. Withdrawing the report is participation in that crime.
- Written refusal creates a record that can protect him later better than a whispered no.
- Humane lawful path: the twelve persons are entitled to identification, hearing, and the procedure that the Foreigners Act, 1946 and related rules require — not a beating, not a secret camp, and not a quiet release arranged by the same nexus.
- Family hardship is real. It does not authorise a false withdrawal. Seek a lawful medical and posting representation after the file is safe, not as a bargain for silence.
(c) Critical evaluation of each option
- Option 1 merit: mother remains near the hospital; promotion may survive.
- Option 1 demerit: concealment of infiltration and forgery; you become part of the connivance you caught; the next batch walks in on your silence.
- Option 2 merit: looks like a compromise.
- Option 2 demerit: a diluted note is still a lie of omission; conniving staff stay at the post.
- Option 3 merit: public heat.
- Option 3 demerit: sources burned, trial by media, possible Official Secrets and service-rule breaches, and the twelve families turned into a communal spectacle.
- Option 4 merit: clean hands in a personal sense.
- Option 4 demerit: the report may be buried the day you leave; resignation without securing the file is abandonment, not courage.
- Option 5 merit: truth preserved, lawful process, deterrence at the post.
- Option 5 demerit: transfer and delayed promotion are likely; that is the cost of the oath, not proof that the option is wrong.
(d) Ethical dilemmas
- Integrity of the report versus the mother’s cancer treatment and the children’s schooling in the capital.
- Loyalty to a superior’s oral order versus loyalty to the Constitution and to residents on the electoral roll.
- Confidentiality of intelligence versus the public’s right not to live with a forged franchise.
- Security of the State versus humane treatment of the twelve persons who may include children.
- Career and promotion versus complicity in infiltration.
- The dilemma is not “kindness versus law”. Kindness that hides forged voter cards is not kindness to the citizen already on the roll.
(e) Policy measures against infiltration
- Border force integrity: rotation, camera and biometric attendance at posts, and independent surprise checks that a Director cannot be ordered to un-see.
- Fast, lawful inquiry against conniving personnel under service and criminal law, including the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 where bribery is made out.
- Identity-document hygiene: Aadhaar, ration and voter databases must talk to each other on duplicates and impossible demographics, with a human appeal so that a genuine poor citizen is not struck off as collateral.
- Foreigners tribunals or equivalent statutory forums that decide presence with evidence, not with a crowd.
- Humane holding, legal aid, and child protection for families caught, while removal or regularisation follows the statute actually in force — not an oral political bargain.
- Intelligence-to-Home paper trail that cannot be withdrawn by one Additional Secretary without a written, reviewable reason.
- Community mapping that targets a racket, not a religion or a language as such.
- Witness protection for local informants and for officers like Ramesh who put a name on a page.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD REP[Infiltration and forged IDs] --> KEEP[Written refusal to withdraw] KEEP --> CHAN[Competent Home intelligence vigilance] KEEP --> HUM[Lawful process for twelve persons] WD[Withdraw report] --> COV[Cover-up] LEAK[Party or press leak] --> SPEC[Spectacle and burned sources]
Conclusion
Withdrawing the report is a cover-up of infiltration and forgery. Ramesh should keep the file alive through written channels, process the twelve by law without cruelty, and accept that a posting may move. Policy must hit conniving posts and fake documents, not invent a humane-sounding silence.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Case study. The Supreme Court has banned mining in the Aravalli Hills to stop degradation the forest cover and to maintain ecological balance. However, the stone mining to still prevalent in the border district of the affected State with connivance of certain corrupt forest officials and politicians. Young and dynamic SP who was recently posted in the affected district promised to himself to stop this menace. In one of his surprise checks with his team, he found loaded truck with stone trying to escape the mining area. He tried to stop the truck but the truck driver overrun the police officer, killing him on the spot and thereafter managed to flee. Police filed FIR but no breakthrough was achieved in the case for almost three months. Ashok who was the Investigative Journalist working with leading TV channel, suo moto started investigating the case. Within one month, Ashok got breakthrough by interacting with local people, stone mining masia and government officials. He prepared his investigative story and presented to the CMD of the TV channel. He exposed in his investigative report the complete nexus of stone mafia working with blessing of corrupt police and civil officials and politicians. The politician who was involved in the mafia was no one else but local MLA who was considered to be very close to the Chief Minister. After going through the investigative report, the CMD advised Ashok to drop the idea of making the story public through electronic media. He informed that the local MLA was not only the relative of the owner of the TV channel but also had unofficially 20 percent share in the channel. The CMD further informed Ashok that his further promotion and hike in pay will be taken care of in addition the soft loan of 10 lakhs which he has taken from the TV channel for his son's chronic disease will be suitably adjusted if he hands over the investigative report to him. (a) What are the options available with Ashok to cope up with the situation? (b) Critically evaluate/examine each of the options identified by Ashok. (c) What are the ethical dilemmas being faced by Ashok? (d) Which of the options, do you think, would be the most appropriate for Ashok to adopt and why? (e)In the above scenario, what type of training would you suggest for police officers posted to such districts where stone mining illegal activities are rampant?
