Society, economy and methods 74 / 79

Band, tribe, chiefdom, state — power without a parliament

From camp suggestion to monopoly of force.

Political anthropology — revision graphic for UPSC Anthropology
Political anthropology — revision graphic for UPSC Anthropology

Key points

Bands to states

Political anthropology is power without assuming a Parliament.

  • Dunbar: ~150 stable ties; beyond that, offices and rules thicken.
  • Service: band → tribe → chiefdom → state. Band leaders suggest camps, cannot command.
  • Tribe: several bands, shared culture, segmentary lineage (Nuer; leopard-skin chief mediates without a police).
  • Age-grades (Kipsigis, Maasai): warriors and elders as political machinery without a king.
  • Melanesian big-man: achieved feasts, not blood office. Polynesian chief: mana, hierarchy, subchiefs.
  • State: monopoly of legitimate force (Weber); Fried — stratification made permanent; Cohen — offices and law.
FormLeadershipForce
BandFirst among equalsShame, leaving
TribeLineage, age-setFeud, ritual
ChiefdomHereditary centreTribute, mana
StateSpecialistsLaw and army

Concepts

Power, law, control

  • Long-distance trade theories (Wright & Johnson): bureaucracy to protect caravans.
  • Lukes’s three faces; Foucault’s discipline and panoptic self-policing — use lightly in a 10-marker.
  • Simple-society control: kinship, shame, outcasting (Maasai teaching), restoration more than prison.
  • Evans-Pritchard: state vs stateless on power, leadership, law, force, territory, history.
  • Maine: status to contract as a modern-law story — too neat for caste India, still a quote.

WRAP Exams coaching notes for UPSC Anthropology optional. Pair with the official syllabus when you need every heading in order.

PDF