Q2 · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2015 · GS I · 12 marks · 2 min read

← Q1 Q3 →

Mesolithic rock cut architecture of India not only reflects the cultural life of the times but also a fine aesthetic sense comparable to modern painting. Critically evaluate this comment.

Topic: Indian Heritage and Culture. Syllabus: Indian culture will cover the salient aspects of Art Forms, literature and Architecture from ancient to modern times. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2015 and Indian Heritage and Culture.

Revision summary

Mesolithic India left painted and engraved shelters, not cave temples. Bhimbetka and related sites show hunt, dance, and animals. Rock-cut architecture belongs to Mauryan and later religious caves. The line can look modern to us, but the makers had ritual and group aims. The comment is fair on culture, weak on architecture and on equating two art worlds.

Model answer

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  M[Mesolithic foragers] --> P[Shelter painting Bhimbetka]
  P --> C[Hunt dance ritual]
  P --> A[Lively line]
  R[Later rock-cut caves] --> X[Different craft]
  A --> Y[Modern comparison is taste]

Conclusion

  • Evaluate by splitting the comment: strong on cultural life, cautious on aesthetics, reject “rock-cut architecture” as a label for Mesolithic India.
  • Name Bhimbetka as a UNESCO rock-art landscape and keep Ajanta out of the Mesolithic box.

Mesolithic shelter painting records food, ritual, and a lively eye for animal and human form. It is not rock-cut architecture, and it is comparable to modern painting only as a later compliment, not as the same art world.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2017 · Q1 · GS I · 10 marks

    How do you justify the view that the level of excellence of the Gupta numismatic art is not at all noticeable in later times?

    View answer →

  2. 2017 · Q5 · GS I · 10 marks

    How does the Juno Mission of NASA help to understand the origin and evolution of the Earth?

    View answer →

  3. 2017 · Q11 · GS I · 15 marks

    The spirit of tolerance and love is not only an interesting feature of Indian society from very early times, but it is also playing an important part at the present. Elaborate. (250 words).

    View answer →

  4. 2016 · Q1 · GS I · 12 marks

    Early Buddhist Stupa-art, while depicting folk motifs and narratives, successfully expounds Buddhist ideals. Elucidate.

    View answer →

  5. 2016 · Q2 · GS I · 12 marks

    Krishnadeva Raya, the king of Vijayanagar, was not only an accomplished scholar himself but was a also a great patron of learning and literature. Discuss.

    View answer →

  6. 2016 · Q11 · GS I · 12 marks

    With a brief background of quality of urban life in India, introduce the objectives and strategy of the 'Smart City Programme."

    View answer →

  7. 2015 · Q1 · GS I · 12 marks

    The ancient civilization in Indian sub continent differed from those of Egypt, Mesopotamia and Greece in that its culture and traditions have been preserved without breakdown to the present day. Comment.

    View answer →

  8. 2015 · Q19 · GS I · 12 marks

    Smart cities in India cannot sustain without smart villages. Discuss this statement in the backdrop of rural urban integration.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS I · 12 marks

The ancient civilization in Indian sub continent differed from those of Egypt, Mesopotamia and Greece in that its culture and traditions have been preserved without breakdown to the present day. Comment.

Indian Heritage and Culture

India kept Sanskrit–Prakrit–vernacular, pilgrimage, and dharma as living practice. Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Greece lost their old public cults after conversion and empire. Harappan script is still unread, so the oldest urban layer is not a proven straight line. Islam, colonialism, and Partition remade custom even while older forms survived. The comment is fair as relative continuity, not as zero breakdown.

Q3 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS I · 12 marks

How difficult would have been the achievement of Indian independence without Mahatma Gandhi?

The Freedom Struggle

Gandhi built mass satyagraha from Champaran to Quit India and a daily constructive programme. Non-violence and a wide Congress made bargaining with Britain possible as a national claim. War, INA, peasants, and British weakness would still have pushed decolonisation. Partition shows his limits on communal peace. Without him freedom would likely have been bloodier and less united, not unthinkable.

Q4 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS I · 12 marks

Mahatma Gandhi and Dr. B R Ambedkar, despite having divergent approaches and strategies, had a common goal of amelioration of the downtrodden. Elucidate.

The Freedom Struggle

Both men sought dignity, education, and an end to untouchability. Gandhi relied on repentance, temple entry, and village constructive work. Ambedkar relied on law, political safeguards, and critique of Hindu caste. The Poona Pact replaced separate electorates with reserved seats after a clash. Constitutional abolition of untouchability and later Navayana Buddhism mark Ambedkar’s distinct strategy.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.