Why in news
- Ministry of Law and Justice mobilized 19 National Law Universities to conduct data-driven research targeting criminal case backlogs across 100 high-pendency hotspot judicial districts.
Key terms
Plea Bargaining
Pre-trial agreement where a defendant pleads guilty to a lesser charge for a lighter sentence.
Summary Trial
Speedy judicial procedure for minor offenses without full formal trial proceedings.
Infructuous Cases
Litigation that has lost practical relevance or purpose due to changing circumstances.
Case Profiling
Systematic categorisation of pending court cases based on age, offense type, and procedural status.
What is the problem?
- Over 5.8 crore legal cases remain pending across Indian courts, with the vast majority concentrated in district and subordinate courts.
- A concentration of pendency exists where just 100 judicial districts account for over 50% of all subordinate court backlogs.
Key operational elements
- Department of Justice partnered with 19 National Law Universities (NLUs) across 16 states to deploy researchers for empirical case-profiling.
- Focuses on identifying infructuous cases, improving adjournment management, expanding plea bargaining, and facilitating summary trials.
Why it matters
- Shifts judicial reform strategies from uniform national mandates to hyper-targeted, district-specific micro-interventions.
- Leverages legal academic capacity and pro bono clinical infrastructure for court management.
Mains discussion
- Targeted administrative interventions versus structural judicial vacancies in clearing backlog.
- Role of clinical legal education and NLUs in empirical legal research and court reform.
Source: PIB
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.