Revision summary
Tolerance is active equal protection of difference, not indifference to harm. Compassion sees the weaker person’s cost and redesigns the desk, as Antyodaya and citizen-centricity. Neither is a licence: crime is not tolerated, and kin-tears are not public compassion. The strong can buy delay; the weak meet only the state’s face. Recognition of public service is that face remaining equal and kind under law.
Model answer
Introduction
Public service is recognised, the statement says, by how it treats those with the least voice. Tolerance and compassion are not ornaments on a Republic Day tableau; they are the values that keep a powerful desk from becoming a weapon against the weak.
Body
Tolerance in this context
- Tolerance is the disciplined refusal to punish difference of faith, language, caste, dress, or dissent when the other is already weaker at the counter.
- In public service it is Article 14 and 15 lived as a file: the same timeline for the minority mohalla, the same hearing for the opposition worker, the same ration for the disliked caste.
- It is not indifference. Indifference lets a riot rumour or a hostile clerk do the harm; tolerance is active equal protection, including of unpopular speech within the law.
- Voltaire’s ‘I disagree but will defend your right’ becomes, on a PCS desk, a speaking order that does not humiliate a petitioner for being poor, rural, or ‘from that community’.
- Limit: tolerance is not a licence for a crime or for hate that silences the weaker further; the weak person’s dignity is the test, not the strong person’s offence.
Compassion in this context
- Compassion is the will to see the weaker person’s cost — a lost wage at the window, a night without a bed in a disaster camp, a disabled applicant who cannot climb the stairs — and to redesign the desk around that cost.
- It is karuna and the Buddhist metta of public life, and Nussbaum’s political emotion that can be trained; it is also Antyodaya: the last person as the measure of a scheme.
- In administration it appears as a helpdesk that does not shout, a camp on a holiday, a reasoned exemption where the rule’s letter would crush, and a grievance that is closed with a remedy, not a number.
- Second ARC’s citizen-centricity is compassion made inspectable: a citizen charter, a deadline, and an apology when the state fails.
- Limit: compassion without law is favour; a tear for one kin and a stone for the rest is not public compassion. It must remain equal, recorded, and appealable.
Why public service is recognised by these
- The strong can buy a lawyer and a delay; the weaker section meets only the state’s face. Tolerance stops that face from being a communal or caste weapon; compassion stops it from being a closed window.
- Together they produce trust, which is the only capital a poor citizen can spend at a government office.
- Case-ready: a flood list that includes the hamlet across the track, and a clerk who sits to write for the illiterate, are these two values in one morning.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD T[Tolerance as equal protection] --> P[Public service] C[Compassion as last-person test] --> P P --> R[Trust at the counter] L[Law not favour] --> P
Conclusion
Tolerance in public service is equal protection of difference when the other is weak. Compassion is the trained will to cut the weaker person’s cost without turning the chair into a private charity. Public service is recognised by these because the weak have no other face of the state.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the functions of attitude.
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Is tolerance the same as agreeing with every belief?
No. Tolerance protects the person and lawful difference. It does not require the officer to share the belief or to permit a crime.
-
Can compassion justify bending the rule for one poor applicant?
Equity and recorded exemption where the rule would crush, yes. A secret bend for one face is favour. Put the reason on file so the next poor applicant can claim it too.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q1 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
Discuss the role of family, society and educational institutions in inculcating values. -
2019 · Q2 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
What is the process of strengthening the moral values? Whether strengthening of moral values helps in character-building? Discuss. -
2019 · Q8 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
Examine the relevance of the following in the context of civil services: (A) Transparency (B) Accountability (C) Courage of conviction -
2019 · Q12 · UPGS4 · 12 marks
Examine the role of social and political ideas of Karl Marx in the field of contemporary public services. -
2019 · Q17 · UPGS4 · 12 marks
Is there any role of empathy in public services? Explain your views with a suitable example. -
2018 · Q1 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
What are the values? Throw light over their central elements. -
2018 · Q5 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
Evaluate the relevance of the following in the context of Civil Service: (a) Conscience (b) Spirit of service (c) Discipline -
2018 · Q18 · UPGS4 · 12 marks
Discuss and evaluate the relevance of the following in the context of the civil service: (a) Integrity (b) Impartiality (c) Objectivity (d) Non-partisanship
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
What are the values? Throw light over their central elements.
Civil Service aptitude and values
A value is a stable criterion of the worthy, not a passing mood or an unexamined habit. It differs from need and from law, though it must live with both. Central elements are stability, preferential ranking, cognition joined to affect, and a force that issues in conduct. Values are socially taught yet open to public reason, and they sit in a hierarchy when goods clash. A wall motto that never meets a file is not yet a value.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
Define the ethical concerns in Government and Private Institutions.
Ethics and Human Interface
Government ethics is fiduciary: tax and force are not a private purse. Concerns are equality, neutrality, open files, conflict of interest, and the weakest user’s dignity. Private ethics is profit that must still justify wage, product, effluent, and books. Concerns are misselling, labour chains, capture, and data power. Both can lie; only the state owes the Constitution first.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
What is the philosophical basis of probity in the governance? Discuss critically.
Probity in Governance
Probity is inspectable upright dealing, not a private glow. Its basis is trust (Locke, Gandhi), Kantian respect, Aristotelian and dharmic habit, Weberian impersonality, and Ambedkar’s constitutional morality. Critique: sermons fail without CVC, PCA, and a trail; rigor without equity can crush; virtue can be theatre; utility can excuse a bribe; dharma can become caste. The officer’s test is a speaking file under cost.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.