Correct answer: (d) Both 1 and 2
Explanation
- A
Only 2
Option (a) claims that only statement 2 is correct while statement 1 is incorrect. However, this is not the key because both statements given in the question regarding the MATES framework are factually accurate.
- B
Neither 1 nor 2
Option (b) claims that neither statement 1 nor statement 2 is correct. This is incorrect because both statements correctly describe the features and bilateral nature of the Mobility Arrangement for Talented Early-professionals Scheme.
- C
Only 1
Option (c) claims that only statement 1 is correct while statement 2 is incorrect. This is not the key because the scheme indeed offers eligible young Indian graduates aged 18 to 30 the opportunity to live and work in Australia for up to two years.
- D
Both 1 and 2
Option (d) states that both statement 1 and statement 2 are correct, which is the official key because the Mobility Arrangement for Talented Early-professionals Scheme is indeed a bilateral framework established between India and Australia to facilitate the mobility of young professionals, specifically allowing Indian graduates aged 18 to 30 with skills in designated fields of study to live and work in Australia for a duration of up to two years.
Summary. Official key is (d) as both statements regarding the Mobility Arrangement for Talented Early-professionals Scheme are correct. Statement 1 accurately identifies it as a bilateral framework between India and Australia. Statement 2 correctly highlights that Indian graduates aged 18 to 30 with specific skills can live and work in Australia for up to two years. Aspirants must carefully verify age brackets and bilateral partners in international agreements. Thus, option (d) is the correct choice.