Q19 · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2021 · GS II · 15 marks · 3 min read

← Q18 Q20 →

Critically examine the aims and objectives of SCO. what importance does it hold for India.

Topic: Bilateral and Regional Groupings. Syllabus: Bilateral, regional and global groupings and agreements involving India and/or affecting India’s interests. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2021 and Bilateral and Regional Groupings.

Revision summary

SCO’s aims are regional security, the ‘three evils’, and economic-connectivity cooperation under a China–Russia-centred Eurasian tent. RATS is the concrete security limb; trade and a development-bank story have lagged BRI. Terror definitions split, especially India–Pakistan; consensus yields thin communiqués. For India, importance is Central Asia, strategic autonomy beside the Quad, and a limited China channel. Do not treat SCO as a court against Pakistan or as a settlement mechanism for the LAC.

Model answer

Introduction

The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation grew from the Shanghai Five (1996) into a Eurasian grouping with China and Russia at the core and India and Pakistan as members from 2017. Its stated aims are security, connectivity and a multipolar order. For India the table is valuable; the meal is often thin, and China–Pakistan politics is the salt that spoils it.

Body

Stated aims and objectives

  • The SCO Charter lists regional peace, security and stability, the fight against terrorism, separatism and extremism — the ‘three evils’ — plus trade, energy, transport and cultural cooperation.
  • The Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure (RATS) in Tashkent is the operational security limb; annual summits and a thickening set of ministers are the political limb.
  • A deeper, less written aim is to organise Eurasia with China and Russia as convenors, offering members an alternative to Western-led security and finance clubs.
  • Expansion to India, Pakistan, and later Iran, advertises SCO as a big-tent of the ‘non-West’, not a small Central Asian border club.

Critical examination

  • Counter-terror language is real in exercises and RATS lists, yet members do not share a definition of terrorism when it touches each other’s partners; India–Pakistan divergence is the obvious crack.
  • Economic aims — a development bank conversation, energy club, and connectivity — have under-delivered beside Belt and Road, which is a China project that SCO communiqués often bless in spirit.
  • Sovereignty and non-interference are official norms; they also shelter members from discussing each other’s human-rights records, so the organisation is a states’ club, not a citizens’ one.
  • China–Russia leadership is structural: agenda, finance, and diplomatic weight are not equal among eight or more flags. Multipolarity here can mean bipolar Eurasia with guests.
  • Consensus culture avoids walkouts but produces lowest-common-denominator statements that rarely bind a PLA or a Taliban-era Afghan spillover.

Importance for India

  • Central Asia: SCO is one of the few regular rooms where India sits with Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Russia on terror, drugs, and connectivity (Chabahar, INSTC) without a Western chair.
  • Strategic autonomy: membership balances Quad and Western minilaterals with a Eurasian file; it is not a substitute for the Quad, and it should not be.
  • China: a channel for engagement even after Galwan, useful for signalling, limited for settlement of the LAC.
  • Pakistan: a constrained multilateral space; RATS can name groups, but SCO will not become India’s preferred counter-terror court against Islamabad.
  • Energy and connectivity: talk of corridors and hydrocarbons matters if Indian firms actually move; otherwise importance stays diplomatic.
  • Recommendation: use SCO for RATS, Central Asian diplomacy, and connectivity that does not run only through BRI; keep hard security with other partners when SCO consensus is China-shaped.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  AIM[SCO peace three evils connectivity] --> RATS[RATS Tashkent]
  AIM --> MP[Multipolar Eurasia]
  CR[China Russia core] --> SCO[SCO table]
  IN[India 2017] --> CA[Central Asia energy autonomy]
  PK[Pakistan divergence] --> LIM[Limited terror consensus]
  CA --> IMP[Importance for India]
  LIM --> IMP

Conclusion

SCO aims at Eurasian security, anti-terror cooperation and a multipolar economic space, but it is critically a China–Russia-led consensus club with a soft economic spine and a cracked terror definition. For India it is important as a Central Asian and autonomy-preserving table, not as a substitute for bilateral China policy or for the Quad. Sit in the room; do not outsource the hard files to the communiqué.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2023 · Q9 · GS II · 10 marks

    'Virus of Conflict is affecting the functioning of the SCO'. In the light of the above statement point out the role of India in mitigating problems.

    View answer →

  2. 2022 · Q10 · GS II · 10 marks

    Do you think that BIMSTEC is a parallel organisation like the SAARC ? What are the similarities and dissimilarities between the two ? How are Indian foreign policy objectives realized by forming this new organisation ?

    View answer →

  3. 2020 · Q19 · GS II · 15 marks

    'Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD)' is the transforming itself into a trade bloc from a military alliance, in present times - Discuss.

    View answer →

  4. 2016 · Q19 · GS II · 12 marks

    "Increasing cross-border terrorist attacks in India and growing interference in the internal affairs of member-states by Pakistan are not conducive for the future of SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation)." Explain with suitable examples.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2021 · GS II · 10 marks

'Constitutional Morality' is rooted in the Constitution itself and is founded on its essential facets. Explain the doctrine of 'Constitutional Morality' with the help of relevant judicial decisions.

Indian Constitution

Constitutional morality is fidelity to liberty, equality, dignity and the rule of law in the Constitution itself. Kesavananda (1973) locked those essential facets as basic structure. Navtej Johar (2018) preferred constitutional morality over social morality on Section 377. Indian Young Lawyers Association (Sabarimala, 2018) tested temple exclusion against Articles 14, 15, 17 and 25. NCT of Delhi (2018) used the doctrine to restrain a parallel Lieutenant Governor against an elected government.

Q2 · UPSC Mains 2021 · GS II · 10 marks

Discuss the desirability of greater representation to women in the higher judiciary to ensure diversity, equity and inclusiveness.

Executive and Judiciary

Women remain under-represented on Supreme Court and High Court benches despite a large pool at the Bar. Diversity improves judging in gender, family and workplace cases; equity and inclusiveness are Articles 14–16 values the Court itself enforces. The filter is informal networks and seniority practice, not a constitutional ban. Publish data, widen the district-judge and senior-advocate pool, and name gender diversity as a collegium criterion. Inclusion is about legitimacy of the Bench, not about a single judicial ideology.

Q3 · UPSC Mains 2021 · GS II · 10 marks

How have the recommendations of the 14th Finance Commission of India enabled the states to improve their fiscal position?

Governance and Policy

The 14th Finance Commission raised States’ share in the divisible pool from 32 to 42 per cent for 2015–20. Untied devolution, not only CSS, let States fund their own priorities and borrow on a more predictable base. Horizontal criteria helped poorer and forested States; revenue-deficit grants closed residual gaps. Local-body and disaster grants reduced raids on State revenue for third-tier and calamity costs. Cesses outside the pool and later GST shocks limited the gain; the 15th FC kept devolution near that high watermark at 41 per cent.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.