Revision summary
Saraswati’s school met confusion, delay, callousness and bribe demands. Control over NGOs is justified for money, land and child safety; coercion and corruption are not. Paying the tout, or abolishing regulation, both fail. Measures include a statutory checklist, single window, time limits, RTI tracking, risk-based scrutiny, e-payments, vigilance, and a facilitation cell. Child-safety and accounts stay strict; invented windows must go.
Model answer
Introduction
A patriot with a school project meets a forest of windows, delay and a bribe culture. The State is right to watch money, land and children. It is wrong to turn that watch into a toll gate. The answer is control that is clear, time-bound and clean.
Body
Stakeholders
- Saraswati, her colleagues, donors, and the rural children who need the school.
- Honest NGOs that will copy her exit if the toll continues.
- Corrupt officials and touts who price delay.
- Children as a vulnerable class, who need real safeguards against fake charities.
- The education, land, charity-commissioner and tax offices that hold lawful pieces of clearance.
- The wider public, which funds exemptions and must not be looted through shell NGOs.
Ethical issues and values
- Integrity versus extraction: a bribe is not a “speed fee”; it is a tax on altruism.
- Accountability versus harassment: knowing who runs a school is legitimate; twelve unclear windows are not.
- Compassion: rural children pay when the honest founder gives up.
- Rule of law: equal procedure for a returned professional and for a well-connected trust.
- Values: integrity, responsiveness, transparency, empathy, and fiduciary care for minors.
Options
- Option 1: Tell her to pay and “be practical”.
- Merit: the school might open this year.
- Demerit: you train a market in permissions and push honest people out.
- Option 2: Abolish all NGO regulation.
- Merit: speed.
- Demerit: fake schools, foreign-fund crime, and child-safety holes.
- Option 3: Keep control, strip it of confusion, delay and cash.
Action: measures that keep control and spare honest work
- Single-window, published checklist: one portal listing every approval for a non-profit school, with the statute cited, so “confusion” cannot be a business model.
- Time limits and deemed approval where the Second Administrative Reforms Commission logic of citizen charters applies, with a named officer and a penalty for delay, not for the applicant.
- Online tracking and the Right to Information Act, 2005: every file number public, every query in writing. Oral objections should not count.
- Risk-based regulation: light and fast for a small rural school with clean accounts; heavy scrutiny for large foreign funds, land banks and boarding hostels.
- Integrity: CCTV at enquiry counters, e-payments only, rotation, and vigilance traps on repeat “facilitators”. The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 must reach the tout and the officer.
- Standard documents: model trust deed, fire and building norms in plain language, and a help desk that is not a tout in uniform.
- Social audit and third-party accreditation for those who want a quality mark, instead of forty serial signatures.
- Protect whistle-blowers who record a bribe demand; a sting that is lawful is better than a sermon.
- Separate child-safety control (identity of staff, no corporal cruelty, grievance) from rent-seeking on land conversion.
- FCRA and tax exemption should be predictable: published queries, speaking orders, and no sudden freeze without reasons — control, not theatre. (The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 is the lawful frame; it must not be a silent punishment tool.)
- Local administration: a District Magistrate NGO facilitation cell with a weekly sitting, minutes published.
- Judicial and Lokayukta routes for delay as a service failure, not only as a private writ by one exhausted founder.
- Civic education inside departments: social work is not an enemy of the State; a school that works reduces the State’s later bill.
What Saraswati should still accept
- True building safety, true teacher norms, true accounts. Due control is not “whatever the clerk invents today”.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD NGO[Honest NGO school] --> CTRL[Due State control] CTRL --> WIN[Single window and time limits] CTRL --> RISK[Heavier watch on money and child safety] BRIBE[Delay and bribe] --> EXIT[Honest founders quit] WIN --> OPEN[School opens lawfully]
Conclusion
The State must know who teaches whose children and whose money. It must not sell that knowledge as delay. Single windows, clocks on files, risk-based scrutiny, e-trails and anti-bribe enforcement protect both the child and the honest NGO.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Case study. A fresh engineering graduate gets a job in a prestigious chemical industry. She likes the work. The salary is also good. However, after a few months she accidentally discovers that a highly toxic waste is being secretly discharged into a river nearby. This is causing health problems to the villagers downstream who depend on the river for their water needs. She is perturbed and mentions her concern to her colleagues who have been with the company for longer periods. They advise her to keep quite as anyone who mentions the topic is summarily dismissed. She cannot risk losing her job as she is the sole beard-winner for her family and has to support her ailing parents and siblings. At first, she thinks that if her seniors are keeping quiet, why should she stick out her neck. But her conscience pricks her to do something to save the river and the people who depend upon it. At heart she feels that the advice of silence given by her friends is not correct though she cannot give reasons for it. She thinks you are a wise person and seeks your advice. (a) What arguments can you advance to show her that keeping quiet is not morally right? (b) What course of action would you advice her to adopt and why?
