Revision summary
The Minister's request is an actual conflict: public alignment bent to a farmhouse. The plot in your wife's name is insider gain dressed as a legal sale. Realigning "without the plot" still spends extra farms, money and trees on a private end. Duty is to keep the engineered line, refuse the bargain in writing, and report the offer. Conduct rules treat a spouse's holding as the officer's integrity problem, not a clever screen.
Model answer
Introduction
The Minister wants a road to his farmhouse and a plot for your wife before the announcement. That is not a real-estate tip. It is a capture of a public alignment and of a public servant.
Body
Stakeholders
- Farmers who would lose extra land under the new line.
- The public exchequer that would pay extra compensation.
- Downstream ecology and the trees the original plan spared.
- Your spouse, who would hold a tainted plot.
- The Minister, the Ministry, and honest colleagues on the drawing.
- Future users of the road, who need a line designed for traffic and safety, not for a farmhouse gate.
Conflicts of interest
- Actual conflict: the Minister's land value will rise if the road kisses his farmhouse. He is using public power for a private estate.
- Actual conflict offered to you: a plot in your wife's name at today's price is insider dealing in all but name. You would gain from the announcement you help shape.
- The "I am buying legally" line is false ethics. Legality of a sale deed does not clean the use of unpublished official information, nor the abuse of alignment.
- Potential conflict: even if you refuse the plot, fear of transfer can start to bend the file. Name that fear so it does not drive the pen.
- Familial conflict: a spouse's name is not a curtain. Conduct rules treat family holdings as the officer's concern.
- Loyalty conflict: the Minister is the political executive; the Constitution and the road's public purpose outrank his farmhouse.
Options
- Option 1: Realign and buy the plot.
- Merit: career comfort and private gain.
- Demerit: corruption, extra displacement, extra trees down, and a file that will not survive a later inquiry. Rejected.
- Option 2: Realign but refuse the plot, to "save the job".
- Merit: you keep your hands off the land.
- Demerit: you still gift public money and farmers to a private house. Still rejected.
- Option 3: Informal oral refusal, no record.
- Merit: less scene.
- Demerit: the next meeting repeats the pressure; you have no protection and the alignment may still move through another hand.
- Option 4: Written refusal of realignment and of the plot; restore the engineered line; report the offer to the competent authority.
- Merit: integrity, environment, farmers, and a record.
- Demerit: transfer risk. That is the cost of the oath.
Duties and action
- Duty of legality: alignments follow the approved technical plan and acquisition law, not an oral farmhouse wish.
- Duty of integrity under the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 and, if you are AIS, the 1968 rules: no gift, no extra savings, no speculative land on insider knowledge.
- Duty of environmental care already built into the original design: you may not volunteer extra deforestation.
- Duty to farmers: minimise acquisition, as the planners did. Extra taking for a private convenience fails public purpose.
- Duty of courage: put the Minister's instruction on the file if it is insisted upon, and record your dissent. Ask for written orders.
- Duty of reporting: inform the Secretary / Chief Vigilance Officer / competent anti-corruption channel about the plot offer. Keep a contemporaneous note.
- Do not tip friends to buy land along the official corridor either. The information is still official.
- Recuse from any remaining decision if your family already bought land nearby, and still report.
- If victimised by transfer, use the lawful representation route; do not leak drawings as revenge.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD MIN[Minister farmhouse line] --> COI[Private gain on public road] PLOT[Plot in spouse name] --> INS[Insider conflict] COI --> REF[Refuse on file] INS --> REF REF --> VIG[Report to competent authority] REF --> PLAN[Keep original alignment]
Conclusion
Refuse the realignment, refuse the plot, refuse the extra cash, and write it down. The Minister's farmhouse is a private interest. Your duty is a cheaper, greener, fairer public road and a clean name in your wife's records.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
If the Minister issues a written order to realign, must you obey?
Obey only a lawful written order. Put your dissent on the note. A written order to loot farmers for a farmhouse is not a shield you should hide behind without reporting.
-
Is the purchase clean if your wife pays market price after notification?
