Q7 · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2016 · GS IV · 12 marks · 3 min read

← Q6 Q8 →

Anger is a harmful negative emotion. It is injurious to both personal life and work life. (a) Discuss how it leads to negative emotions and undesirable behaviors. (b) How can hit be managed and controlled?

Topic: Ethics and Human Interface. Syllabus: Ethics and Human Interface: Essence, determinants and consequences of Ethics in-human actions; dimensions of ethics; ethics — in private and public relationships. Human Values — lessons from the lives and teachings of great leaders, reformers and administrators; role of family, society and educational institutions in inculcating values. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2016 and Ethics and Human Interface.

Revision summary

Anger as a habit injures body, attention, family and the workplace. It feeds shame, rumination, hatred, domestic cruelty and biased or violent official acts. Firmness is not the same as rage. Control uses pause, cognitive reappraisal, sleep and health, structured hearings, emotional-intelligence skill, counselling if needed, and apology. The State must not inherit the officer’s ego.

Model answer

Introduction

Anger is a surge that says a boundary was crossed. Used as a brief signal it can protect. As a habit it injures body, family and the file. Part (a) traces the chain into other dark feelings and bad acts. Part (b) is control as a civil-service skill, not as saintliness.

Body

(a) How anger feeds other harms

  • Physiologically, anger raises heart rate and narrows attention. The person sees an enemy, not a problem, which is already a cognitive injury.
  • It breeds secondary emotions: after the shout comes shame, then anxiety about retaliation, then a sulk that looks like depression.
  • Rumination turns one insult into a story of humiliation, which feeds hatred and, in public life, communal or office faction.
  • Undesirable behaviour at home: harsh words, smashed objects, and domestic violence. The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 exists because anger is often used as a right over a weaker person.
  • At work: a shouting officer humiliates a clerk, cooks a biased noting, or orders a lathi when a hearing was due. That is cruelty and, often, a Conduct Rules breach.
  • Road rage, communal rumour-forwarding, and revenge transfers are anger as policy.
  • Addiction and sarcasm are quieter children of unmanaged anger.
  • For the organisation, chronic anger destroys psychological safety: bad news stops travelling, so the next disaster is a surprise.
  • Anger is not the same as firmness. A calm refusal of a bribe is not anger. A smashed phone after a bribe offer is anger that has already lost the file.

(b) Managing and controlling anger

  • Name it early: a racing heart and a tight jaw are data. Pause before speech. The ten-second delay is an ethical tool.
  • Cognitive reappraisal: ask what fact, not what insult, is on the table. A delayed file may be overload, not a plot.
  • Body: sleep, food, exercise, and no alcohol as fuel. Tired officers are angry officers.
  • Communication: use a first-person description of the problem, not a character attack. Write the note after the pulse drops.
  • Empathy: the petitioner’s shout is often fear. Meeting fear with a roar creates a mob.
  • Institutional design: hearings with time slots, a colleague in the room, and a rule that no major punitive order is signed in a rage.
  • Training in emotional intelligence as Goleman described it: self-awareness, self-regulation, then social skill.
  • If anger is a pattern, seek medical and counselling help. Hypertension and depression ride with chronic rage.
  • Meditation, sport, and a trusted peer review of one’s own outbursts work if they are regular, not a retreat photograph.
  • In public order, the officer’s anger must not become the State’s anger. Use law, not ego, when a crowd abuses you.
  • Apology after a wrong shout is control, not weakness. Repeating the shout because one is senior is failure.

Work rule

  • Firmness on the rule, softness on the person.
  • If you cannot be firm without rage, recuse from that hour’s hearing and return with a colleague.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  ANG[Anger] --> NAR[Narrow attention]
  NAR --> SEC[Shame hatred rumination]
  SEC --> HOME[Harm at home]
  SEC --> WORK[Humiliation and biased file]
  PAUSE[Pause and reappraisal] --> FIRM[Firm on rule]
  FIRM --> SAFE[Safe decision]

Conclusion

Anger spreads into shame, hatred and violence at home and into humiliation and biased orders at work. Control is pause, reappraisal, body care, structured hearings and the courage to apologise. An officer’s temper is a public risk, not a private hobby.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2017 · Q3 · GS IV · 10 marks

    Young people with ethical conduct are not willing to come forward to join active politics. Suggest steps to motivate them to come forward. (150 Words, 10).