Next question in the 2016 paper (Q11). View answer →
-
Is asking an NGO for accounts an insult to patriotism?
No. Accounts are due control. Insult begins when the same accounts are used as a hostage for cash.
-
Should Saraswati use a political patron to jump the queue?
That reproduces the disease. She should use the portal, RTI, written reminders and vigilance, and keep her own books cleaner than the clerk expects.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2016 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. ABC Ltd. is a large transnational company having diversified business activities with a huge shareholder base. The company is continuously expanding the generating employment. The company, in its expansion and diversification programme, decides to establish a new plant at Vikaspuri, an area which is underdeveloped. The new plant is designed to use energy efficient technology that will help the company to save production cost by 20%. The company's decision goes well with the Government policy of attracting investment to develop such underdeveloped regions. The government has also announced tax holiday for five years for the companies that invest in underdeveloped areas. However, the new plant may bring chaos for the inhabitants of Vikaspuri region, which is otherwise tranquil. The new plant may result in increased cost of living, aliens migrating to the region, disturbing the social and economic order. The company sensing the possible protest tried to educate the people of Vikaspuri region and public in general that how its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policy would help overcome the likely difficulties of the residents of Vikaspuri region. In spite of this the protests begin and some of the residents decided to approach the judiciary as their plea before the Government did not yield any result. (a) Identify the issues involved in the case. (b) What can be suggested to satisfy the company's goal and to address the residents' concern? -
2016 · Q11 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. A fresh engineering graduate gets a job in a prestigious chemical industry. She likes the work. The salary is also good. However, after a few months she accidentally discovers that a highly toxic waste is being secretly discharged into a river nearby. This is causing health problems to the villagers downstream who depend on the river for their water needs. She is perturbed and mentions her concern to her colleagues who have been with the company for longer periods. They advise her to keep quite as anyone who mentions the topic is summarily dismissed. She cannot risk losing her job as she is the sole beard-winner for her family and has to support her ailing parents and siblings. At first, she thinks that if her seniors are keeping quiet, why should she stick out her neck. But her conscience pricks her to do something to save the river and the people who depend upon it. At heart she feels that the advice of silence given by her friends is not correct though she cannot give reasons for it. She thinks you are a wise person and seeks your advice. (a) What arguments can you advance to show her that keeping quiet is not morally right? (b) What course of action would you advice her to adopt and why? -
2016 · Q12 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Land needed for mining, dams and other largescale projects is acquired mostly from Adivasis, hill dwellers and rural communities. The displaced persons are paid monetary compensation as per the legal provisions. However, the payment is often tardy. In any case, it cannot sustain the displaced families for long. These people do not possess marketable skills to engage in some other accusation. They end up as low paid migrant laborers. Moreover, the development goes to industries, industrialists and urban communities whereas the costs are passed on to these poor helpless people. This unjust distribution of costs and benefits is unethical. Suppose you have been entrusted with the task of drafting a better compensation-cum-rehabilitation policy for such displaced persons, how would you approach the problem and what would be the main elements of your suggested policy? -
2016 · Q13 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Suppose you are an officer in charge of implementing a social service scheme to provide support to old and destitute women. An old and illiterate woman comes to you to avail the benefits of the scheme. However, she has no documents to show that she fulfils the eligibility criteria. But after meeting her and listening to her you feel that she certainly needs support. Your enquiries also show that she is really destitute and living in a pitiable condition. You are in a dilemma as to what to do. Putting her under the scheme without necessary documents would clearly be violation of rules. But denying her the support would be cruel and inhuman. (a) Can you think of a rational way to resolve this dilemma? (b) Give your reasons for it. 24. You are a young, aspiring. -
2016 · Q14 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. You are a young, aspiring and sincere employee in a Government office working as an assistant to the director of your department. Since you have joined recently, you need to lean and progress. Luckily your superior is very kind and ready to train you for your job. He is a very intelligent and well-informed person having knowledge of various departments. In short, you respect your boss and are looking forward to lean a lot from him. Since you have good tuning with the boss, he started depending on you. One day due to ill health he invited you at his place for finishing some urgent work. You reached his house and before you could ring the bell you heard shouting noises. You waited for a while. After entering the house the boss greeted you and explained the work. But you were constantly disturbed by the crying of a woman. At last, you inquired with the boss but his answer did not satisfy you. Next day, you were compelled to inquire further in the office and found out that his behavior is very bad at home with his wife. He also beats up bit wife. His wife is not well educated and is a simple woman in comparison to her husband. you see that though your boss is a nice person in the office, he is engaged in domestic violence at home. In such a situation, you are left with the following options. Analyse each option with its consequences. (a) Just ignore thinking about it because it is their personal matter. (b) Repost the case to the appropriate authority. (c) Your own innovative approach towards situation. -
