Given below are two statements one is labelled asAssertion (A) :and the other as Reason (R).Assertion (A):The territories of the Sultanate could be broadly divided into two parts the Khalsa and the Jagirs.Reason (R):The Jagirs comprised of the land under the control of the State.

1. A

   Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

   Both true, R not explaining A. R is false: Khalsa is state land; jagirs are assignments to nobles.

2. B

   (A) is false, but (R) is true

   (A) false. The Khalsa–jagir split is standard Sultanate fiscal geography.

3. C

   (A) is true, but (R) is false

   (A) true, (R) false. Territories: Khalsa (crown) and jagirs. Jagirs were not ‘land under State control’ in the Khalsa sense — that is Khalsa.

4. D

   Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

   Both true and R explains A. R reverses Khalsa and jagir.

Summary. Official key is (c). Khalsa vs jagir holds. Jagirs were not the State’s own khalsa land.