Correct answer: (c) Only 1
Explanation
- A
Only 2
Option (a) claims that only statement 2 is correct. This is incorrect because Lord Dalhousie implemented the Doctrine of Lapse and refused to recognize the adopted son of Rani Lakshmi Bai, making statement 2 factually false.
- B
Neither 1 nor 2
Option (b) claims that neither statement 1 nor 2 is correct. This is incorrect because statement 1 accurately describes Kunwar Singh leading the 1857 revolt in Jagdishpur, Bihar.
- C
Only 1
Option (c) claims that only statement 1 is correct. Statement 1 is indeed correct as Kunwar Singh was the prominent landlord of Jagdishpur who fiercely led the rebellion against the British forces in Bihar during the 1857 uprising. Statement 2 is incorrect because Lord Dalhousie rejected the adopted son of Rani Lakshmi Bai under the Doctrine of Lapse, which eventually led to her joining the revolt in Jhansi.
- D
Both 1 and 2
Option (d) claims that both statement 1 and statement 2 are correct. This is incorrect because statement 2 is false as Lord Dalhousie denied recognition to the adopted heir of Jhansi.
Summary. Official key is (c) because only the first statement regarding Kunwar Singh is historically accurate. Statement 1 correctly identifies Kunwar Singh as the leader of the 1857 revolt in Jagdishpur, Bihar. Statement 2 is incorrect because Lord Dalhousie rejected the succession of Rani Lakshmi Bai's adopted son under the Doctrine of Lapse. Therefore, options claiming statement 2 is correct are invalid. Only option (c) correctly isolates the valid statement.