2015 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. One of the scientists working in the R & D laboratory of a major pharmaceutical company discovers that one of the company's best selling veterinary drugs, B has the potential to cure a currently incurable liver disease that is prevalent in tribal areas. However, developing a variant of the drug suitable for human beings entailed a lot of research and development having a huge expenditure to the extent of f 50 crores. It was unlikely that the company would recover the costs as the disease was rampant only in poverty-stricken area having very little market otherwise. If you were the CEO, then- (a) identify the various actions that you could take; (b) evaluate the pros and cons of each of your actions. -
2015 · Q10 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. There is a disaster-prone State having frequent landslides, forest fires, cloudbursts, flash floods and earthquakes, etc. Some of these are seasonal and often unpredictable. The magnitude of the disaster is always unanticipated. During one of the seasons, a cloudburst caused devastating floods and landslides leading to high casualties. There was major damage to infrastructure like roads, bridges and power generating units. This led to more than 100000 pilgrims, tourists and other locals trapped across different routes and locations. The people trapped in your area of responsibility included senior citizens, patients in hospitals, women and children, hikers, tourists, ruling party's regional president along with his family, additional chief secretary of the neighbouring State and prisoners in jail. As a civil services officer of the State, what would be the order in which you would rescue these people and why? Give justifications. -
2015 · Q11 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. You are heading a district administration in a particular department. Your senior officer calls you from the State Headquarters and tells you that a plot in Rampur village is to have a building constructed on it for a school. A visit is scheduled during which he will visit the site along with the chief engineer and the senior architect. He wants you to check out all the papers relating to it and to ensure that the visit is properly arranged. You examine the file which relates to the period before you joined the department. The land was acquired from the local Panchayat at a nominal cost and the papers show that clearance certificates are available from the two of the three authorities who have to certify the site's suitability. There is no certification by the architect available on file. You decide to visit Rampur to ensure that all is in order as stated on file. When you visit Rampur, you find that the plot under reference is part of Thakurgarh Fort and that the walls, ramparts, etc., are running across it. The fort is well away from the main village, therefore a school here will be a serious inconvenience for the children. However, the area near the village has potential to expand into a larger residential area. The development charges on the existing plot, at the fort, will be very high and the question of heritage site has not been addressed. Moreover, the Sarpanch, at the time of acquisition of the land, was a relative of your predecessor. The whole transaction appears to have been done with some vested interest. (a) List the likely vested interests of the concerned parties. (b) Some of the options for action available to you are listed below. Discuss the merits and demerits of each of the options: You can await the visit of the superior officer and let him take a decision. You can seek his advice in writing or on phone. You can consult your predecessor/colleagues, etc., and then decide what to do. You can find out if any alternate plot can be got in exchange and then send a comprehensive written report. Can you suggest any other option with proper justification?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · GS IV · 10 marks
Explain how ethics contributes to social and human well-being
Probity in Governance
Ethics is the inner standard of right conduct when law is absent or easy to dodge. Social well-being needs trust, fairness, compassion and civic virtue, which ethics supplies cheaper than police. Human well-being needs dignity, integrity, empathy and self-control, not only income. Professional and environmental ethics turn skill into care for people and for the next generation. Without ethics, society spends more on force and the person lives with a damaged conscience.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · GS IV · 10 marks
Why should impartiality and nonpartisanship be considered as foundational values in public services, especially in the present day socio-political context? Illustrate your answer with examples.
Probity in Governance
Impartiality is equal treatment by law and facts; non-partisanship is service to the Constitution rather than to a party. They are foundational because every other skill becomes a tool of faction if they are missing. Today’s socio-political heat — identity, social media, coalitions and punitive transfers — makes them both harder and more necessary. Illustrations include election duty, communal policing, welfare lists, recruitment and disaster camps. Conduct Rules, speaking orders, RTI and stable tenure are the practical supports.
Q2(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · GS IV · 10 marks
What do you understand by the terms 'governance', 'good governance' and 'ethical governance'?
Ethics and Human Interface
Governance is the process of steering public and related power, wider than the cabinet alone. Good governance is a quality standard: rule of law, participation, transparency, equity, efficiency and accountability. Ethical governance tests ends and means by honesty, impartiality, compassion and constitutional dignity. Efficiency at harm is not ethical; private kindness inside a corrupt system is not ethical governance either. A civil servant must join process, performance and conscience.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.