Revision summary
US federalism is a coming-together compact; Indian federalism is a holding-together Union. Residuary power lies with US states and with the Indian Union. India has single citizenship and an integrated judiciary; the USA has dual citizenship and dual courts. The Senate is equal by state; Rajya Sabha is population-weighted and weaker on money bills. India’s emergency and Governor provisions have no US analogue of President’s Rule.
Model answer
Introduction
Both India and the United States are federal unions with written constitutions and judicial review, but they were built on opposite founding stories. India is a holding-together Union with a strong Centre; the USA is a coming-together federation of previously sovereign states.
Body
Origin and legal design
- The US Constitution lists federal powers and leaves the residue to the states (Tenth Amendment); the Indian Constitution lists Union, State, and Concurrent Lists and gives residuary power to the Union (Article 248 and Entry 97).
- India has a single Constitution and a single citizenship; the USA has dual citizenship and state constitutions beside the federal one.
- The Indian judiciary is integrated: High Courts and the Supreme Court form one hierarchy. The USA keeps a dual court system of state and federal benches.
Institutions and politics
- US Senators represent states equally, two each, which protects small states; Rajya Sabha seats roughly follow population, so Uttar Pradesh outweighs Goa, and money bills can bypass the Council of States.
- Indian Governors are appointed by the President; US state governors are elected. All-India Services and a unified Election Commission further nationalise Indian administration.
- Articles 352–360 let the Union suspend or override state autonomy in emergencies; the US federal government has no equivalent President’s Rule over a state legislature.
Fiscal and amendment notes
- Indian states depend more on Union transfers (Finance Commission, GST Council) than US states, which have a wider tax base of their own.
- Constitutional amendment in India can redraw states; US state boundaries are politically almost frozen.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD U[USA coming together] --> T[Tenth Amendment residue to states] I[India holding together] --> R[Article 248 residue to Union] T --> D[Dual citizenship dual courts] R --> S[Single citizenship integrated courts]
Conclusion
India differs from US federalism in residuary Union power, single citizenship, an integrated judiciary, an unequal Council of States, nominated Governors, and emergency override. Both are federal in the sense of divided lists and a Supreme Court; they are not federal in the same historical or political sense.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Describe those special powers of the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) which are not enjoyed by the Lok Sabha under the Indian Constitution.
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Is India not federal at all?
It is federal in the division of lists, dual polity, and judicial review. It is more centralised than the USA in residue, emergency, and all-India services.
-
Can the US President dismiss a state government like Article 356?
No. There is no President’s Rule analogue. Federal–state conflict is litigated, not governed by a Union takeover clause.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q19 · UPGS2 · 12 marks
What are the areas of contention and cooperation in India-USA relations? Discuss. -
2019 · Q16 · UPGS2 · 12 marks
What are the causes behind recent USA and Iran tensions? How will this tension affect the national interest of India? How should India respond to this situation? Discuss.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
Why is India opposed to mediation on Kashmir?
Indian Constitution
India treats Jammu and Kashmir as an integral Union subject after accession in 1947. Simla 1972 and later bilateral texts require peaceful settlement without a mediator. Mediation would internationalise what New Delhi now frames as an internal constitutional and security issue. Pakistan is a counterpart for talks on terror and peace, not a co-sovereign over Indian territory. India therefore rejects UN, great-power, or other good-offices formulas that write a Kashmir settlement.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
Critically examine the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice.
India and its neighbours
The ICJ is the UN’s principal judicial organ under the Charter and the ICJ Statute. Contentious cases lie only between states and only with consent via special agreement, treaty, or optional clause. The Court rules on its own jurisdiction, as in Jadhav under the consular Optional Protocol. Advisory opinions go to authorised UN organs and are not binding judgments. Enforcement depends on states and the Security Council; individuals are not on trial at the ICJ.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS2 · 8 marks
Throw light on the challenges and problems of farmers and the agriculture sector in Uttar Pradesh. Suggest measures for improvement.
Social sector services
Uttar Pradesh leads in foodgrain output but farm incomes stay low on tiny holdings and uneven water. Eastern floods and Bundelkhand droughts sit beside western groundwater stress and cane-payment delays. Paddy–wheat lock-in and thin mandi–FPO reach keep farmers as price-takers. Remedies are last-mile irrigation, statutory cane dues, FPO and e-NAM markets, and a shift to pulses, millets, milk, and processing. Land-lease clarity and working crop insurance must travel with those measures.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.