Correct answer: (b) Both 1 and 2
Explanation
- A
Neither 1 nor 2
Option (a) claims that neither statement 1 nor statement 2 is correct regarding Chandragupta-II. This is incorrect because historical numismatic evidence strongly supports both his Shaka victory and the specific weight of his silver coinage.
- B
Both 1 and 2
Option (b) claims that both statement 1 and statement 2 are correct. Statement 1 is accurate because the issuance of silver coins by Chandragupta-II is widely recognized by historians as the definitive numismatic proof of his decisive victory over the Western Satraps (Shakas). Statement 2 is also correct as these well-crafted silver coins typically weighed around 33 grains, closely mirroring the weight standard of the conquered Shaka coinage, which facilitated smooth economic transition and commercial integration within the expanding Gupta Empire.
- C
Only 2
Option (c) claims that only statement 2 is correct while ignoring the first. This is incorrect because the assertion regarding Shaka victory substantiated by silver coins is equally vital and historically validated.
- D
Only 1
Option (d) claims that only statement 1 is correct while dismissing the second. This is incorrect because the coin weight of approximately 33 grains is an established numismatic fact verified through various archaeological discoveries.
Summary. Official key is (b) because both statements regarding Chandragupta-II and his Western Satrap campaigns are historically accurate. Statement 1 correctly identifies his silver coins as the most robust evidence of the Shaka victory. Statement 2 accurately describes the standard weight of these silver issues at about 33 grains. Eliminating the incorrect partial options leads directly to this comprehensive conclusion.