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q9). View answer →
-
Is refusing to withdraw the same as being cruel to migrants?
No. Refusal keeps the facts. Cruelty would be beating, starvation, or collective punishment. Lawful identification and hearing are the humane path.
-
Should Ramesh obey because the Additional Secretary is the channel?
He should send the report through the channel and refuse an illegal oral withdrawal. Hierarchy does not include a duty to falsify a security file.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q7 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Prabhat was working as Vice President (Marketing) at Sterling Electric Ltd., a reputed multinational company. But presently the company was passing through the difficult times as the sales were continuously showing downward trend in the last two quarters. His division, which hitherto had been a major revenue contributor to the company's financial health, was now desperately trying to procure some big government order for them. But their best efforts did not yield any positive success or breakthrough. His was a professional company and his local bosses were under pressure from their London-based HO to show some positive results. In the last performance review meeting taken by the Executive Director (India Head), he was reprimanded for his poor performance. He assured them that his division is working on a special contract from the Ministry of Defence for a secret installation near Gwalior and tender is being submitted shortly. He was under extreme pressure and he was deeply perturbed. What aggravated the situation further was a warning from the top that if the deal is not clinched in favour of the company, his division might have to be closed and he may have to quit his lucrative job. There was another dimension which was causing him deep mental torture and agony. This pertained to his personal precarious financial health. He was a single earner in the family with two school-college going children and his old ailing mother. The heavy expenditure on education and medical was causing a big strain to his monthly pay packet. Regular EMI for housing loan taken from bank unavoidable and any default would render him liable for severe legal action. In the above backdrop, he was hoping for some miracle to happen. There was sudden turn of events. His Secretary informed that a gentleman Subhas Verma wanted to see him as he was interested in the position of Manager which was to be filled by him in the company. He further brought to his notice that his CV has been received through the office of the Minister of Defence. During interview of the candidate-Subhash Verma, he found him technically sound, resourceful and experienced marketeer. He seemed to be well-conversant with tendering procedures and having knack of follow-up and liaising in this regard Prabhat felt that he was better choice than the rest of the candidates who were recently interviewed by him in the last few days. Subhash Verma also indicated that he was in possession of the copies of the bid documents that the Unique Electronics Ltd. would be submitting the next day to the Defence Ministry for their tender. He offered to hand over those documents subject to his employment in the company on suitable terms and conditions. He made it clear that in the process, the Sterling Electric Ltd. could outbid their rival company and get the bid and hefty Defence Ministry order. He indicated that it will be win-win situation for both-him and the company. Prabhat was absolutely stunned. It was a mixed feeling of shock and thrill. He was uncomfortable and perspiring. If accepted, all his problems would vanish instantly and he may be rewarded for securing the much awaited tender and thereby boosting company's sales and financial health. He was in a fix as to the future course of action. He was wonder-struck at the guts of Subhash Verma in having surreptitiously removing his own company papers and offering to the rival company for a job. Being an experienced person, he was examining the pros and cons of the proposal/situation and he asked him to come the next day. (a) Discuss the ethical issues involved in the case. (b) Critically examine the options available to Prabhat in the above situation. (c) Which of the above would be the most appropriate for Prabhat and why? -
2022 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. The Supreme Court has banned mining in the Aravalli Hills to stop degradation the forest cover and to maintain ecological balance. However, the stone mining to still prevalent in the border district of the affected State with connivance of certain corrupt forest officials and politicians. Young and dynamic SP who was recently posted in the affected district promised to himself to stop this menace. In one of his surprise checks with his team, he found loaded truck with stone trying to escape the mining area. He tried to stop the truck but the truck driver overrun the police officer, killing him on the spot and thereafter managed to flee. Police filed FIR but no breakthrough was achieved in the case for almost three months. Ashok who was the Investigative Journalist working with leading TV channel, suo moto started investigating the case. Within one month, Ashok got breakthrough by interacting with local people, stone mining masia and government officials. He prepared his investigative story and presented to the CMD of the TV channel. He exposed in his investigative report the complete nexus of stone mafia working with blessing of corrupt police and civil officials and politicians. The politician who was involved in the mafia was no one else but local MLA who was considered to be very close to the Chief Minister. After going through the investigative report, the CMD advised Ashok to drop the idea of making