Revision summary
Poverty rupees and hunger calories are related measures, not identical lives. Multidimensional poverty and NFHS stunting-anaemia data catch what a line misses. PDS and NFSA help calories; protein, micronutrients, and women’s diets still lag. Leakage, authentication exclusion, and informal work recreate hunger amid growth. Caste, gender, region, and climate are structural issues, not residual statistics.
Model answer
Introduction
- Poverty and hunger are related but not the same: a household can sit above a rupee line and still eat a cereal-heavy, micronutrient-poor diet. The main issues are how we count the poor, why calories do not equal nutrition, how public delivery leaks, and how caste, gender, region, and climate keep both wounds open.
Body
Measurement and definition
- Official poverty lines (Tendulkar, later Rangarajan debates) clash with multidimensional poverty that counts health, schooling, and assets, not only consumption rupees.
- Hunger is tracked through calorie intake, the Global Hunger Index controversy, NFHS anthropometry (stunting, wasting, anaemia), and Food Insecurity Experience Scales—each can tell a different political story.
- Hidden hunger—vitamin and mineral deficiency—can coexist with overflowing grain godowns.
Nutrition versus foodgrain
- The National Food Security Act and PDS have improved calorie access in many States, yet protein, fat, and micronutrient poverty persist, especially for women and children.
- Infant and maternal undernutrition lock in lifetime disadvantage; mid-day meals and ICDS fail where kitchens, eggs, and last-mile staff fail.
- Obesity and undernutrition now sit in the same poor neighbourhoods as a double burden of malnutrition.
Delivery, markets, and work
- Leakage, exclusion from ration lists, Aadhaar and authentication failures, and inter-State migrant invisibility turn legal entitlements into queue humiliation.
- Informal, seasonal, and unpaid care work keep incomes volatile; MGNREGA delays and urban informal shocks recreate hunger even when GDP grows.
- Farm distress, price crashes, and climate droughts or floods hit net-food-buying poor households twice: lost wages and dearer food.
Structure and dignity
- Caste and tribal location still predict landlessness, sanitation, and school completion, which predict poverty traps.
- Gender: intra-household allocation often leaves women eating last and least; unpaid work is missing from many poverty counts.
- Urban poverty is rent, sanitation, and job insecurity more than a rural land story; one national slogan does not fit both.
- SDG 1 and SDG 2 commit India to end poverty and hunger; the issue is whether fiscal federalism, agriculture, health, and women’s programmes actually converge on the same household.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD P[Poverty lines and MPI] --> H[Hunger and hidden hunger] N[NFSA PDS ICDS MDM] --> H L[Leakage exclusion informal work] --> H C[Caste gender climate] --> P C[C] --> H[H]
Conclusion
The main issues of poverty and hunger are measurement fights, the calorie–nutrition gap, leaky and exclusionary delivery, and structural caste-gender-climate traps. Grain stocks and a poverty-line victory are not enough if stunting, anaemia, and precarious work remain the lived diet of the poor.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Clarify e-governance. Explain the features and advantages of e-governance. What are the main challenges before it?
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q16). View answer →
-
If FCI godowns are full, is hunger over?
No. Stocks measure procurement, not whether a woman in a hamlet eats iron-rich food or whether a migrant can draw ration in another State.
-
Is poverty only a rural farm problem?
No. Urban informal rents, sanitation, and job shocks produce hunger too. Measurement that sees only villages will miss the city poor.
Same topic · past papers
UPPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.
-
2021 · Q3 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
How are the issues related to hunger and poverty in India impinging upon electoral politics? -
2022 · Q1 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
Describe the salient features of “UMANG Scheme” related to e-governance.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS2 · 8 marks · Solution
Why is India opposed to mediation on Kashmir?
Indian Constitution
India treats Jammu and Kashmir as an integral Union subject after accession in 1947. Simla 1972 and later bilateral texts require peaceful settlement without a mediator. Mediation would internationalise what New Delhi now frames as an internal constitutional and security issue. Pakistan is a counterpart for talks on terror and peace, not a co-sovereign over Indian territory. India therefore rejects UN, great-power, or other good-offices formulas that write a Kashmir settlement.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS2 · 8 marks · Solution
Critically examine the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice.
India and its neighbours
The ICJ is the UN’s principal judicial organ under the Charter and the ICJ Statute. Contentious cases lie only between states and only with consent via special agreement, treaty, or optional clause. The Court rules on its own jurisdiction, as in Jadhav under the consular Optional Protocol. Advisory opinions go to authorised UN organs and are not binding judgments. Enforcement depends on states and the Security Council; individuals are not on trial at the ICJ.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS2 · 8 marks · Solution
Throw light on the challenges and problems of farmers and the agriculture sector in Uttar Pradesh. Suggest measures for improvement.
Social sector services
Uttar Pradesh leads in foodgrain output but farm incomes stay low on tiny holdings and uneven water. Eastern floods and Bundelkhand droughts sit beside western groundwater stress and cane-payment delays. Paddy–wheat lock-in and thin mandi–FPO reach keep farmers as price-takers. Remedies are last-mile irrigation, statutory cane dues, FPO and e-NAM markets, and a shift to pulses, millets, milk, and processing. Land-lease clarity and working crop insurance must travel with those measures.