Revision summary
Organised crime in UP is gangs, mining-land mafia, narcotics, and cyber fraud; terror is modules plus border and crowd risk. The 1986 Gangsters Act, Goonda Act, and NSA are core State laws; UAPA/NIA for terror. ATS and STF are the specialised police arrangements. Nepal-border districts and tirtha cities need SSB and crowd-IED design. Trials and property attachment decide whether the stack is real.
Model answer
Introduction
Uttar Pradesh faces organised crime as gangster–mafia networks, illicit mining and land, narcotics, and cyber fraud, and terrorism as radical modules plus a long Nepal-border and pilgrimage-crowd exposure. Arrangements are law, specialised police, federal coordination, and border-crowd management—not a single slogan unit.
Body
Legal arrangements
- The Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, is the State’s signature statute against organised gangs, used with the Goonda Act and National Security Act where the facts fit.
- Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act cases, where terrorism is alleged, sit with the ATS and often with the NIA when the Centre notifies.
- Arms, NDPS, IT Act cyber provisions, and money-laundering referrals complete the toolkit; courts and special courts must actually try, not only arrest.
Police and intelligence architecture
- The Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) handles terror modules, bomb cases, and radicalisation leads; the Special Task Force (STF) has been the State’s hunter of organised gangs and inter-district criminals.
- District intelligence, range IG offices, and Lucknow’s intelligence wing feed both; CCTNS and cyber crime police stations target fraud syndicates that now out-earn old kidnapping gangs.
- Prison intelligence and inter-state teams matter because UP gangs historically used Bihar, Delhi-NCR, and Nepal corridors.
Border, pilgrimage, and federal join-up
- Nepal-facing districts (Maharajganj, Siddharthnagar, Bahraich, Shravasti and others) need SSB and State police coordination against infiltration, fake currency, and cattle-narcotic trails.
- Varanasi, Prayagraj, Ayodhya, and the Buddhist circuit require crowd and IED-aware arrangements on festival calendars; that is counter-terror as civic design.
- NIA, IB, and neighbouring State STF/ATS meetings are the federal layer; UP cannot treat terror as only a local dacoity file.
Against organised crime in the economy
- Action on illegal mining, land grabbing, and liquor-drug maps is part of the same security story, because those markets finance gangs.
- Witness protection, fast-track trial, and attachment of gang property under the Gangsters Act are the arrangements that decide whether a charge-sheet is theatre.
Explain, with limits
- Arrangements exist; impunity returns if papers leak, if cases collapse, or if politics shields a local don.
- Cite statutes and units, not invented 2024 crore outlays or unnamed “zero crime” claims.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD L[Gangsters Act UAPA NSA] --> P[ATS STF cyber] P --> B[Nepal border SSB] P --> T[NIA pilgrimage cities] A[Asset trial] --> P
Conclusion
UP counters organised crime and terror with the Gangsters Act, ATS and STF, cyber and prison intelligence, Nepal-border coordination, and NIA join-up around pilgrimage cities. The arrangement is a stack of law and units. It works only if trials and asset attachment follow the raid.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Examine the challenges of food security in Uttar Pradesh.
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q19). View answer →
-
Is the Gangsters Act a terror law?
It targets organised crime. Terror modules typically move on UAPA and NIA, with ATS first response.
-
Should the answer quote a 2024 police budget in crore?
No, unless an official figure is in hand. Name units and statutes.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q18 · UPGS5 · 12 marks
Elucidate the relationship between organized crime and terrorism and examine its impact on security of Uttar Pradesh. -
2024 · Q19 · UPGS5 · 12 marks
Examine the challenges of food security in Uttar Pradesh. -
2023 · Q5 · UPGS5 · 8 marks
Explain the security challenges in the border areas of Uttar Pradesh. -
2023 · Q11 · UPGS5 · 12 marks
Discuss the various stages of land reforms in Uttar Pradesh. How were landless agricultural labourers benefited from the land reforms?
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2024 · UPGS5 · 8 marks
Describe the cultural significance of 'Prayagraj' in ancient India.
UP history, civilisation and culture
Ancient Prayaga is the Ganga–Yamuna sangam in today’s Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh. Puranic mahatmya and the Mahabharata make it a moksha tirtha with the Akshayavat. Kaushambi and the Ashokan pillar tie the belt to Magadha and Vatsa power. Xuanzang records Harsha’s gift-assemblies at the confluence. The site is a shared sacred and royal landscape, not only a later city name.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2024 · UPGS5 · 8 marks
Write about the major republics located in Uttar Pradesh and their political system in the 6th century B.C.
Political system of UP
Sixth-century UP had ganas and kingdoms on the same Ganga–tarai map. Shakyas of Piprahwa–Kapilavastu and Mallas of Kushinagar are the main republics on UP soil. Koliyas and Moriyas were smaller neighbour sanghas. The system was a kshatriya parishad with a ganamukhya, debate, and limited voting. Kashi, Kosala, and Vatsa were monarchies and must be kept apart.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2024 · UPGS5 · 8 marks
What was the policy of the British Government towards the Taluqdars of Awadh after the Revolt of 1857?
UP in the freedom struggle
Annexation in 1856 and the summary settlement had pushed Awadh taluqdars into 1857. After the revolt Britain restored them with sanads as estate proprietors. The Oudh Estates Act, 1869, hardened landlord title and succession. Taluqdars became the rural allies of Crown rule around Lucknow. Peasants lost the occupancy tilt of the pre-revolt settlement.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.