Correct answer: (a) Only 1
Explanation
- A
Only 1
Option (a) states that only statement 1 is correct. This is the official key because El-Nino indeed involves the periodic appearance of warm ocean currents off the coast of Peru in the Eastern Pacific, disrupting the normal cold Humboldt Current. Statement 2 is incorrect because while the warm water does raise coastal temperatures, it drastically reduces (rather than increases) the quantity of plankton and fish populations in the region due to nutrient depletion.
- B
Only 2
Option (b) claims that only statement 2 is correct. This is incorrect because the second statement contains a factual error regarding plankton quantity, which actually decreases during El-Nino events. Therefore, selecting only statement 2 misses the accurate description of the warm current phenomenon provided in the first statement.
- C
Both 1 and 2
Option (c) asserts that both statements 1 and 2 are correct. This is incorrect because statement 2 is factually flawed regarding the increase of plankton in the sea. Consequently, combining both statements makes this option invalid.
- D
Neither 1 nor 2
Option (d) states that neither statement 1 nor 2 is correct. This is incorrect because the first statement accurately describes the appearance of warm currents along the Peruvian coast during an El-Nino phase.
Summary. Official key is (a) with respect to the characteristics of El-Nino. El-Nino is marked by the anomalous warming of surface waters in the Eastern Pacific Ocean along the coast of Peru. Statement 1 correctly identifies this primary mechanism of warm current appearance. Statement 2 is wrong because the influx of warm, nutrient-poor water suppresses upwelling, leading to a decrease rather than an increase in plankton and fish. Thus, only the first statement holds true.