Revision summary
The Ottawa Declaration 1996 created the Arctic Council of eight circumpolar States. Indigenous Permanent Participants have a structural voice rare in global forums. Six working groups generate the environmental and development science. Chairmanship rotates; decisions are consensus, not majority. Military security is outside the mandate. Observers such as India (2013) may contribute but not vote.
Model answer
Introduction
The Arctic Council is the leading intergovernmental forum for the Arctic’s environment and sustainable development. It is not a military alliance and not a UN organ. A short note must show who sits at the table, how consensus works, and why observers such as India remain outside the vote.
Body
Structure
- The Council was created by the Ottawa Declaration of 19 September 1996 among the eight Arctic States: Canada, the Kingdom of Denmark (for Greenland), Finland, Iceland, Norway, the Russian Federation, Sweden, and the United States.
- Those eight are the members; chairmanship rotates every two years among them.
- Six organisations of Arctic Indigenous peoples are Permanent Participants—for example the Inuit Circumpolar Council and the Saami Council—with full consultation rights, which is the Council’s distinctive feature.
- Six working groups carry the scientific load: AMAP (pollution), CAFF (biodiversity), EPPR (emergencies), PAME (marine environment), SDWG (sustainable development), and ACAP (contaminants action).
- A small standing Secretariat in Tromsø supports the chair; Senior Arctic Officials steer between ministerial meetings.
- Observers include several non-Arctic States (India was admitted in 2013), the EU in a de facto watcher’s seat at times, and some NGOs; observers may propose and fund projects but do not vote.
Functioning
- Decisions are by consensus of the eight members, after consultation with Permanent Participants; there is no weighted vote and no Arctic parliament.
- Ministerial meetings every two years issue declarations; the working groups produce assessments on climate, black carbon, shipping, and biodiversity that feed those texts.
- The Council explicitly excludes military security; search-and-rescue and oil-spill instruments were negotiated alongside, not as a NATO clone.
- Functioning depends on science diplomacy and on Russia–West cooperation in the High North; after 2022 that cooperation paused in many working tracks, which showed the forum’s political fragility.
- For India the observer role is access to climate science, shipping routes, and research stations’ legitimacy, not a seat on the members’ dais.
Note of limit
- The Council cannot bind non-members on UNCLOS or on continental-shelf claims; it is a forum plus working groups, not an Arctic government.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD M[8 Arctic States] --> D[Consensus decisions] PP[Permanent Participants] --> D WG[Six working groups] --> D O[Observers including India] --> WG
Conclusion
The Arctic Council’s structure is eight States, Indigenous Permanent Participants, six working groups, and a rotating chair. It functions by consensus on environment and development, with observers on the margin. That design makes it unique and also vulnerable when great-power politics freeze the working groups.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Evaluate the reasons of India’s ‘Soft Power’ diplomacy in Afghanistan.
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q19). View answer →
-
Is the Arctic Council a treaty organisation like NATO?
No. It is a consensus forum from a declaration. It does not run a mutual-defence clause.
-
Can India become a member?
Membership is limited to the eight Arctic States. Non-Arctic countries can only be observers.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q1 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
What role do Joint Parliamentary Committees (JPCs) play in the Indian legislative process? How do they contribute to effective law-making? Analyse. -
2025 · Q11 · UPGS2 · 12 marks
"India's Constituent Assembly was the legal outcome of Parliamentary developments during the Colonial period." Critically examine this statement. -
2024 · Q11 · UPGS2 · 12 marks
Analyze the statement, "State legislatures are often seen as the voice of the states within India's federal structure." -
2022 · Q14 · UPGS2 · 12 marks
Are the committees considered to be useful for Parliamentary work? Discuss, in this context, the role of the Estimates Committee. -
2021 · Q7 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
Describe the role played by Parliamentary Committees in the functioning of Indian Parliament. -
2021 · Q15 · UPGS2 · 12 marks
Discuss the main methods by which the Parliament of India controls the executive.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2021 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
Discuss the role of Non-Government Organizations in the process of policy formulation.
Government policies for development
NGOs bring neglected social and environmental facts into the policy agenda. They feed research, model drafts, and working-group notes into design. Last-mile delivery and social audits return implementation failure to ministries. Litigation can force the state to rewrite guidelines. They cannot legislate; FCRA and capture remain limits on their role.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2021 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
‘Citizen charter in India could not become effective. There is a need to make it effective and meaningful’ – Evaluate.
Indian Constitution
A citizen charter publishes service standards, timelines, and grievance routes. Most Indian charters stayed ineffective because they lacked staff, publicity, and penalty. Overlap with RTI and guarantee Acts reduced the charter to a poster. Statutory time limits, Sevottam-type quality, and compensation can make it meaningful. The evaluation agrees that reform must add sanction, not only a new document.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2021 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
How are the issues related to hunger and poverty in India impinging upon electoral politics?
Policies of other countries
Parties treat food, work, and pensions as core manifesto goods for poor voters. Food and fuel inflation turns hunger into an anti-incumbency charge. Poverty geography influences tickets and caste–class coalitions. Ration and job delivery is sold as proof of a caring government. Identity and leadership still share the verdict; hunger is a major, not sole, driver.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.