Explanation
- A
1 and 2 only
Option (a) is 1 and 2 only. Reduced or zero tillage does conserve soil moisture, but applying gypsum is a sodic-soil amendment (calcium) rather than a water-conservation practice as such. Statement 2 is not a water-saving method in the sense of the question. This option is not the key.
- B
3 only
Option (b) is 3 only. Residue mulch does help, but zero tillage also conserves water, so omitting statement 1 is incomplete. This option is therefore wrong.
- C
1 and 3 only
Reduced/zero tillage cuts evaporation and runoff; leaving crop residue as mulch shades soil and improves infiltration. Gypsum before irrigation is not listed as a water-conservation technique. Hence 1 and 3 only is the official key.
- D
1, 2 and 3
Option (d) is 1, 2 and 3. Including gypsum as a water-conservation measure is the error. This option is not the key.
Summary. Official key is (c) 1 and 3 only. Conservation agriculture saves water by less tillage and by residue cover. Gypsum is used to reclaim alkali/sodic soils and improve structure; it is not itself a method of saving irrigation water in the question’s sense. Statements 1 and 3 help; 2 does not. Only that pair is correct.
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.
-
2022 · Q22 · General Studies · 2 marks
"System of Rice Intensification" of cultivation, in which alternate wetting and drying of rice fields is practised, results in: 1. Reduced seed requirement 2. Reduced methane production 3. Reduced electricity consumption Select the correct answer using the code given below: