Correct answer: (b) Extremists' lack of faith in the capacity of the moderates to negotiate with the British Government
Explanation
- A
Introduction of communalism into Indian politics by Lord Minto
Lord Minto’s encouragement of communal electorates (1909) is a parallel colonial track. It was not the main reason the Congress split at Surat in 1907. This option is not the key.
- B
Extremists' lack of faith in the capacity of the moderates to negotiate with the British Government
At Surat (December 1907) the Extremists (Tilak, Lajpat Rai, Pal, Aurobindo) had lost faith that Moderate methods — petitions, prayers and negotiation — could extract real concessions after the Swadeshi years. Clash over the presidential election and over boycott/swadeshi as Congress creed produced the split. That Extremist distrust of Moderate capacity to negotiate with the British is the official key.
- C
Foundation of Muslim League
The All-India Muslim League was founded in 1906 at Dacca. It is background to communal politics, not the immediate cause of the Surat split inside Congress. This option is wrong.
- D
Aurobindo Ghosh's inability to be elected as the President of the Indian National Congress
Aurobindo Ghosh was a leading Extremist; the presidential tussle was about Rash Behari Ghosh versus the Extremist claim, not primarily ‘Aurobindo’s inability to be elected President’. This option is not the key.
Summary. Official key is (b) Extremists’ lack of faith in the capacity of the moderates to negotiate with the British Government. After 1905 Swadeshi, Extremists wanted Congress to endorse boycott and passive resistance; Moderates wanted to keep the movement constitutional. Surat exploded over the chair and the creed. Minto-Morley communalism, the League’s birth, and Aurobindo’s personal election are nearby facts, not the main reason given in the key.
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.