Revision summary
Srinivas gave Sanskritisation, dominant caste, and Westernisation. Rampura made the Indian village a modern ethnographic object. Radcliffe-Brown’s structural-functionalism trained his method. He replaced Risley’s race types with field relations. Ghurye and Indian texts still shaped what Oxford did not supply.
Model answer
Introduction
M. N. Srinivas made Indian society a field science of caste, village, and change. British social anthropology gave him method; India gave him Sanskritisation and the dominant caste.
Body
Contributions
- Sanskritisation explained jati mobility as copy of a locally high style, not as varna theory alone.
- Dominant caste named who actually rules the village by land and numbers.
- Westernisation named the British-modern channel of change.
- Rampura fieldwork showed faction, vote, and ritual in one monograph, the model for later village studies.
British influence
- Training under A. R. Radcliffe-Brown at Oxford taught structure, field, and the social system as relations, not race types like Risley.
- The structural-functional village was a British-African transplant that Srinivas Indianised with Indology and jati.
- He kept the field ethic of Malinowski’s heirs: stay, learn the language of practice, write the system.
Limit of the influence
- British functionalism underplayed history and colonial power. Srinivas still wrote change, but slowly.
- Ghurye, his Indian teacher, and later critics added text, tribe, and inequality that Oxford did not exhaust.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD B[Radcliffe-Brown field] --> S[Srinivas] S --> K[Sanskritisation dominant caste] S --> W[Westernisation Rampura]
Conclusion
Srinivas contributed the working concepts of Indian sociology. British structural-functionalism trained his eye; Sanskritisation and dominant caste were his Indian inventions.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
What do you understand by dynamics of caste mobility? How did the concept of Sanskritization contribute to its functionality?
Next question in the 2015 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Was Srinivas only a British copy?
Method was Oxford. The key concepts were built for Indian jati and village.
-
Did he ignore tribes?
His core was caste village. Tribe entered more as Sanskritising neighbour than as Elwin’s isolate.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Caste and social capital -
2021 · Q4(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the role of Panchayati Raj Institutions in transforming traditional power hierarchy in rural India -
2021 · Q8(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine how structural transformation in economy is affecting traditional social relationships in agrarian society -
2016 · Q3(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Describe the traditional patterns of settlement of Indian villages -
2016 · Q4(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Compare the contribution of L. P. Vidyarthi and D. N. Majumdar to the study of Indian tribes -
2016 · Q6(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain Indian village as a social system with suitable examples -
2015 · Q6(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine the contribution of village studies towards the understanding of Indian social system -
2015 · Q6(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the impact of globalization on village economy in India
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Relevance of tribal Panchsheel today
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Panchsheel is Nehru’s five-point tribal ethic, shaped with Elwin. It protects genius, land-forest rights, local cadres, and human results. Ghurye’s assimilation was the rival line. PESA and FRA try to statute the same ethic. Mining and dams still test it in Fifth Schedule belts.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Sacred complex as a dimension of Indian civilization
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Vidyarthi’s sacred complex is geography, specialists, and performances at a tirtha. Gaya is the type study of sraddha and pilgrimage. It operationalises little and great tradition at a Hindu centre. Bose’s civilisational unity is visible in shared shrine maps. The model is a dimension of Indian civilisation, not only temple architecture.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
South Indian Paleoliths
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
South Indian palaeoliths centre on the Madras Acheulian of quartzite handaxes. Foote found Pallavaram in 1863 and mapped Tamil laterite industries. Attirampakkam gives a deep dated Acheulian sequence. Sankalia set the peninsula beside Narmada and Deccan sequences. The stack is local and long, not a Siwalik Soanian copy.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.