Revision summary
Urban work favours smaller or differently crowded households. Joint family as process often survives as extra-household kin. Gender ideology lags behind residence change. Class splits the urban family into salaried nuclear and migrant huddle. Yogendra Singh’s modernization of tradition fits better than simple nuclearisation.
Model answer
Introduction
Industrialisation and urbanisation have shrunk many co-resident households and stretched kin across mill, slum, and metro. Family as lineage and duty has changed more slowly than the roof.
Body
Household impact
- Factory and office housing favour smaller conjugal households, which A. M. Shah would count as household change.
- I. P. Desai’s jointness continues as remittance, ritual, and elder duty among split units, a modified extended family.
- Informal industrial labour may crowd kin into slum rooms, which is urbanisation without a suburban nuclear ideal.
Kinship and gender
- Karve’s regional patterns mix in the city; cross-cousin and village exogamy both meet classifieds and caste matrimony sites.
- Leela Dube’s Seed and Earth still organises who inherits the village plot while daughters work in town.
- Age at marriage and some love choice rise, beside dowry inflation.
Class split
- Salaried nuclear homes and migrant joint-like messes are both urban family structures.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD IU[Industry city] --> HH[Smaller or crowded households] IU --> EX[Extended duty remittance] SK[Seed line caste] --> EX
Conclusion
Industry and city change family mainly as household form and as women’s double shift. The Indian family as caste kinship adapts rather than becoming a Western isolate.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How is ageing becoming an emerging issue in Indian society ?
Next question in the 2016 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Did the factory create the nuclear family in India?
It encouraged conjugal residence for some. Caste marriage and natal duty continued.
-
Is the village family unchanged?
No. Remittance and missing men change the village household too.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the conceptual issues about lineage and descent in India. Give suitable illustrations , -
2018 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Illustrate the importance of 'Kanyadaan' and 'Kulavadhu' in changing institution of marriage and family. -
2018 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Western patriarchy which surrenders feminine principles is the development project in India. Do you agree with this view? Why? -
2018 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Assess the impact of ban on 'Triple Talak' on marriage and divorce among the Muslim community in India. -
2017 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Clarify the distinction between "household" and "family" and evaluate Whether joint families have completely disintegrated -
2016 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Bring out the significance of the difference between family and household. -
2015 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Broadly compare the kinship system of North and South India. -
2015 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
What is patriarchy? How does it affect the child socialization pattern in India?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Salient features of A.R. Desai's Marxist Sociology
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Desai applied Marxism to nation, agrarian structure, and the Indian state. Nationalism is read as a bourgeois project in a colonial economy. Village harmony is rejected for landlord–peasant–labour relations. The state and planning are class instruments, not neutral tools. Caste is real but not the first mover in his scheme.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Significance of Village Studies in Indian Sociology
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
Village studies established the field view against book-view Indology. Rampura and Sripuram supplied core concepts of Indian sociology. They linked caste to land, faction, and later to class and power. They shaped policy talk about rural change. Migration and gender gaps now bound their claim to represent India.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
'Isolationism' as a dominant feature of colonial tribal policy
Tribal communities in India
Colonial policy used excluded areas and inner lines as isolation. The aim mixed protection of custom with forest and frontier control. Isolation was never total; markets and missions entered. Elwin inherited protection; Ghurye attacked it as stagnation. Schedules today still carry this spatial exception.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.