Revision summary
Hatred blinds facts, recuses conscience and trains a nation in cruelty. Anger at injustice can be moral; hatred of a whole community is not. EI’s main components are self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy and social skills. They can largely be learned through practice, feedback and a culture that rewards calm. A workshop cannot install EI if the organisation pays for rage.
Model answer
Introduction
Hate looks like energy. Part (a) asks whether it actually burns the mind and then the republic. Part (b) asks what emotional intelligence is made of, and whether an adult — including a civil servant — can still learn it.
Body
(a) Hatred destroys wisdom and poisons a nation’s spirit — agreement
- Agreement is substantially right. Hatred is not a sharp tool that one puts down after use. It rewires attention, so that facts which do not feed the enemy-picture are not seen.
- Wisdom needs the capacity to hold two facts, to wait, and to change one’s mind. Hatred treats change of mind as treason.
- Conscience is the inner court that still asks “is this fair to that person?” Hatred recuses that court and substitutes a crowd.
- At the person: a lynch rumour, an honour killing, or an officer who “teaches a lesson” to a community has already lost the prudence that Article 21 requires.
- At the nation: a poisoned spirit is a public that cheers humiliation, a market that boycotts a surname, and a police that arrives late for one victim and early for another.
- Justification from public ethics: constitutional fraternity (Preamble; Article 51A) is the opposite of a spirit organised by hate. The Second Administrative Reforms Commission treated communal bias in administration as a governance failure, not a private taste.
- Justification from history: Partition’s long trauma, 1984, 2002, and smaller riots show the same sequence — rumour, dehumanisation, then a generation that cannot share a classroom without fear.
- Hate speech dressed as nationalism still poisons: it spends soft power, scares capital, and trains children that cruelty is belonging.
- Critical limit: anger at injustice is not the same as hatred of persons. Fury at a rapist, a rioter or a corrupt nexus can be moral. Hatred that paints a whole faith, caste or language as the crime is what the quote names.
- Another limit: nations need a spine against aggression. Deterrence and lawful force are not hatred. Targeting civilians, or enjoying the enemy’s child’s death, is.
- Therefore: agree. Hatred destroys the individual’s wisdom and conscience, then leaks into the nation’s spirit as a habit of cruelty. Public duty is to starve it — accurate speech, equal law, and no reward for the entrepreneur of offence.
(b) Components of EI, and whether they can be learned
- Emotional intelligence is the ability to notice, name, use and regulate emotions in oneself and in others so that a decision stays intelligent.
- Main components, in the working list used in administration and in Goleman’s popular model: self-awareness; self-regulation; motivation; empathy; and social skills.
- Self-awareness: knowing that you are afraid, vain or furious before the noting is written. Without it, the file is a mood.
- Self-regulation: pausing the transfer order, the lathi, or the tweet until the fact sheet is true. It is temperance under the Conduct Rules, not numbness.
- Motivation: a drive toward the public task that is not only ACR or applause. It is what keeps an officer in a flood camp after the camera leaves.
- Empathy: accurate reading of the person at the counter — a widow who cannot name a scheme, a child who will not speak before the uncle.
- Social skills: listening, speaking so a crowd can de-escalate, coordinating police and health without a turf war, and giving a speaking order that a citizen can understand.
- Can they be learned? Yes, in large part. They are skills and habits, not a mystic gift reserved for the saint.
- Childhood and culture set a baseline. Training, feedback, role-play, field attachment, counselling after a riot or a disaster, and a boss who models calm can still shift an adult.
- Evidence from practice: de-escalation training for police, mindfulness as attention training, 360-degree feedback, and case discussion of illegal oral orders all treat EI as teachable.
- Limits: a person who enjoys cruelty, or whose incentives punish empathy, will not “learn” EI from a two-day workshop. Learning needs a system that does not reward the shout.
- For civil servants: EI is learnable and it is a duty. A brilliant officer who cannot regulate rage or read a frightened complainant will still produce injustice.
- Learning is not faking warmth. It is building the five components so that law is applied with a steady hand.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD HAT[Hatred] --> WIS[Wisdom fails] HAT --> CON[Conscience recused] HAT --> NSP[Nation's spirit poisoned] EI[Emotional intelligence] --> SA[Self-awareness] EI --> SR[Self-regulation] EI --> MOT[Motivation] EI --> EMP[Empathy] EI --> SS[Social skills] LEARN[Training and example] --> EI
Conclusion
Hatred is agreed to be a solvent of wisdom, conscience and national spirit; righteous anger at a crime is not a licence to hate a people. Emotional intelligence has five working parts and can be learned as habit, if institutions stop paying for the opposite.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
(а) What teachings of Buddha are most relevant today and why? Discuss. (b) "The will to power exists, but it can be tamed and be guided by rationality and principles of moral duty.' Examine this statement in the context of international relations.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Is criticising a government the same as poisoning the nation’s spirit?
No. Dissent can be wisdom. Hatred of a people, or delight in another citizen’s humiliation, is what the quote condemns.
-
If EI is learned, should recruitment still test it?
Yes. A floor of empathy and regulation should be screened, then trained. Learning does not mean hiring the cruel and hoping a lecture will suffice.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2020 · GS IV · 10 marks
(a) Discuss the role of ethics and values in enhancing the following three major components of Comprehensive National Power (CNP) viz. human capital, soft power (culture and policies) and social harmony. (b) "Education is not an injunction, it is an effective and pervasive tool for all-round development of an individual and social transformation". Examine the New Education Policy, 2020 (NEP, 2020) in light of the above statement.
Ethics and Human Interface
CNP is more than force; ethics thickens human capital, soft power and harmony. Exclusion, fake science and communal speech are power leaks. Soft power needs kept promises and a culture that does not humiliate. NEP 2020 aims at all-round development: foundational learning, flexibility, equity, vocational and civic formation. Without teachers, devices and inquiry, the same Policy becomes another command.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2020 · GS IV · 10 marks
(а) What teachings of Buddha are most relevant today and why? Discuss. (b) "The will to power exists, but it can be tamed and be guided by rationality and principles of moral duty.' Examine this statement in the context of international relations.
Ethics and Human Interface
The Four Noble Truths, Eightfold Path, middle way, compassion and mindfulness are the Buddhist teachings most usable now. They speak to consumption, hate speech, ecology and stressed officials, without making Buddhism the State. The will to power exists in international relations. It can be guided by strategic reason and by duties in the Charter, treaties and humanitarian law. The leash fails when a State exempts itself; ethics applies the duty at home as well.
Q4 · UPSC Mains 2020 · GS IV · 10 marks
(a) Distinguish between laws and rules. Discuss the role of ethics in formulating them (b) A positive attitude is considered to be an essential characteristic of a civil servant who is often required to function under extreme stress. What contributes to a positive attitude in a person?
Attitude
Laws are general norms from the Constitution or legislature; rules are usually subordinate procedure under a parent Act. Rules cannot lawfully eat the Act; ethics forbids hiding policy in fine print that the poor cannot meet. Drafting ethics is equality, consultation, non-retrospectivity of pain, and proportionate means. Positive attitude under stress is realistic, duty-centred energy, not denial. It grows from character, EI, drills, team support and institutions that do not punish honesty.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.