Revision summary
EIA is a public process: hearing, appraisal, clearance and compliance. Activists influence it through hearings, RTI, NGT or Supreme Court cases, and Forest Rights gram sabhas. Silent Valley: KSSP-led campaign stopped a Kerala hydel dam; the valley became a national park. Narmada Bachao Andolan put displacement at the centre of Sardar Sarovar; the World Bank left; the Court allowed height with rehabilitation conditions. Vedanta’s Niyamgiri mine was refused by Dongria Kondh gram sabhas after the 2013 Supreme Court order. Sterlite Tuticorin was shut by Tamil Nadu after the 2018 protests and firing over expansion and pollution.
Model answer
Introduction
- An Environmental Impact Assessment is supposed to be a public argument: what a dam, a mine, a smelter or a steel plant will do to forest, river and people, and whether that cost is acceptable. NGOs and activists enter that argument with hearings, petitions, science notes and street pressure. They cannot stamp a clearance. They can delay, condition, reroute or kill a project when the record is weak or the community is unwilling.
Body
How the influence works
Under the EIA notification, a major project needs scoping, a public hearing, an appraisal and a clearance, with later compliance. Activists use the hearing to put local knowledge on the minutes. They use the Right to Information and leaked draft EIAs to show copy-paste biology. They move the National Green Tribunal and the Supreme Court when a hearing was a farce or a sacred grove was listed as wasteland. They organise gram sabhas where the Forest Rights Act requires consent. The influence is therefore procedural and political: a better EIA, a set of conditions, a refusal, or a project that dies because finance will not wait. Capture is the other side: a weak NGO can also be sued into silence, and a loud campaign can over-claim. The four cases below are ones where the public record is clear.
- Peg: Public hearing minutes and FRA gram sabhas are the lawful hooks; courts are the backstop when those hooks are skipped.
- Peg: Media and science collectives (as in Silent Valley) can change a Union Cabinet’s mind before a modern EIA code even existed.
Four cases
Silent Valley, Kerala. A State hydel project in a rainforest valley was opposed from the 1970s by the Kerala Sastra Sahitya Parishad, poets and the Save Silent Valley campaign. They argued extinction risk for a unique evergreen tract, including the lion-tailed macaque habitat. Indira Gandhi’s government stopped the dam. The area became Silent Valley National Park in the 1980s. It is the template: science plus a popular movement, before the 1994 EIA notification, still deciding a “development” outcome.
Narmada / Sardar Sarovar. The Narmada Bachao Andolan, with Medha Patkar and allied groups, used satyagraha, the Morse independent review for the World Bank, and long Supreme Court litigation to contest displacement and the height of Sardar Sarovar. The Bank stepped back. The Supreme Court eventually allowed raising the dam with rehabilitation conditions, so the activists did not “win a no-dam world”, but they forced rehabilitation onto the clearance bargain and made EIA-style social impact a national argument.
Vedanta bauxite, Niyamgiri, Odisha. Dongria Kondh Adivasis, with activists and later Amnesty and local groups, opposed Vedanta’s bauxite mine on a hill they hold sacred. The Supreme Court in 2013 required gram sabhas to decide. The sabhas refused. The mine did not go ahead. That is FRA plus EIA logic in one holding: a forest community can say no, and an appraisal that skips that no is not a real clearance.
Sterlite copper, Thoothukudi (Tuticorin), Tamil Nadu. Neighbourhood groups and environmental activists long alleged SO2 and effluent harm from Vedanta’s Sterlite smelter. After a proposed expansion, May 2018 protests met police firing and deaths. The State government ordered permanent closure. Courts have since wrestled with that order, but the EIA-expansion path was broken by mass local refusal, not by a quiet expert committee. (A parallel Odisha story is POSCO’s Jagatsinghpur steel-port plan, opposed over betel-vine land and forest clearance; the company exited. Niyamgiri remains the cleaner Supreme Court peg.)
- Peg: Silent Valley and Niyamgiri show a project stopped. Narmada shows conditions and a national debate. Sterlite shows a working plant shut after a public rupture.
- Peg: Influence is not a veto in every statute; it is the conversion of a hearing into a political fact the appraiser cannot honestly ignore.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD E[EIA hearing] --> A[NGOs and locals] A --> C[Courts FRA sabhas] C --> S[Stop condition or close] SV[Silent Valley] --> S NY[Niyamgiri] --> S ST[Sterlite] --> S
Conclusion
NGOs and activists shape EIA outcomes through hearings, FRA sabhas, courts and public cost. Silent Valley, Narmada, Niyamgiri and Sterlite Tuticorin show stoppage, conditions, community refusal and closure. A major project that treats them as noise produces a clearance that does not survive contact with the ground.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Explain how narco-terrorism has emerged as a serious threat across the country. Suggest suitable measures to counter narco-terrorism.
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q9). View answer →
-
Can an NGO legally veto an EIA clearance?
Not as a private veto. It can make the hearing honest, sue on procedure, and, under FRA, a gram sabha can refuse forest diversion in the Niyamgiri sense.
-
Did NBA stop Sardar Sarovar?
No. It changed the terms: rehabilitation, height fights, and the exit of World Bank lending. The dam was built higher under court-set conditions.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS III · 10 marks
Examine the pattern and trend of public expenditure on Social Services in the post-reforms period in India. To what extent this has been in consonance with achieving the objective of inclusive growth?( ).
Inclusive Growth
After 1991, social-services spending did not jump at once; it thickened from the mid-2000s with school, health, work and food missions. States spend more on social services than the Union; education is the largest slice and health is smaller. The direction matches inclusive growth: more public money on people, not only on factories. The match is incomplete because learning, public health and out-of-pocket medical costs still exclude many. Inclusive growth is tested by who is reached, not by the size of a budget head alone.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS III · 10 marks
What are the causes of persistent high food inflation in India? Comment on the effectiveness of the monetary policy of RBI to control this type of inflation.
Indian Economy
Indian food inflation is kept high by weather, perishable supply chains, rising protein demand, cereal floors and edible-oil imports. It is mainly a supply and market problem, not a pure money problem. RBI repo hikes cool demand and second-round wage effects; they do not grow a crop. Flexible inflation targeting still must watch food because food sits inside CPI. First-best tools are buffers, storage, timed imports and better mandis; monetary policy is the anchor.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS III · 10 marks
What were the factors responsible for the successful implementation of land reforms in some parts of the country? Elaborate.
Land Reforms
Successful land reform needed political will, peasant organisation and records that named the tiller. West Bengal’s Operation Barga and Kerala’s occupancy reforms are the standard successful cases; early J&K also went far on ceilings. Zamindari abolition was wide; ceiling and tenancy security were not. Benami, litigation and informal tenancy explain failure in much of the heartland. A gazette cannot substitute for a union and a mutation register.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.