Revision summary
One Nation One Election means a common calendar for Lok Sabha and Assemblies, sometimes local bodies. Prospects are lower repeated cost, fewer Model Code freezes, and less voter fatigue. Limitations are Articles 83 and 172 dissolutions, hung houses, and federal clocks that diverged after 1967. A national wave can drown State issues; that is a democratic cost. Simultaneity needs a cluster of amendments, not an Election Commission notice.
Model answer
Introduction
One Nation One Election means holding Lok Sabha and State Assembly polls together, and in some versions local bodies too, on a common calendar. The idea promises less cost and more governance time. An examination must also show the federal, constitutional, and hung-house limits that make simultaneity a hard redesign, not a simple notification.
Body
Prospects
- A common roll, a common machine, and one security deployment cut the Election Commission’s and the State’s repeated bill for five years of staggered polls.
- The Model Code of Conduct would freeze development less often, which is the governance argument ministers repeat.
- Voter fatigue and the permanent campaign could ease if the citizen votes once for Union and State in the same season.
- A High-Level Committee (Kovind, 2024) later restated these gains and sketched a two-step calendar, which shows the idea has official afterlife beyond 2022 speeches.
- National parties prefer a single wave; that political prospect is real even when it is not a constitutional virtue.
Limitations
- Articles 83 and 172 fix five-year terms but allow earlier dissolution; a hung Assembly or a lost confidence vote would still need a mid-term poll or President’s Rule, which breaks the common calendar unless a truncated House is forced.
- Federalism: States did not all begin on the same clock after 1967; imposing a Union-timed Assembly election can look like a Delhi calendar over a State mandate.
- Local issues drown in a national wave; that is a democratic cost, not only an administrative saving.
- The Constitution would need a cluster of amendments — terms, no-confidence consequences, possibly local bodies — plus a new organic law; the Election Commission cannot notify simultaneity alone.
- Logistical peak (forces, EVMs, officers) may be heavier on one day than the present spread, so “cheaper” is an average claim, not a district claim.
Examination
- Prospects are cost, MCC relief, and a quieter administrative year.
- Limitations are federal clocks, hung houses, national-wave bias, and a heavy amending bill.
- The concept is therefore attractive as a reform pamphlet and unfinished as a working Constitution.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD P[Prospects cost MCC governance] --> ONE[One Nation One Election] L[Limits federal terms hung House] --> ONE A[Constitutional amendments] --> ONE ONE --> OUT[Attractive unfinished redesign]
Conclusion
One Nation One Election offers fewer polls, lower average cost, and longer governance windows. It is limited by staggered federal terms, dissolution politics, and the risk that a national wave swallows State choice. Without a carefully designed amending package it remains a prospect, not a present electoral system.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the evolution and impact of the “Basic structure doctrine” of the Indian Constitution.
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q17). View answer →
-
Did India ever have simultaneous elections?
Yes, broadly from 1952 to 1967. Premature dissolutions then staggered the clocks.
-
Can the Election Commission order One Nation One Election today?
No. Terms, dissolution, and local-body clocks need constitutional and statutory change first.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q12 · UPGS2 · 12 marks
What are the implications of the revised appointment process of Election Commission for ensuring its independence? -
2020 · Q12 · UPGS2 · 12 marks
What are the problems faced by the Election Commission as an institution at present? Also mention solution for them. -
2020 · Q16 · UPGS2 · 12 marks
"Right to Information Act has forced civil servants to come out of steel frame and serve people sincerely." Explain. -
2019 · Q8 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
Critically examine the main elements of the Representation of People’s Act. -
2018 · Q9 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
Evaluate the use of Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) in the General Election of India.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2022 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
Describe the salient features of “UMANG Scheme” related to e-governance.
Welfare schemes
UMANG is a unified mobile and web app for new-age governance, launched in November 2017 by MeitY and NeGD. One login reaches many central and state services instead of separate department apps. Aadhaar, DigiLocker, and payments sit on the same rail. The catalogue is multilingual and searchable. The platform works only where departments keep their modules live.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2022 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
What are the fundamental causes of poverty and hunger? What government schemes have been implemented to eliminate poverty and hunger?
Welfare schemes
Poverty and hunger rest on insecure earnings, unequal land and social access, and weak health and education. Climate and delivery leaks turn a shock into chronic hunger. NFSA 2013 and PMGKAY supply a cereal floor; MGNREGA supplies rural wages. NRLM, PMAY-G, PM POSHAN, POSHAN Abhiyaan, and ICDS attack livelihood, housing, and nutrition. Cereal rations do not by themselves end micronutrient hunger.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2022 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
Discuss the role of non-governmental organisations in the process of policy making.
Indian Constitution
NGOs shape policy by turning field failure into campaigns that later become law. They supply notes, model bills, and pilots that ministries and committees use. NITI Aayog, social audit, standing committees, media, and PIL are the usual doors. FCRA and donor templates can help or distort Indian federal design. NGOs advise and watch; they do not enact statutes.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.