Q104 · UPPSC Prelims 2019 · Set A · General Studies

← Q103 Q105 →

Given below are two statements, one is labelled asAssertion (A) :and the other as Reason (R).Assertion (A):The Supreme Court of India has exclusive jurisdiction regarding the constitutional validity of Central laws.Reason (R):The Supreme Court is the Guardian of the Indian Constitution.Select the correct answer from the codes given below:

A Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
B Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
C (A) is true, but (R) is false
D (A) is false, but (R) is true

Correct answer: (a) Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

Explanation

  1. A

    Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

    (a) Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A). The stored key treats exclusive Supreme Court jurisdiction over the constitutional validity of Central laws as true, and the Court’s role as guardian of the Constitution as the reason that jurisdiction exists. (a) Official key.

  2. B

    Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

    (b) Both true but (R) does not explain (A). The keyed reading is that guardianship is precisely why Central statutes are finally tested at the apex court, so (R) is not a side-note.

  3. C

    (A) is true, but (R) is false

    (c) (A) true, (R) false. Guardianship of the Constitution is a standard description of the Supreme Court; (R) is not treated as false on this key.

  4. D

    (A) is false, but (R) is true

    (d) (A) false, (R) true. That would deny exclusive Central-law jurisdiction. The stored letter keeps (A) true and tied to (R).

Summary. Official key is (a). Assertion and Reason are both taken as true, and the Supreme Court as guardian of the Constitution is the explanation offered for exclusive say on the constitutional validity of Central laws.

Same topic · past papers

UPPSC has asked this before

These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.

  1. 2023 · Q11 · UPPGS

    Consider the following statements concerning the powers of the Supreme Court to issue certain writs to stop violation of Fundamental Rights: (1) The Supreme Court has power to issue writs like Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Quo Warranto and Certiorari which are appropriate for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. (2) Parliament may by law empower any other court to exercise, within its jurisdiction, the powers given to the Supreme Court. Which of the above statement(s) is/are correct? Select the correct answer from the code given below:

    View answer →

PDF