the story public through electronic media. He informed that the local MLA was not only the relative of the owner of the TV channel but also had unofficially 20 percent share in the channel. The CMD further informed Ashok that his further promotion and hike in pay will be taken care of in addition the soft loan of 10 lakhs which he has taken from the TV channel for his son's chronic disease will be suitably adjusted if he hands over the investigative report to him. (a) What are the options available with Ashok to cope up with the situation? (b) Critically evaluate/examine each of the options identified by Ashok. (c) What are the ethical dilemmas being faced by Ashok? (d) Which of the options, do you think, would be the most appropriate for Ashok to adopt and why? (e)In the above scenario, what type of training would you suggest for police officers posted to such districts where stone mining illegal activities are rampant? -
2022 · Q10 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. You have done MBA from a reputed institution three years back but could not get campus placement due to COVID-19 generated recession. However, after a lot of persuasion and series of competitive tests including written and interview, you managed to get a job in a leading shoe company. You have ageur parents who are dependent and staying with you. You also recently got married after getting this decent job. You were allotted the Inspection Section which is responsible for clearing the final product. In first one year, you learnt your job well and was appreciated for your performance by the management. The company is doing good business for last five years in domestic market and this year it is decided even to export to Europe and Gulf countries. However, one large consignment to Europe was rejected by their Inspecting Team due to certain poor quality and was sent back. The top management ordered that ibid consignment to be cleared for the domestic market. As a part of Inspecting Team, you observed the glaring poor quality and brought to the knowledge of the Team Commander. However, the top management advised all the members of the team to overlook these defects as the management cannot bear such a huge loss. Rest of the team members except you promptly signed and cleared the consignment for domestic market, overlooking glaring defects. You again brought to the knowledge of the Team Commander that such consignment, if cleared even for domestic market, will tarnish the image and reputation of the company and will be counter-productive in the long run. However, you were further advised by the top management that if you do not clear the consignment, the company will not hesitate to terminate your services citing certain innocuous reasons. (a) Under the given conditions, what are the options available to you as a member of the Inspecting Team? (b) Critically evaluate each of the options listed by you. (c) What option would you adopt and why? (d) What are the ethical dilemmas being faced by you? (e) What can be the consequences of overlooking the observations raised by the Inspecting Team? -
2022 · Q11 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Rakesh was working as a Joint Commissioner in Transport department of a city. As a part of his job profile, among others, he was entrusted with the task of overseeing the control and functioning of City Transport Department. A case strike by drivers' union of City Transport Department over the issue of compensation to a driver who died on duty while driving the bus came up before him for decision in the matter. He gathered that the driver (deceased) was plying Bus No. 528 which passed through busy and congested roads of the city. It so happened that near an intersection on the way, there was an accident involving the a middle-aged man. It was found that there was altercation between the driver and the car driver. Heated arguments between them led to fight and the driver gave him a a blow. Lot of passerbys had gathered and tried to intervene but without success. Eventually, both of them were badly injured and profusely bleeding and were taken to the nearby hospital. The driver succumbed to the injuries and could not be saved. The middle-aged driver's condition was also critical but after a day, he recovered and was discharged. Police had immediately come to the spot and FIR was registered. Police investigation revealed that the quarrel in was started by the bus driver and he had resorted to physical violence. There exchange of blows between them. The City Transport Department management is considering of not giving any extra compensation to the driver's (deceased) family. The family is very aggrieved. depressed and agitated against the discriminatory and non-sympathetic approach of the City Transport Department management. The bus driver (deceased) was 52 years of age, was survived by his wife and two school-college going daughters. He was the sole earner of the family. The City Transport Department workers' union took up this case and when found no favourable response from the management, decided to go on strike. The union's demand was two fold. First was full extra compensation as given to other drivers who died on duty and secondly employment to one family member. The strike has continued for 10 days and the deadlock remains. (a) What are the options available to Rakesh to meet the above situation? (b) Critically examine each of the options identified by Rakesh (c) What are the ethical dilemmas being faced by Rakesh? (d) What course of action would Rakesh adopt to diffuse the above situation? -