    View answer →

  2. 2017 · Q4 · GS IV · 10 marks

    (a) One of the tests of integrity is complete refusal to be compromised. Explain with reference to a real life example. (150 Words, 10) (b) Corporate social responsibility makes companies more profitable and sustainable. Analyse. (150 Words, 10).

    View answer →

  3. 2017 · Q7 · GS IV · 10 marks

    (a) The crisis of ethical values in modern times is traced to a narrow perception of the good life. Discuss. (150 Words, 10) (b) Increased national wealth did not result in equitable distribution of its benefits. It has created only some "enclaves of modernity and prosperity for a small minority at the cost of the majority." Justify. (150 Words, 10).

    View answer →

  4. 2017 · Q8 · GS IV · 10 marks

    (a) Discipline generally implies following the order and subordination. However, it may be counter-productive for the organisation. Discuss. (150 Words, 10) (b) Without commonly shared and widely entrenched moral values and obligations, neither the law, nor democratic government, nor even the market economy will function properly. What do you understand by this statement? Explain with illustration in the contemporary times. (150 Words, 10).

    View answer →

  5. 2016 · Q2(a) · GS IV · 10 marks

    What do you understand by the terms 'governance', 'good governance' and 'ethical governance'?

    View answer →

  6. 2016 · Q5 · GS IV · 12 marks

    Law and ethics are considered to be the two tools for controlling human conduct so as to make it conducive to civilized social existence. (a) Discuss how they achieve this objective. (b) Giving examples, show how the two differ in their approaches.

    View answer →

  7. 2015 · Q1 · GS IV · 12 marks

    (a) What is meant by 'environmental ethics'? Why is it important to study? Discuss any one environmental issue from the viewpoint of environmental ethics. (10) (b) Differentiate between the following (10 marks) (200 Words) (i) Law and ethics (ii) Ethical management and management of ethics (iii) Discrimination and preferential treatment (iv) Personal Ethics and Professional Ethics.

    View answer →

  8. 2015 · Q7 · GS IV · 12 marks

    At the international level, bilateral relations between most nations are governed on the policy of promoting one's own national interest without any regard for the interest of other nations. This leads to conflicts and tension between the nations. How can ethical consideration help resolve such tensions? Discuss with specific examples. (10 Marks).

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · GS IV · 10 marks

Explain how ethics contributes to social and human well-being

Probity in Governance

Ethics is the inner standard of right conduct when law is absent or easy to dodge. Social well-being needs trust, fairness, compassion and civic virtue, which ethics supplies cheaper than police. Human well-being needs dignity, integrity, empathy and self-control, not only income. Professional and environmental ethics turn skill into care for people and for the next generation. Without ethics, society spends more on force and the person lives with a damaged conscience.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · GS IV · 10 marks

Why should impartiality and nonpartisanship be considered as foundational values in public services, especially in the present day socio-political context? Illustrate your answer with examples.

Probity in Governance

Impartiality is equal treatment by law and facts; non-partisanship is service to the Constitution rather than to a party. They are foundational because every other skill becomes a tool of faction if they are missing. Today’s socio-political heat — identity, social media, coalitions and punitive transfers — makes them both harder and more necessary. Illustrations include election duty, communal policing, welfare lists, recruitment and disaster camps. Conduct Rules, speaking orders, RTI and stable tenure are the practical supports.

Q2(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · GS IV · 10 marks

What do you understand by the terms 'governance', 'good governance' and 'ethical governance'?

Ethics and Human Interface

Governance is the process of steering public and related power, wider than the cabinet alone. Good governance is a quality standard: rule of law, participation, transparency, equity, efficiency and accountability. Ethical governance tests ends and means by honesty, impartiality, compassion and constitutional dignity. Efficiency at harm is not ethical; private kindness inside a corrupt system is not ethical governance either. A civil servant must join process, performance and conscience.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.