Q12 · UPPSC PCS Mains 2018 · GS I · 12 marks · ~200 words in the hall · 2 min read

← Q11 Q13 →

Discuss the role of Hitler in bringing about the Second World War.

Topic: World history. Syllabus: History of the world from the 18th century to the middle of the 20th century. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2018 and World history.

Revision summary

Nazi ideology fused race hate with eastern living space and revenge on Versailles. The 1933–34 dictatorship and rearmament made a war state. Rhineland, Anschluss, and Munich trained Hitler that democracies would yield. Prague 1939 exposed unlimited aims; the Soviet pact cleared the path to Poland. The 1 September invasion, not Munich alone, opened the European world war. Appeasement and other Axis partners were context, not substitutes for his agency.

Model answer

Introduction

The Second World War had many parents—Versailles bitterness, the Depression, Japanese and Italian aggression, and British-French appeasement. A discussion of Hitler’s role must still put the Nazi programme of race, rearmament, and Lebensraum at the centre of the European war that opened on 1 September 1939.

Body

Ideology and the capture of the German state

  • Mein Kampf and Nazi speeches named Jews, Slavs, and the Versailles order as enemies, and Lebensraum in the east as the cure for Germany’s alleged encirclement.
  • Appointment as Chancellor in January 1933, the Enabling Act, the night of the Long Knives, and the fusion of President and Führer in 1934 turned a party into a war-capable dictatorship.
  • Rearmament, conscription (1935), and the Luftwaffe broke the military clauses of Versailles and taught Europe that treaties would be tested by force.

From revision to open war

  • Remilitarisation of the Rhineland (1936) was a gamble that Paris and London did not stop; it destroyed the last buffer of 1919 and raised Hitler’s domestic prestige.
  • The Rome–Berlin Axis, intervention in Spain, Anschluss with Austria (March 1938), and the Munich dismemberment of Czechoslovakia (September 1938) showed a method: threaten, split the democracies, then occupy.
  • Occupation of Prague in March 1939 ended the pretence that Hitler wanted only German-speakers; Britain then guaranteed Poland.
  • The Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact (August 1939) freed the eastern front for a week; the invasion of Poland on 1 September, with a Soviet entry on 17 September, made a European war certain after Britain and France declared war on 3 September.

Agency without a single-cause myth

  • Appeasement at Munich, the League’s failure in Manchuria and Abyssinia, and Japan’s China war created a climate in which Hitler could move, but they did not write the Polish ultimatum.
  • Hitler’s personal timetable—autarky, Four Year Plan, and a war he believed must come while Germany was strong—turned revisionism into a general war rather than a limited border fix.
  • A fair discussion therefore gives Hitler the decisive European agency while still naming the wider breakdown of the 1919 order.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  V[Versailles grievance] --> N[Nazi state rearm]
  N --> R[Rhineland Anschluss Munich]
  R --> P[Prague then Poland 1939]
  P --> W[Britain France declare war]

Conclusion

Hitler made the European war by destroying Versailles in arms, swallowing Austria and Czech lands, and invading Poland after a Soviet pact. Appeasement and other aggressors mattered as context; the trigger and the racial-imperial programme were his.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • 'Revolt of 1857 was a turning point in Indian History.' Analyse.

    Next question in the 2018 paper (Q13). View answer →

  • Would war have come without Hitler?

    A German-Polish crisis might still have arisen from Versailles borders, but the racial-imperial timetable, Prague, and the Soviet pact were Hitler’s choices. Counterfactuals do not erase that agency.

  • Was the war only Hitler versus the West?

    No. Japan’s China war and Italy’s African adventures were parallel aggressions. The question, however, is his role in starting the European war of 1939, which then globalised.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2024 · Q3 · UPGS1 · 8 marks

    “Napoleon was the son of the Revolution.” – Explain.

    View answer →

  2. 2023 · Q13 · UPGS1 · 12 marks

    Evaluate the role of Bismarck in the unification of Germany.

    View answer →

  3. 2022 · Q12 · UPGS1 · 12 marks

    Throw light on the 'Revolutionary Philosophy' formulated by Bhagat Singh.

    View answer →

  4. 2021 · Q3 · UPGS1 · 8 marks

    “The Industrial Revolution was not only a technological revolution but also socio-economic revolution that changed the way people lived.” Comment.

    View answer →

  5. 2021 · Q13 · UPGS1 · 12 marks

    What do you understand by the Balkan Crisis? What was its role in the First World War?

    View answer →

  6. 2020 · Q13 · UPGS1 · 12 marks

    Who were the Jacobins? What was their role in the French Revolution?

    View answer →

  7. 2019 · Q3 · UPGS1 · 8 marks

    Critically examine the effects of British Industrial Revolution on India's economic life.

    View answer →

  8. 2019 · Q13 · UPGS1 · 12 marks

    Describe the efforts made for world peace after the Second World War at the global level.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS1 · 8 marks

Explain the role of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel in the integration of Princely States of India.

Post-independence consolidation

Patel and V. P. Menon ran the States Department from July 1947. The Instrument of Accession covered defence, external affairs, and communications. Most rulers were persuaded with privy purses and Rajpramukh rank; unions preceded 1950. Junagadh was settled by plebiscite; Hyderabad by Operation Polo in September 1948. Administrative merger of armies, currency, and services made accession real.

Q2 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS1 · 8 marks

Describe the role of Buddhist literature in the creation of world peace.

Indian culture

The Dhammapada and Metta Sutta teach that hatred is not ended by hatred and that goodwill is a social duty. Jatakas and kingship suttas tie peace to just rule and the removal of poverty. Ashoka’s edicts after Kalinga turn canonical ahimsa into dhamma-vijaya. The Tripitaka and Mahayana sutras travelled across Asia as a shared ethic. UN Vesak and modern engaged Buddhism reuse that literature as a peace language.

Q3 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS1 · 8 marks

Mahatma Gandhi represents the middle-path approach in Indian politics. Give logical explanation.

Freedom struggle

Gandhi stood between revolutionary violence and purely legal Council politics. Satyagraha and the Constructive Programme were that method, from Champaran to the Salt March. Trusteeship refused both laissez-faire capitalism and Bolshevik seizure. He used religious idiom without accepting communal two-nation logic or caste untouchability. The middle path has caste-and-class limits, yet it is a distinct third way, not empty centrism.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.