2022 · Q12 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. You are appointed as an officer heading the section in Environment Pollution Control Board to ensure compliance and its follow-up. In that region, there were large number of small and medium industries which had been granted clearance. You learnt that these industries provide employment to many migrant worker. Most of the industrial units have got environmental clearance certificate in their possession. The environmental clearance seeks to curb industries and projects that supposedly hamper environment and living species in the region, But in practice. most of these units remain to be polluting units in several ways like air, water and soil pollution. As such, local people encountered persistent health problems. It was confirmed that majority of the industries were violating environmental compliance. You issued notice to all the industrial units to apply for fresh environmental clearance certificate from the competent authority. However, your action met with hostile response from a section of the industrial units, other vested interest persons and a section of the local politicians. The workers also became hostile to you as they felt that your action would lead to the closure of these industrial units, and the resultant unemployment will lead to insecurity uncertainty in their livelihood. Many owners of the industries approached you with the plea that you should not initiate harsh action as it would compel them their units, and cause huge financial loss, shortage of their products in the market. These would obviously add to the sufferings of the labourers and the consumers alike. The labour union also sent you representation requesting against the closure of the units. You simultaneously started receiving threats from unknown corners. You however received supports from some of your colleagues, who advised you to act freely to ensure environmental compliance. Local NGOs also came to your support and they demanded the closure of the polluting units immediately. (a) What are the options available to you under the given situation? (b) Critically examine the options listed by you. (c) What type of mechanism would you suggest to ensure environmental compliance? (d) What are the ethical dilemmas you faced in exercising your option? -
2021 · Q7 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Sunil is a young civil servant and has a reputation for his competence, integrity, dedication, and relentless pursuit of difficult and onerous jobs. Considering his profile, he was picked up by his bosses to handle a very challenging and sensitive assignment. He was posted in a tribal-dominated district notorious for illegal sand mining. Excavating sand from river belts and transporting it through trucks and selling them in the black market was rampant. This illegal sand mining mafia was operating with the support of local functionaries and tribal musclemen who in turn were bribing selected poor tribals and had kept the tribals under fear and intimidation. Sunil being a sharp and energetic officer immediately grasped the ground realities and the modus operandi followed by the mafia through their devious and dubious mechanism. On making inquiries, he gathered that some of their own office employees are in hand and glove with them and have developed close unholy nexus. Sunil initiated stringent action against them and started conducting raids on their illegal operations of the movement of trucks filled with sand. The mafia got rattled as not many officers in the past had taken such steps against the mafia. Some of the office employees who were allegedly close to mafia informed them that the officer is determined to clean up the mafia's illegal sand mining operations in that the district and may cause them irreparable damage. The mafia turned hostile and launched a counter-offensive. The tribal musclemen and mafia started threatening him with dire consequences. His family (wife and old mother) were stalked and were under virtual surveillance and thus causing mental torture, agony, and stress to all of them. The matter assumed serious proportions when a muscleman came to his office and threatened him to stop raids, etc., otherwise, his fate will not be different than some of his predecessors (ten years back one officer was killed by the mafia). - Identify the different options available to Sunil in attending to this situation. - Critically evaluate each of the options listed by you. - Which of the above, do you think, would be the most appropriate for Sunil to adopt and why? -
2021 · Q8 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. You are Vice Principal of a degree college in one of the middle-class towns. The principal has recently retired and management is looking for his replacement. There are also feelers that the management may promote you as Principal. In the meantime, during annual examination, the flying squad came from the university caught two students red-handeld involving in unfair means. A senior lecturer of the college was personally helping these student in this act. This senior lecturer also happens to be close to the management. One of the students was son of a local politician who was responsible in getting college affiliated to the present reputed university. The second student was son of a local businessman who has donated maximum funds for running of the college. You immealately informed the management regarding this unfortunate incident. The management told you to resolve the issue with flying squad at any cost. They further said that such incident will not only tarnish the image of the college but also the politician and businessman are very important personalities for the functioning of the college. You were also given hint that your further promotion to Principal depends on your capability in resolving this issue with flying squad. In the meantime, you were intimated by your administrative officer that certain members of the student union are protesting outside the college gate against the senior lecturer and the students involved in this incident and demanding strict action against defaulters. - Discuss the ethical issues involved in the case. - Critically examine the options available with you as Vice Principal. What option will you adopt and why? -
