Revision summary
Constitutional equality was not enough against tribal atrocity and forest eviction. The 1989 PoA Act creates special offences and forums against violence and humiliation of STs. The 2006 FRA recognises individual and community forest rights through the gram sabha. One law targets interpersonal caste-patterned crime; the other targets State and forest exclusion. Fifth Schedule and PESA support self-rule but the two headline initiatives remain PoA and FRA.
Model answer
Flow diagram
flowchart TD D[ST discrimination] --> V[Atrocity humiliation] D --> L[Forest land denial] V --> P[PoA Act 1989] L --> F[FRA 2006] P --> R[Legal protection] F --> R
Conclusion
- Name the two Acts clearly, then add Fifth Schedule, PCR Act 1955, and PESA only as supporting architecture.
- Stress land, forest, and bodily dignity as the three sites of tribal discrimination these laws try to reach.
Since Independence the State’s two major legal answers to ST discrimination are the 1989 Atrocities Act against violence and humiliation, and the 2006 Forest Rights Act against eviction from forest land and livelihood. Rights on paper still need courts and gram sabhas if discrimination is not to continue in fact.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
The spirit of tolerance and love is not only an interesting feature of Indian society from very early times, but it is also playing an important part at the present. Elaborate. (250 words).
Next question in the 2017 paper (Q11). View answer →
-
Is reservation one of the two initiatives asked here?
Reservation is a major constitutional tool. This 10-mark legal-initiatives question is standardly answered with the 1989 Atrocities Act and the 2006 Forest Rights Act.
-
Why not only the Fifth Schedule?
The Fifth Schedule is foundational but older and administrative. FRA and PoA are the two concrete post-Independence statutes that target atrocity and forest-land discrimination most directly.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q3 · GS I · 10 marks
Assess the main administrative issues and socio-cultural problems in the integration process of Indian Princely States. -
2016 · Q6 · GS I · 12 marks
Has the formation of linguistic states strengthened the cause of Indian unity?
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2017 · GS I · 10 marks
How do you justify the view that the level of excellence of the Gupta numismatic art is not at all noticeable in later times?
Indian Heritage and Culture
Gupta gold showed the king as archer, lyrist, or horseman with Lakshmi or ritual reverses and Brahmi verse. Metal was relatively pure and the die work was sculptural. Post-Gupta and early medieval coins often debased metal and used stiff stock types. Sultanate and Mughal art followed another visual language. The claim holds for Gupta-style numismatic art, not for all later mint skill.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2017 · GS I · 10 marks
Clarify how mid-eighteenth century India was beset with the spectre of a fragmented polity.
World's Physical Geography
After 1707 the Mughal emperor lost the capacity to rule provinces in fact. Nadir Shah and Abdali exposed Delhi’s military hollowness. Bengal, Awadh, Hyderabad, Marathas, Sikhs, and Mysore became separate armed powers. Panipat 1761 showed even the Marathas were not a single state. Company victories in the Carnatic and Bengal fitted into this broken order.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2017 · GS I · 10 marks
Why did the 'Moderates' failed to carry conviction with the nation about their proclaimed ideology and political goals by the end of the nineteenth century?
The Freedom Struggle
Moderate goals were council seats, ICS, and drain critique, not immediate independence. Methods were petitions and annual sessions that missed peasant and mill-hand life. The social base was presidency professionals speaking English public language. 1892 reforms were too small to prove the method worked. By the century’s end a hotter nationalist mood found them unconvincing.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.