Revision summary
Demonetisation shocked cash informal markets rather than igniting lasting growth. Labour became more casual where small units lost turnover. Underemployment rose as hours and farm fallback replaced wages. Women’s petty trade and unpaid enterprise took a gendered hit. Formalization remained a slogan over an informal majority.
Model answer
Introduction
Demonetisation in 2016 did not accelerate durable economic growth. It shocked cash-heavy informal India, thickened underemployment, and hit women workers who live outside formal wage records.
Body
Growth claim
- The official hope was a formal, digital, tax-clean burst of growth. Short-run disruption of trade, small manufacture, and agriculture was the sociological fact.
- A. R. Desai’s India is still largely informal. A cash ban without a prior formal wage world cannot jump-start GDP; it can stall it.
Informalization of labour
- Most Indian workers are already informal. Demonetisation pushed some units to cut days, delay pay, or shift to even more casual hiring.
- Circular migrants lost cash-in-hand work; the village became a shock absorber, later seen again in COVID reverse flows.
Underemployment
- Not open unemployment only: fewer hours, unpaid family work, and a return to tiny farms.
- Thorner’s mazdoor waited for a wage that came in old notes.
Gender discrimination
- Women in petty trade, domestic work, and unpaid family enterprise hold cash and gold at the household edge. Liquidity shock hit their turnover first.
- Seed-and-Earth families often keep women’s accounts informal, so they had less access to new-note banks and digital wallets.
- Care loads rose when incomes fell; time poverty is gendered underemployment.
What did not happen
- A sudden leap into decent formal jobs. Formalization talk continued; informal lives absorbed the cost.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD DE[Demonetisation] --> S[Cash shock] S --> I[Informal job cut] S --> G[Women petty trade hit] I --> U[Underemployment village fallback]
Conclusion
Demonetisation did not accelerate growth in any inclusive sociological sense. It revealed and worsened informalization, underemployment, and gendered exclusion from liquidity. Growth that ignores the cash-and-care economy is a statistical hope, not a lived boom.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the implications of 'Swachha Bharat Abhiyaan'. Do you think that civil society has a role to play here ? Substantiate your answer with an example
Next question in the 2019 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Did digital payments mean growth?
Some substitution occurred. Petty vendors without smartphones still lost days.
-
Was the black-money goal sociological success?
Much cash returned to banks. Informal livelihoods paid the disruption cost.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Urban slums are sites of social exclusion - explain -
2021 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Urban settlements in India tend to replicate its rural caste-kinship imprints. Discuss the main reasons -
2020 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Elaborate the causes, consequences and other concerns of growth of urban settlements in India. -
2020 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Point out the main causes of child labour' in India. How far the State policies have succeeded in its elimination? -
2019 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elucidate the concerns of growing urban displacement dynamics in India -
2018 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Construct a sociological narrative on the increasing trend of child abuse in India. -
2017 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Do you agree that the issue of child labour raises questions about and beyond the informal sector ? Give reasons. -
2017 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine the impact of heritage tourism on urban socio-spatial patterns in India
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate Srinivas's views on religion and society among the Coorgs
Religion and Society
Srinivas studied Coorg religion as observed social structure. The okka and ancestor cult knit kin and land. Hinduism appears as graded ritual interaction, not a church of equals. Sanskritization and local dominance already organise prestige. The monograph founds his later field view of Indian society.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Illustrate the contribution of the Tebhaga Movement to the peasants struggle in India
Social Movements in Modern India
Tebhaga demanded two-thirds of the crop for the sharecropper. Kisan Sabha organisation made it a mass peasant movement in Bengal. It placed class tenancy at the heart of the freedom-era agrarian question. Women and bargadars joined harvest defence. Its unfinished legal lesson returned in Operation Barga.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Examine the changing initiatives of the land tenure system in India
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
Colonial settlements created landlord, ryot, and village-share grids. Abolition, tenancy laws and ceilings cut intermediaries unevenly. Rich peasants and reverse tenancy recast who commands surplus. Operation Barga and FRA try to title tillers and forest dwellers. Records still lag the field.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.