2021 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. An elevated corridor is being constructed to reduce traffic congestion in the capital of a particular state. You have been selected as project manager of this prestigious project on your professional competence and experience. The deadline is to complete the project in next two years by 20 June, 2021, since this project is to be inaugurated by the Chief Minister before the elections are announced in the second week of July 2021. While carrying out the surprise inspection by inspecting team, a minor crack was noticed in one of the piers of the elevated corridor possibly due to poor material used. You immediately informed the chief engineer and stopped further work. It was assessed by you that minimum three piers of the elevated corridor have to be demolished and reconstructed. But this process will delay the project minimum by four to six months. But the chief engineer overruled the observation of inspecting team on the ground that it was a minor crack which will not in any way impact the strength and durability of the bridge. He ordered you to overlook the observation of inspecting team and continue working with same speed and tempo. He informed you that the minister does not want any delay as he wants the chief Minister to inaugurate the elevated corridor before the elections are declared. Also informed you that the contractor is far relative of the minister and he wants him to finish the project. He also gave you hint that your further promotion as additional chief engineer is under consideration with the ministry. However, you strongly felt that the minor crack in the pier of the elevated corridor will adversely affect the health and life of the bridge and therefore it will be very dangerous not to repair the elevated corridor. - Under the given conditions, what are the options available to you as a project manager? - What are the ethical dilemmas being faced by the project manager? - What are the professional challenges likely to be faced by the project manager and his response to overcome such challenges? - What can be the consequences of overlooking the observation raised by the inspecting team?
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2022 · GS IV · 10 marks
(a) Wisdom lies in knowing what to reckon with and what to overlook. An officer being engrossed with the periphery, ignoring the core issues before him, is no rare in the bureaucracy. Do you agree that such preoccupation of an administrator leads to travesty of justice to the cause of effective service delivery and good governance? Critically evaluate. (b) Apart from intellectual competency and moral qualities, empathy and compassion are some of the other vital attributes that facilitate the civil servants to be more competent in tackling the crucial issues or taking critical decisions. Explain with suitable illustrations.
Civil Service Aptitude and Values
Wisdom in bureaucracy is knowing which issue is the core right and which is ceremonial noise. Living on the periphery delays the weakest citizen and empties good governance. Due process is not periphery; skipping a hearing in the name of speed is another injustice. Intellect and morals are necessary but not sufficient for hard decisions. Empathy gathers true facts; compassion completes the service inside the law.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2022 · GS IV · 10 marks
(a) The Rules and Regulations provided to all the civil servants are same, yet there is difference in the performance. Positive minded officers are able to interpret the Rules and Regulations in favour of the case and achieve success, whereas negative minded officers are unable to achieve goals by interpreting the same Rules and Regulations against the case. Discuss with illustrations. (b) It is believed that adherence to ethics in human actions would ensure in smooth functioning of an organization/system. If so, what does ethics seek to promote in human life? How do ethical values assist in the resolution of conflicts faced by him in his day-to-day functioning?
Ethics and Human Interface
Identical rules yield different results because interpretation carries the officer’s motive and fear. A positive reading completes a lawful case; a negative reading manufactures objections. Positive is not illegal favour; it is the purpose of a beneficial rule. Ethics promotes right conduct, trust and a life that does not need two ledgers. Integrity, impartiality, empathy, courage and temperance settle the day’s conflicts in one public standard.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2022 · GS IV · 10 marks
(a) Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have the right to do and what is right to do.'-Potter Stewart . (b) "If a country is to be corruption free and become a nation of beautiful minds, I strongly feel there are three key societal members who can make a difference. They are the father, the mother and the teacher." - Abdul Kalam. (c) "Judge your success by what you had to give up in order to get it." Dalai Lama.
Probity in Governance
Stewart separates permission from justification; legality is the first test, not the last. Public power to transfer, demolish or dismiss can be legal and still fail dignity. Kalam places anti-corruption in parents and teachers who refuse to sell a grade or a file. Statutes punish late; the dining table and the classroom teach early. The Dalai Lama measures success by the duties sacrificed; a posting or a GDP number bought with silence or a river is a loss.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.