After equal public notification, ordinary purchase by a non-insider is a different story. Using pre-notification knowledge, a ministerial discount, or a top-up of savings remains tainted.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q7 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Edward Snowden, a computer expert, and former CIA administrator, released confidential Government documents to the press about the existence of Government surveillance programmes. According to many legal experts and the US Government, his action violated the Espionage act of 1971, which identified the leak of State secrets as an act of treason. Yet, despite the fact that he broke the law, Snowden argued that he had a moral obligation to act. He gave a justification for his "whistleblowing" by stating that he had a duty "to inform the public as to that which is done in their name and that which is done against them." According to Snowden, the Government's violation of privacy had to be exposed regardless of legality since more substantive issues of social action and public morality were involved here. Many agreed with Snowden. Few argued that he broke the law and compromised national security, for which he should be held accountable. Do you agree that Snowden's actions were ethically justified even if legally prohibited? Why or why not? Make an argument by weighing the competing values in this case. (250 words). -
2018 · Q8 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Rakesh is a responsible district-level officer, who enjoys the trust of his higher officials. Knowing his honesty, the government entrusted him with the responsibility of identifying the beneficiaries under a health care scheme meant for senior citizens. The criteria to be a beneficiary are the following: (a) 60 years of age or above. (b) Belonging to a reserved community. (c) Family income of less than 1 Lakh rupees per annum. (d) Post-treatment prognosis is likely to be high to make a positive difference to the quality of life of the beneficiary. One day, an old couple visited Rakesh's office with their application. They have been the residents of a village in his district since their birth. The old man is diagnosed with a rare condition that causes obstruction in the large intestine. As a consequence, he has severe abdominal pain frequently that prevents him from doing any physical labour. The couple has no children to support them. The expert surgeon whom they contacted is willing to do the surgery without charging any fee. However, the couple will have to bear the cost of incidental charges, such as medicines, hospitalization, etc., to the tune of rupees one lakh. The couple fulfills all the criteria except criterion 'b'. However, any financial aid would certainly make a significant difference in their quality of life. How should Rakesh respond to the situation? (250 words). -
2018 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. It is a State where prohibition is in force. You are recently appointed as the Superintendent of Police of a district notorious for illicit distillation of liquor. The illicit liquor leads to many death, reported and unreported, and causes a major problem for the district authorities. The approach till now had been to view it as a law and order problem and tackle it accordingly. Raids, arrests, police cases, and criminal trials - all these had only limited impact. The problem remains as serious as ever. Your inspections show that the parts of the district where the distillation flourishes are economically, industrially, and educationally backward. Agriculture is badly affected by poor irrigation facilities. Frequent clashes among communities gave a boost to illicit distillation. No major initiatives had taken place in the past either from the government's side or from social organizations to improve a lot of the people. Which new approach will you adopt to bring the problem under control? (250 words). -
2018 · Q10 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. A big corporate house is engaged in manufacturing industrial chemicals on a large scale. It proposes to set up an additional unit. Many states rejected its proposal due to its detrimental effect on the environment. But one state government acceded to the request and permitted the unit close to a city, brushing aside all opposition. The unit was set up 10 years ago and was in full swing till recently. The pollution caused by the industrial effluents was affecting the land, water, and crops in the area. It was also causing serious health problems to human beings and animals. This gave rise to a series of agitations demanding the closure of the plant. In a recent agitation, thousands of people took part, creating a law and order problem necessitating stern police action. Following the public outcry, the State government ordered the closure of the factory. The closure of the factory resulted in the unemployment of not only those workers who were engaged in the factory but also those who were working in the ancillary units. It also very badly affected those industries which depended on the chemicals manufactured by it. As a senior officer entrusted with the responsibility of handling these issues, how are you going to address it? (250 words). -
