Revision summary
Transparency International's index is a perception score, but it matches weak public morality in office. Legal delay, sanction hurdles and licence discretion lower the cost of corruption. Election expense, criminal candidates and patronage politics set a bad example. Society often pays speed money and expects caste or kin favours from officials. Cultural habits of bakshish, status and jugaad excuse the decline unless shame and speedy trial return.
Model answer
Introduction
Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index has often placed India in the lower half of the table. A low rank is not a court finding, but it matches a public sense that office is used for private gain. Public morality is the habit of treating public money and public power as a trust. Legal gaps, political incentives, social tolerance of the 'known person', and cultural excuses have together worn that habit down.
Body
Legal factors
- Laws against corruption exist: the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002, and service rules. Enforcement is slow. Trials last years, so the fear of punishment is weak.
- Until the 2018 amendment line, the older PCA made even a genuine official hesitant, while the big bribe-giver often escaped. Sanction to prosecute under Section 19 delayed cases against serving officers.
- Election law still allows large, poorly traced campaign spend. The Representation of the People Act punishes some corrupt practices, but black money in polls is hard to prove.
- A crowded statute book with licences, inspections and discretion creates rent. Where a clerk can delay a file, morality is tested every day.
- Whistle-blower protection and a strong, independent anti-corruption body with all-India reach remain incomplete. The Lokpal took years to become a working office after the 2013 Act.
Political factors
- High cost of elections pushes parties and candidates toward undeclared funds and toward donors who later want contracts or posts.
- Criminalisation of politics, recorded in successive Association for Democratic Reforms studies of affidavits, normalises the idea that a charge-sheet is not a bar to office.
- Patronage and the transfer-posting industry teach the cadre that loyalty to a minister can matter more than the rule book.
- Coalition arithmetic and horse-trading, including misuse of office-of-profit and floor-crossing before the Tenth Schedule bite, display public office as a bargain.
- Weak inner-party democracy means tickets are sold or gifted, not earned by clean local work.
Social factors
- Citizens often pay a speed money to get a ration card, a caste certificate or a police FIR, and then treat it as a service charge rather than a crime.
- Kinship, caste and community networks expect an official to 'help his own'. That social claim collides with equal treatment under Article 14.
- Low social shame for conspicuous wealth of a modest-salary officer, unless a sting appears on television, reduces informal control.
- Unequal access to courts and to English paperwork leaves the poor with the tout as their only broker.
Cultural factors
- A long memory of the bakshish, the gift to the official, and the idea of the mai-baap sarkar still colours the counter.
- Status attached to a government post can slide into entitlement: the peon and the secretary both may see the public as petitioners, not as principals.
- Jugaad as a praised skill can become a cultural cover for bending the rule 'just this once'.
- Religious and ritual giving is honourable; the line between dana and a quid pro quo donation to a party or a temple trust linked to a minister is often blurred in public talk.
A brief join
- Law without speedy trial, politics funded in the dark, a society that pays to jump the queue, and a culture that excuses the fixer, move together. The index records the result, not the first cause.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD L[Legal delay and discretion] --> M[Decline of public morality] P[Costly criminalised politics] --> M S[Speed money and kinship] --> M C[Patron culture and jugaad] --> M M --> I[Low integrity index rank]
Conclusion
India's low place on the integrity index reflects a decline in public morality fed by slow anti-corruption law, costly and criminalised politics, everyday speed money, and a culture that still treats the official as a patron. Statutes and a Lokpal are not enough unless elections are cleaner, discretion is cut, and society stops honouring the fixer.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Has the Indian governmental system responded adequately to the demands of Liberalization, Privatization and Globalization started in 1991? What can the government do to be responsive to this important change?
Next question in the 2016 paper (Q13). View answer →
-
Does a low CPI rank prove every Indian official is corrupt?
No. It is a perceptions index built from surveys of experts and business. It is a warning about systems, not a charge-sheet against every officer.
-
Is more law the only answer?
No. India already has several anti-corruption statutes. Faster trials, cleaner election funding, less counter discretion, and social refusal to pay speed money matter as much.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2017 · Q9 · GS II · 10 marks
'China is using its economic relations and positive trade surplus as tools to develop potential military power status in Asia', In the light of this statement, discuss its impact on India as her neighbor. -
2017 · Q12 · GS II · 15 marks
Examine the scope of Fundamental Rights in the light of the latest judgement of the Supreme Court on Right to Privacy. (250 words). -
2016 · Q18 · GS II · 12 marks
Evaluate the economic and strategic dimensions of India's Look East Policy in the context of the post Cold War international scenario. -
2016 · Q20 · GS II · 12 marks
What are the aims and objectives of the McBride Commission of the UNESCO? What is India's position on these? -
2015 · Q8 · GS II · 12 marks
Examine critically the recent changes in the rule governing foreign funding of NGOs under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA), 1976. -
2015 · Q11 · GS II · 12 marks
The quality of higher education in India requires major improvement to make it internationally competitive. Do you think that the entry of foreign educational institutions would help improve the quality of technical and higher education in the country. Discuss. -
2015 · Q17 · GS II · 12 marks
Increasing interest of India in Africa has its pro and cons. Critically Examine. -
2015 · Q19 · GS II · 12 marks
Project 'Mausam' is considered a unique foreign policy initiative of Indian government to improve relationship wit its neighbours. Does the project have a strategic dimension? Discuss.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2016 · GS II · 12 marks
Discuss the essentials of the 69th Constitutional Amendment Act and anomalies, if any, that have led to recent reported conflicts between the elected representatives and the institution of the Lieutenant Governor in the administration of Delhi. Do you think that this will give rise to a new trend in the functioning of the Indian federal politics?
Federal Structure and Devolution
The 69th Amendment inserted Article 239AA and created Delhi’s Assembly and Council of Ministers, excluding police, public order and land. Ministers aid and advise the Lieutenant Governor, but a difference may be sent to the President, which became the legal hook for file delays. The GNCTD Act, 1991, and control over services widened the gap between the voters’ government and the Administrator. The clash is structural to a national-capital Union Territory, not a new model for the States. Court cases and the 2021 Amendment show competitive, litigated federalism in Delhi rather than a nationwide federal mutation.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2016 · GS II · 12 marks
To what extent is Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, bearing marginal note "temporary provision with respect to the State of Jammu and Kashmir", temporary? Discuss the future prospects of this provision in the context of Indian polity.
Indian Constitution
Article 370 is labelled temporary in Part XXI and can cease under clause (3), but the State Constituent Assembly never recommended that before it dissolved in 1957. Presidential orders, especially 1954, extended the Union Constitution while keeping the special gateway. Court practice treated the article as continuing, so it was temporary in name and durable in fact until 2019. C.O. 272, C.O. 273 and the J&K Reorganisation Act, 2019, made it inoperative; the 2023 judgment upheld that path and spoke of restoring statehood. Prospects in polity are now about statehood and ordinary federalism, not about reviving the old Article 370 as a living special status.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2016 · GS II · 12 marks
"The Indian party system is passing through a phase of transition which looks to be full of contradictions and paradoxes." Discuss.
Governance and Policy
The party system moved from Congress dominance to coalitions and then to a new national majority, without erasing State-level regional parties. Presidential campaign style collides with parliamentary collective responsibility. The Tenth and 91st Amendments curb defection and cabinet size but strengthen high commands. National and state party labels under the Symbols Order do not match the mixed federal reality. The transition is therefore full of legal and political paradoxes, not a clean model change.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.