Revision summary
NFSA 2013 makes subsidised grain a legal right for up to three-fourths of rural and half of urban people. Priority cards get 5 kg per person per month; Antyodaya households get 35 kg per month, plus ICDS, mid-day meals, and maternity benefit. Grievance officers, a State Food Commission, and a food security allowance back the right. Reforms must cut leakage without dropping genuine names, and let migrants lift grain away from home. Cereal shops alone do not end malnutrition; pulses, fortification, storage, and real audits strengthen the Act.
Model answer
Introduction
The National Food Security Act, 2013 turned a welfare grain scheme into a legal entitlement for a large majority of Indians. Food security here is not only a sack of rice; it is affordable cereals for priority households plus nutrition for children and pregnant women. The Act’s provisions set the floor. Reforms are needed because leakage, exclusion errors, and a cereal-heavy basket still leave many kitchens insecure.
Body
Provisions of NFSA, 2013
- Coverage is up to 75 percent of the rural population and 50 percent of the urban population, identified by State-notified priority households under the Targeted Public Distribution System.
- Priority households are entitled to 5 kilograms of foodgrain per person per month at the Act’s issue prices; Antyodaya Anna Yojana households keep a household allocation of 35 kilograms per month.
- The Act extends nutritional support through the Integrated Child Development Services, mid-day meals, and a maternity benefit for pregnant and lactating women, so food security is not only adult ration cards.
- Beneficiaries have a right to a food security allowance if grain is not supplied, and to grievance redressal through district and State officers plus a State Food Commission.
- Transparency tools include social audit, vigilance committees, and display of lists; women are to be treated as heads of household on ration cards where possible.
- The Centre–State split remains: the Union allocates grain and funds, States identify beneficiaries and run FPS shops, which is why implementation quality differs across Uttar Pradesh and other States.
Reforms needed to strengthen food security
- Leakage reform: end-to-end computerisation, electronic point-of-sale, and Aadhaar-based authentication reduce ghost cards, but they must not lock out genuine old or migrant households without a fallback.
- Portability: a migrant worker should lift grain outside the home district; one-nation portability was still maturing around this paper’s year and remains essential for UP’s out-migration.
- Inclusion and exclusion: socio-economic caste census and local verification need periodic revision so the poor are not left off the list while the better-off stay on it.
- Diet quality: a cereal-only PDS does not end malnutrition; pulses, edible oil, fortification, and ICDS/MDM quality close the nutrition gap the Act already names.
- Supply-side: timely procurement, storage against rot, and MSP-backed diversification so the Act is not only a wheat-rice tunnel.
- Governance: independent State Food Commissions, real social audits, and timely food security allowance payments make the legal right justiciable rather than a pamphlet.
NFSA is a rights law. Strengthening it is a delivery and diet reform, not a new slogan on the same leaky shop.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD A[NFSA 2013 right] --> P[Priority 5 kg AAY 35 kg] A --> N[ICDS MDM maternity] T[TPDS FPS] --> P R[ePoS portability audit] --> L[Less leakage] D[Pulses oil fortify] --> Q[Nutrition not only cereal]
Conclusion
NFSA 2013 legalises TPDS grain for a majority of rural and a large share of urban India, plus ICDS, mid-day meals, and maternity support, with grievance and allowance backstops. Strengthening food security needs leakage control without exclusion, migrant portability, a wider food basket, better storage, and commissions that actually hear complaints.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
“Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) are the drivers of economic growth and employment proliferation in India.” Examine this statement.
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q14). View answer →
-
Does NFSA cover only rice and wheat for adults?
The PDS entitlement is grain, but the Act also names ICDS, mid-day meals, and maternity support as nutritional rights.
-
Is Aadhaar at the shop enough to fix food security?
It can cut ghosts, but without a fallback it can exclude the genuine poor. Portability, diet, and storage still need reform.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q15 · UPGS3 · 12 marks
"Land reforms in India remain an unfinished agenda." Explain how the lack of proper land records and tenancy reforms act as hurdles in the industrialization and modernisation of agriculture in India. -
2024 · Q3 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
Was the 'Bhoodan Movement' a part of land reforms in India? Discuss its major effects. -
2023 · Q3 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
What are the important challenges faced in the implementation of land reforms in India? Give your suggestions to remove these challenges. -
2021 · Q13 · UPGS3 · 12 marks
Do you agree with the statement that success of ‘Make in India’ programme depends on the success of ‘Skill India’ Programme and radical labour reforms? Discuss with logical arguments.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
Evaluate the effects of globalization on industrial development in India.
Economic planning and NITI Aayog
1991 reforms and WTO entry opened Indian industry to trade, capital, and technology. Autos, pharma, telecom, and organised engineering gained FDI, quality, and exports. MSMEs in labour-intensive lines faced cheap imports and informal labour. Factory growth clustered in a few belts; manufacturing’s GDP share stayed modest. The effect is mixed capability, not uniform industrialisation.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
Describe the targets of energy generation through renewable energy sources in accordance with National Energy Policy 2017 drafted by NITI Aayog.
Economic planning and NITI Aayog
NITI Aayog’s 2017 draft NEP folds existing RE and climate pledges into one energy frame. 175 GW by 2022: 100 GW solar, 60 GW wind, 10 GW bio-power, 5 GW small hydro. About 40 per cent non-fossil electricity capacity by 2030 is the Paris-linked target. 24×7 power for all and village electrification are the access companions. Corridors, bidding, and must-run status turn capacity targets into generation.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
Throw light on the ‘Pursuit of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in India’.
Economic planning and NITI Aayog
SDGs are seventeen 2030 UN goals; India maps them onto existing Union and State schemes. NITI Aayog coordinates and publishes the SDG India Index; MoSPI builds indicators. Poverty, health, education, water, energy, and climate goals ride on named flagships. Large inter-State gaps remain on nutrition, learning, and air. Pursuit is federal delivery, not a separate UN ministry.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.