Q5 · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2015 · GS IV · 12 marks · 3 min read

← Q4 Q6 →

Two different kinds of attitudes exhibited by public servants towards their work have been identified as bureaucratic attitude and the democratic attitude. (10 Marks) (a) Distinguish between these two terms and write their merits and demerits. (b) Is it possible to balance the two to create a better administration for the faster development of our country?

Topic: Attitude. Syllabus: Attitude: content, structure, function; its influence and relation with thought and behaviour; moral and political attitudes; social influence and persuasion. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2015 and Attitude.

Revision summary

Bureaucratic attitude is rule-and-hierarchy first; it gives predictability and can freeze into red tape. Democratic attitude is citizen-first within law; it gives dignity and can collapse into crowd-pleasing illegality. Merits and demerits are twins: impersonality can be fairness or cruelty. Balance is possible: simple published rules, timelines, e-service, hearings and speaking orders. Faster development needs decisions that are both lawful and humane, not a war between the two habits.

Model answer

Introduction

The same khaki file can be a wall or a door. Bureaucratic attitude and democratic attitude are two habits toward that file. Development needs a balance, not a slogan that abolishes rules.

Body

(a) Distinction, merits, demerits

  • Bureaucratic attitude is rule-first, hierarchy-first, and paper-first. The citizen is a case. The clock of the office matters more than the clock of the queue.
  • Democratic attitude is citizen-first within the law: hearing, explanation, equality, and a sense that power is borrowed from the republic.
  • Max Weber described bureaucracy as specialised, impersonal and rule-bound. That impersonality can be fairness. It can also be coldness.
  • Merits of bureaucratic attitude: predictability, a trail for audit, less open favouritism if rules are real, continuity when ministers change, and a brake on a populist illegal order.
  • Demerits: delay, red tape, treating the poor as illiterate nuisances, hiding behind “the rule” when a lawful discretion could help, and ritual over result.
  • Merits of democratic attitude: dignity at the counter, feedback, social audit, willingness to explain in the local language, and schemes that match need.
  • Demerits: if “democratic” is misread as pleasing whoever shouts, rules collapse, majorities bully minorities, and an officer becomes a local politician in a government chair.
  • A purely bureaucratic office will not hear a disabled applicant who cannot climb the stairs. A purely “democratic” office may skip the tender because a crowd wants a favourite contractor.

(b) Can they be balanced for faster development?

  • Yes. The balance is Weber plus Gandhi: firm rules that are simple, and a face that is human.
  • Faster development fails when files sleep and when files are sold. Both attitudes, unmixed, produce one of those two.
  • Practical mix: published standard operating procedures and timelines (bureaucratic clarity) plus help-desks, online tracking and hearings for the affected (democratic access).
  • Sevottam and citizen charters tried this mix: a promise of service, a time limit, and a complaint path.
  • E-governance cuts the rude clerk without abolishing the rule. Direct benefit transfer is impersonal in a good bureaucratic sense and democratic in reaching the named person.
  • Training should reward speaking orders that are kind and lawful, not only minutes that are long.
  • Political executive must stop using “democratic pressure” to smash a tender, and stop using “procedure” to bury a drought.
  • For faster development, the officer needs courage to decide inside the rule, and humility to explain the rule to the last person in the line.
  • The Second Administrative Reforms Commission asked for citizen-centric administration, which is this balance in one phrase.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  BUR[Bureaucratic attitude] --> RULE[Rules trail audit]
  DEM[Democratic attitude] --> CIT[Citizen dignity]
  RULE --> MIX[Citizen-centric administration]
  CIT --> MIX
  MIX --> DEV[Faster fair development]

Conclusion

Bureaucratic attitude gives a spine of rules. Democratic attitude gives a spine of dignity. Development needs both: a file that moves on time, and a citizen who is not treated as dirt. That mix is possible and is already named in citizen charters and e-service.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2025 · Q3 · GS IV · 10 marks

    (a) "Those who in trouble untroubled are, Will trouble trouble itself." - Thiruvalluvar. (b) "The greatest discovery of my generation is that a human being can alter his life by altering his attitudes." - William James. (c) "The strength of a society is not in its laws, but in the morality of its people." - Swami Vivekananda.

    View answer →

  2. 2021 · Q4 · GS IV · 10 marks

    (a) Attitude is an important component that goes as input in the development of human beings. How to build a suitable attitude needed for a public servant? (b) In case of a crisis of conscience does emotional intelligence help to overcome the same without compromising the ethical and moral stand that you are likely to follow? Critically examine.

    View answer →

  3. 2020 · Q4 · GS IV · 10 marks

    (a) Distinguish between laws and rules. Discuss the role of ethics in formulating them (b) A positive attitude is considered to be an essential characteristic of a civil servant who is often required to function under extreme stress. What contributes to a positive attitude in a person?

    View answer →

  4. 2016 · Q6 · GS IV · 12 marks

    Our attitudes towards life, work, other people and society are generally shaped unconsciously by the family and the social surroundings in which we grow up. Some of these unconsciously acquired attitudes and values are often undesirable in the citizens of a modern democratic and egalitarian society. (a) Discuss such undesirable values prevalent in Today's educated Indians. (b) How can such undesirable attitudes be changed and socio-ethical values considered necessary in public services be cultivated in the aspiring and serving civil servants?

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS IV · 12 marks

(a) What is meant by 'environmental ethics'? Why is it important to study? Discuss any one environmental issue from the viewpoint of environmental ethics. (10) (b) Differentiate between the following (10 marks) (200 Words) (i) Law and ethics (ii) Ethical management and management of ethics (iii) Discrimination and preferential treatment (iv) Personal Ethics and Professional Ethics.

Ethics and Human Interface

Environmental ethics judges human use of nature by duty to other beings and to future people, not only by this year’s profit. It matters because power and markets can destroy a river faster than custom can stop them; the dam and displacement case is one test. Law is enforceable rule; ethics is the wider right, which may bind when the law is silent or too thin. Ethical management is lived fairness; management of ethics is codes and cells that support it. Discrimination is harmful bias; preferential treatment is a limited constitutional correction. Personal ethics is private conscience; professional ethics is the duty of the chair.

Q2 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS IV · 12 marks

Given are two quotations of moral thinkers/philosophers. For each of these bring out what it means to you in the present context. (a) "The weak can never forgive; forgiveness is the attribute of strong." (10) (b) "We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light" (10 marks).

Moral Thinkers and Philosophers

Forgiveness is the choice of someone who could retaliate and does not need revenge to remain whole. It is not a command that victims of grave crime hug offenders; justice can come first. In public life, strength is a firm file without spite, and peace after law, not a blood feud. Fear of the light is adult refusal of truth, RTI, science and dissent. The tragedy is punishing the lamp; administration should default to openness, not to a locked cupboard.

Q3 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS IV · 12 marks

(a) "A mere compliance with law is not enough, the public servant also have to have a well developed sensibility to ethical issues for effective discharge of duties" Do you agree? Explain with the help of two examples where (i) an act is ethically right, but not legally and (ii) an act is legally right, but not ethically. (10 Marks) (b) How do the virtues of trustworthiness and fortitude get manifested in public service? Explain with examples (10).

Probity in Governance

Legal compliance is a minimum; ethical sensibility is needed where the section is silent or a paper lie looks complete. An act can be ethically right and legally incomplete, as in a narrowly recorded rescue in a disaster. An act can be legally regular and ethically wrong, as in paying a technically perfect false muster. Trustworthiness is being reliable in figures, promises and impartiality. Fortitude is lasting courage to record a lawful no; together they make public service more than a Gazette.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.