Revision summary
Globalisation links villages to distant labour, media, and crop markets. Remittances and phones are real openings. Land, artisan work, and farm risk are the main threats. Chipko and Niyamgiri show local defence against outside extraction. PESA and FRA are legal tools, not automatic shields.
Model answer
Introduction
Globalisation ties Indian villages to distant markets, media, and labour circuits. It opens cash and information, and it also strips local control over land, seed, and youth.
Body
Opportunities
- Remittances from Gulf and city work raise house quality and school fees in many dry villages, a pattern Jan Breman also documented in labour migration, though he stressed its cost.
- Mobile phones, satellite television, and rural roads cut isolation that S. C. Dube still had to travel by jeep in the Shamirpet years.
- Crop markets, dairy cooperatives, and some contract farming raise cash where irrigation and cold chains exist.
- MGNREGA and national schemes ride the same fiscal global state. They are not village autarky, but they are a buffer.
Challenges
- Cheap industrial goods and corporate retail undercut village artisans. Land conversion for highways, SEZs, and mining hits Scheduled Area hamlets despite PESA, 1996 and FRA, 2006.
- Agrarian price swings and patented seed raise risk. Youth exit hollows out farm labour, which then returns as seasonal gangs.
- Media Westernisation, in Srinivas’s sense, shifts consumption faster than local employment. Caste and gender rules may harden as a defence, or they may crack unevenly.
How to read the balance
- Chipko in the Garhwal Himalaya was an earlier defence of forest livelihood against outside extraction. Niyamgiri later showed a Gram Sabha using law against a global mining plan.
- The village of Marriott and Dube was already a part-society. Globalisation intensifies that dependence. It does not create it from zero.
Limit
- Opportunity and threat are not equal for every jati and every region. A Punjab mandi and a shifting-cultivation hamlet do not meet the same global.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD G[Globalisation] --> O[Remittance market media] G --> T[Land seed labour exit] T --> L[PESA FRA Niyamgiri]
Conclusion
Globalisation gives villages remittance, media, and some markets. It also exposes land, craft, and youth to distant price and extraction. Law such as PESA and FRA is the village’s remaining bargaining chip.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Caste and social capital
Next question on this syllabus topic (2021 · Q1(d)). View answer →
-
Is globalisation only cultural Westernisation?
No. Capital, labour, and law move too. Srinivas’s Westernisation is only one strand.
-
Do all villages lose from globalisation?
No. Irrigated commercial belts often gain cash. Forest and dryland hamlets more often lose control.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q3(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Compare and contrast the approaches of M.N. Srinivas and L.P. Vidyarthi to social change in village India. -
2024 · Q8(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Describe the important Paleolithic sites from South India with suitable examples. What is the significance of South Indian Paleolithic cultures? -
2021 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Caste and social capital -
2021 · Q4(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the role of Panchayati Raj Institutions in transforming traditional power hierarchy in rural India -
2021 · Q8(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine how structural transformation in economy is affecting traditional social relationships in agrarian society -
2016 · Q3(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Describe the traditional patterns of settlement of Indian villages -
2016 · Q4(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Compare the contribution of L. P. Vidyarthi and D. N. Majumdar to the study of Indian tribes -
2016 · Q6(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain Indian village as a social system with suitable examples
More from this topic
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Describe the important Paleolithic sites from South India with suitable examples. What is the significance of South Indian Paleolithic cultures?
Indian Village
Key sites: Attirampakkam (early dated Acheulian), Hunsgi–Baichbal and Isampur (limestone workshops), Pallavaram (Foote), Kurnool caves and Jwalapuram (later Pleistocene). South India is Acheulian country, distinct from classic Soanian cobble tools. Isampur shows organised quarrying; Attirampakkam shows great antiquity. Middle and Upper Palaeolithic appear in caves and river valleys without copying Europe’s labels. Significance is early occupation and behaviour; makers’ fossils are still scarce.
Q3(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Compare and contrast the approaches of M.N. Srinivas and L.P. Vidyarthi to social change in village India.
Indian Village
Srinivas explained village change through field view, sanskritisation, westernisation and dominant caste. Vidyarthi explained organisation and change through the sacred complex and the nature–man–spirit complex. Srinivas’s motor is internal rank-climbing plus Western and state resources. Vidyarthi’s motor is contact with development, mine, market and mission. Use both: caste plains and tribal-sacred landscapes are not one model.
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine how structural transformation in economy is affecting traditional social relationships in agrarian society
Indian Village
Structural transformation moves work toward industry and services. In India it is partial; many still live by the farm. Jajmani becomes cash contract, not a vanished caste. Migration and machines remake attached labour as gangs. Dominant-caste land and panchayat brokerage persist.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.