Revision summary
Ghurye treated tribes as backward Hindus and favoured assimilation. Elwin favoured protection of land, language, and custom, with limited isolation. Nehru’s Panchsheel and the Schedules adopted integration, not either pole alone. ITDP, PESA, and FRA are the programme face of that middle path. Mining and leakage still undercut the protective half.
Model answer
Introduction
- G. S. Ghurye and Verrier Elwin named the two poles of tribal policy: assimilation into Hindu society and protection of a distinct tribal world. The Union later wrote a middle path of integration.
Body
Ghurye
- In The Aborigines – So-Called – and Their Future, G. S. Ghurye treated tribes as backward Hindus. Isolation, he said, was a missionary and anthropologist romance.
- The approach is assimilation: roads, Hindu social reform, and an end to a separate museum people.
- He feared Elwin’s protection as a freeze that served the outsider expert more than the Adivasi.
Elwin
- Verrier Elwin argued for a measure of isolation and for protecting land, language, and shifting cultivation from diku and contractor.
- National Parks of the tribal kind, and later a gentler integration, were his policy words. Baiga and NEFA notes are the cases.
- He influenced Nehru’s thinking more than Ghurye did, even after Elwin entered state service.
Government of India policies
- Constitutional: Articles 342, 244, Fifth and Sixth Schedules, reservation, and the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes.
- Nehruvian Tribal Panchsheel: no imposition, respect for land and culture, develop through their own institutions, simple administration, and judgement by quality of human life.
- Programmes: Tribal Sub-Plan, ITDPs/ITDAs, PESA, 1996, FRA, 2006, and special schemes for Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups.
- Practice mixes Ghurye’s schools and markets with Elwin’s protective law. Mining and dams often betray both.
Limit
- Policy on paper is integration. Policy on the ground is still extraction plus welfare offices.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD GH[Ghurye assimilation] --> H[Backward Hindus] EL[Elwin protection] --> P[Land culture isolate] GOI[GOI integration] --> S[Schedule PESA FRA ITDP]
Conclusion
Ghurye wanted assimilation as Hindus. Elwin wanted protection of a tribal world. Official India chose integration through Schedule, PESA, FRA, and Sub-Plan, and still leaks that choice in the mine belt.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the issues and solutions related to the Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribe populations in India
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Did the Government choose Ghurye or Elwin?
It wrote integration. Schools follow Ghurye’s modernising push. Schedule and FRA follow Elwin’s shield.
-
Is isolation official policy now?
No. Even PVTG programmes aim at careful access, not a sealed park.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q3(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Highlight the significant contributions of B. S. Guha, Irawati Karve and S. R. K. Chopra to Indian Anthropology -
2024 · Q2(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Deconstruct the colonial history of Indian Anthropology highlighting the critical role played by the Indian Anthropologists in sustaining its autonomy. -
2024 · Q5(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Describe ILO's Convention No. 169 (1989) on Indigenous and Tribal people. Is India a signatory to it? -
2023 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically evaluate the contributions of S.C. Roy to Indian anthropology. -
2022 · Q2(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Illustrate the contribution of Irawati Karve to Indian Anthropology. Make a special mention of her literary contribution -
2022 · Q3(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Assess the contributions of S. C. Dube in Indian village studies -
2022 · Q8(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Compare the nature of tribal movements between North-East and Central India. Briefly mention the current status of existing tribal movements in these areas -
2022 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Briefly describe the anthropological perspective on development. How have anthropologists contributed in India's rural development?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Pit-dwellers of Kashmir
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Pit-dwellers of Kashmir lived in sunken Neolithic floors at Burzahom, Gufkral, and Kanispur. Houses later rose on filled pits as mud-and-rubble rectangles. Bone tools, cereals, and dog burials mark mixed subsistence. Sankalia set the valley Neolithic beside other Indian food-producing cultures. The tradition is highland and local, not an Indus copy.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Varna and Buddhism
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Varna is the four-fold Brahmanical rank by birth. Buddhism treated it as a social label, not a bar to nirvana. The sangha was open by conduct, as Ashokan dhamma also implied. Patronage still carried rank into Buddhist society. Ambedkar used that critique in the 1956 conversion.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Dharma versus Religion
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Dharma means duty and order tied to role and group. Religion names a congregational faith with creed and conversion. Kane and Dumont keep dharma as law and hierarchy, not a church. Article 25 forces Indian practice into the legal word religion. Colonial translation flattened duty, sect, and civil law into one noun.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.