Q49 · UPSC Prelims 2024 · Set A · Economy

← Q48 Q50 →

With reference to the rule/rules imposed by the Reserve Bank of India while treating foreign banks, consider the following statements:1.There is no minimum capital requirement for wholly owned banking subsidiaries in India.2.For wholly owned banking subsidiaries in India, at least 50% of the board members should be Indian nationals.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A 1 only
B 2 only
C Both 1 and 2
D Neither 1 nor 2

Correct answer: (d) Neither 1 nor 2

Explanation

  1. A

    1 only

    1 only. Wholly owned subsidiaries do face a minimum capital requirement.

  2. B

    2 only

    2 only. The 50% Indian-national board rule is not the RBI WOS rule as stated.

  3. C

    Both 1 and 2

    Both. Both statements fail on this paper.

  4. D

    Neither 1 nor 2

    Neither. Minimum capital applies; board composition is not “at least 50% Indian nationals” as the statement puts it.

Summary. Official key is (d) neither. RBI requires substantial minimum capital for a wholly owned banking subsidiary. The board rule in the statement (at least 50% Indian nationals) is not accepted as a correct statement of the WOS regime on this paper. So both 1 and 2 are false.

Same topic · past papers

UPSC has asked this before

These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.

  1. 2025 · Q48 · General Studies · 2 marks

    With reference to monoclonal antibodies, often mentioned in news, consider the following statements: I. They are man-made proteins. II. They stimulate immunological function due to their ability to bind to specific antigens. III. They are used in treating viral infections like that of Nipah virus. Which of the statements given above are correct?

    View answer →

PDF