Q4(a) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2015 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks · 1 min read

← Q3 Q4 →

Critically examine the concept of communalism and its relevance for multi-religious and multiethnic polity of India

Topic: Ethno-archaeology in India. Syllabus: 1.3 Ethno-archaeology in India: The concept of ethno-archaeology; Survivals and Parallels among the hunting, foraging, fishing, pastoral and peasant communities including arts and crafts producing communities. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2015 and Ethno-archaeology in India.

Revision summary

Communalism politicises religion as a bloc against others. It is modern, fed by census and electorates, not a timeless Indian essence. Srinivas’s jati world is flatter in communal talk than in the village. It threatens a multi-religious polity by capturing the common roll. It also hides tribe and language inside a two-faith story.

Model answer

Introduction

Communalism is the political use of religious identity as a bloc that claims the state. In a multi-religious and multiethnic India it is both a colonial inheritance and a living electoral language.

Body

The concept

  • Colonial census and separate electorates taught Indians to count as Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, or Christian publics.
  • Bipan Chandra and many historians treated communalism as modern politics, not ancient faith war.
  • Anthropology adds M. N. Srinivas’s jati and Louis Dumont’s hierarchy: everyday life is ranked and mixed; communalism flattens it into two or three armies.

Relevance for the polity

  • A multi-religious republic needs Articles 25–30 and a common roll. Communalism tries to make the roll a religious census.
  • Multiethnic reality includes language, tribe, and region. Communal frames hide Fifth and Sixth Schedule questions and linguistic minorities inside a Hindu–Muslim plot.
  • Riots, personal-law fights, and conversion panics are the operational face. They punish mixed towns and mixed marriages.

Critique

  • The concept can itself become too Hindu–Muslim, ignoring caste blocs and tribal faiths.
  • Not every festival or shrine dispute is communalism. The test is whether religion is organised to capture the state against others.
  • N. K. Bose’s civilisational unity and Nehru’s civic nation are the counter-concepts: diversity housed by law, not by a single sacred majority.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  C[Communalism] --> B[Religious blocs]
  J[Jati tribe language] --> P[Plural polity]
  C --> R[Riot electoral veto]

Conclusion

Communalism remains relevant because it still converts faith into a vote and a veto. A multiethnic polity survives by keeping jati, language, and tribe visible, and by refusing a two-community state.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2016 · Q1(e) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Ethno-archaeological evidences for the survival of hunting-gathering traditions in India.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Relevance of tribal Panchsheel today

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

Panchsheel is Nehru’s five-point tribal ethic, shaped with Elwin. It protects genius, land-forest rights, local cadres, and human results. Ghurye’s assimilation was the rival line. PESA and FRA try to statute the same ethic. Mining and dams still test it in Fifth Schedule belts.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Sacred complex as a dimension of Indian civilization

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

Vidyarthi’s sacred complex is geography, specialists, and performances at a tirtha. Gaya is the type study of sraddha and pilgrimage. It operationalises little and great tradition at a Hindu centre. Bose’s civilisational unity is visible in shared shrine maps. The model is a dimension of Indian civilisation, not only temple architecture.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

South Indian Paleoliths

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

South Indian palaeoliths centre on the Madras Acheulian of quartzite handaxes. Foote found Pallavaram in 1863 and mapped Tamil laterite industries. Attirampakkam gives a deep dated Acheulian sequence. Sankalia set the peninsula beside Narmada and Deccan sequences. The stack is local and long, not a Siwalik Soanian copy.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.