2018 · Q11 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Dr. X is a leading medical practitioner in a city. He has set up a charitable trust through which he plans to establish a super-specialty hospital in the city to cater to the medical needs of all sections of society. Incidentally, that part of the State had been neglected over the years. The proposed hospital would be a boon for the region. You are heading the tax investigation agency of that region. During an inspection of the doctor's clinic, your officers have found out some major irregularities. A few of them are substantial which had resulted in considerable withholding of tax that should be paid by him now. The doctor is cooperative. He undertakes to pay the tax immediately. However, there are certain other deficiencies in his tax compliance that are purely technical in nature. If these technical defaults are pursued by the agency, considerable time and energy of the doctor will be diverted to issues that are not so serious, urgent, or even helpful to the tax collection process. Further, in all probability, it will hamper the prospects of the hospital coming up. There are two options before you: Taking a broader view, ensuring substantial tax compliance, and ignoring defaults that are merely technical in nature. Pursue the matter strictly and proceed on all fronts, whether substantial or merely technical. As the head of the tax agency, which course of action will you opt for and why? (250 words). -
2017 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. A building permitted for three floors, while being extended illegally to 6 floors by a builder, collapses. As a consequence, a number of innocent labourers including women and children died. These labourers are migrants of different places. The government immediately announced cash relief to the aggrieved families and arrested the builder. Give reasons for such incidents taking place across the country. Suggest measures to prevent their occurrence. -
2017 · Q10 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. You are an honest and responsible civil servant. You often observe the following: (a) There is a general perception that adhering to ethical conduct one may face difficulties to oneself and cause problems for the family, whereas unfair practices may help to reach the career goals. (b) When the number of people adopting unfair means is large, a small minority having a penchant towards ethical means makes no difference. (c) Sticking to ethical means is detrimental to the larger developmental goals (d) While one may not involve oneself in large unethical practices, but giving and accepting small gifts makes the system more efficient. Examine the above statements with their merits and demerits. -
2017 · Q11 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. You are aspiring to become an IAS officer and you have cleared various stages and now you have been selected for the personal interview. On the day of the interview, on the way to the venue you saw an accident where a mother and child who happen to be your relatives were badly injured. They needed immediate help. What would you have done in such a situation? Justify your action.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2018 · GS IV · 10 marks
(a) State the three basic values, universal in nature, in the context of civil services and bring out their importance. (b) Distinguish between "Code of ethics" and "Code of conduct" with suitable examples.
Probity in Governance
The three universal civil-service values are integrity, impartiality and objectivity. Integrity is honest trusteeship; impartiality is equal treatment; objectivity is fact-and-law decisions with recorded reasons. They matter because public money, Article 14 equality and a file that can face a court all depend on them. A code of ethics states values; a code of conduct lists punishable do's and don'ts. Nolan and the Second ARC illustrate ethics; the CCS Conduct Rules, 1964 illustrate conduct.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2018 · GS IV · 10 marks
(a) What is meant by public interest? What are the principles and procedures to be followed by the civil servants in public interest? (b) "The Right to Information Act is not all about citizens' empowerment alone, it essentially redefines the concept of accountability. Discuss.
Probity in Governance
Public interest is the welfare of the whole community under the Constitution, not popularity or official prestige. Civil servants serve it through legality, impartiality, proportionality, recorded reasons, published criteria and a preference for the weakest. Upward reporting is not enough if the file stays secret. The RTI Act, 2005 empowers citizens to seek information and redefines accountability as an answer owed to the public. Suo motu disclosure, time limits and the Information Commission make that new accountability real, though exemptions and fear still weaken it.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2018 · GS IV · 10 marks
(a) What is meant by conflict of interest? Illustrate with examples, the difference between the actual and potential conflicts of interest. (b) "In looking for people to hire, you look for three qualities: integrity, intelligence and energy. And if they do not have the first, the other two will kill you." - Warren Buffett What do you understand by this statement in the present-day scenario? Explain.
Ethics in Public Administration
Conflict of interest is a private interest that can twist a public or fiduciary duty. Actual conflict is already operating on this decision; potential conflict is reasonably foreseeable even if today's file looks clean. The cure is disclosure, recusal, divestment and screens, not private hope. Buffett ranks integrity first because intelligence and energy multiply both service and fraud. Present-day scams, surveillance tools and mark-worshipping recruitment make that ranking more, not less, urgent.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.