Revision summary
Displacement for mines and dams has dumped costs on Adivasis and villagers while cities take the gain. Cash that arrives late cannot replace commons, skill or dignity. The drafting approach is rights-first, least displacement, consent, and livelihood as the test of success. Policy elements include SIA, payment before taking, land-for-land or royalty or equity, training, gendered titles, host-area support and independent monitoring. RFCTLARR 2013 is the floor; Scheduled Area consent and the Forest Rights Act must actually operate.
Model answer
Introduction
- The stem already names the ethic: costs on the forest and the field, benefits in the city. A better policy cannot be a thicker cheque alone. It must restore livelihood, voice and a share in the project that erased the village.
Body
Stakeholders
- Adivasi, hill and rural families who lose land, commons, graves and skills tied to a place.
- Women and children, who often lose more when cash goes to a male “head”.
- Host villages that receive the displaced.
- Project authorities, industrial users and urban consumers of power, ore and water.
- The State as trustee of Scheduled Areas, forests and public purpose.
- Future generations who inherit either a fair precedent or a pattern of internal colonialism.
Ethical issues and values
- Justice: those who pay the cost must share the benefit. The present pattern fails Rawls’s least-advantaged test and fails Gandhi’s last-person test.
- Dignity: cash that turns a farmer into a nameless migrant is not rehabilitation.
- Consent and voice, especially in Scheduled Areas under the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 and the Forest Rights Act, 2006.
- Sustainability: a mine that ends in a wasteland is a second displacement.
- Values: equity, empathy, trusteeship, non-maleficence, and constitutional special care under Articles 15, 46 and the Fifth and Sixth Schedules.
Approach to drafting
- Start from rights, not from the project’s convenience. Public purpose must be real, least-displacing, and shown in a social impact assessment.
- Treat land, forest, water and culture as a bundle. Paying for the patta and ignoring the commons is a lie.
- Prefer land-for-land and project-linked livelihood over a one-time deposit that inflation will eat.
- Make delay expensive for the acquirer, not for the family.
- Gender the policy: joint titles, separate accounts, and work for women.
- Use the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as the floor, then raise it for Adivasi and hill contexts where the 2013 Act is weaker in practice.
Main elements of the suggested policy
- Avoidance: show why this site, why not a less inhabited alternative, and why a smaller footprint cannot do.
- Free, prior and informed consent in Scheduled Areas, with gram sabha minutes that are not forged; independent observers.
- Social impact assessment with public hearing in the local language, including downstream and host-area effects.
- Compensation: multiplier on market value as in RFCTLARR, plus commons, standing trees, and a solatium; payment before taking possession, with interest that actually bites if the treasury is late.
- Rehabilitation before displacement: houses, roads, school, anganwadi, health post, and electricity in the resettlement site; no “cash and vacant plot on a rock”.
- Livelihood: land for land of comparable quality where possible; if not, a legally enforceable share in royalties or a unit of project equity; jobs with training that starts years before the blast, not a peon post for one son.
- Skills and education: residential schooling and certified trades chosen by the community, not only a contractor’s unskilled roster.
- Food security until the new livelihood is proven, using the National Food Security Act, 2013 pipeline, not a farewell ration.
- Cultural continuity: graveyards, worship sites, and forest access compatible with the Forest Rights Act, 2006.
- Host-area package so the receiving village is not a second victim.
- Independent authority for R&R with Adivasi representation, social audit, and a time-bound grievance tribunal.
- No forced eviction without the package being certified complete by that authority.
- Urban and industrial beneficiaries: a surcharge on the project to fund R&R, so costs are not only “the land loser’s problem”.
- Monitoring for a generation, not for two accounting years; return of unused land.
Options rejected
- Only higher cash: still produces migrants.
- Only jobs at the gate: machines will cut those jobs.
- Treating protest as anti-national: that is how unjust distribution defends itself.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD ACQ[Acquisition] --> AVOID[Avoid or minimise] AVOID --> CON[Consent and SIA] CON --> PAY[Pay before possession] PAY --> LIV[Land skills share in project] LIV --> MON[Independent audit for a generation]
Conclusion
A just policy prices delay, pays before taking, replaces commons and livelihood, shares project rent, and puts gram sabha consent before the blast. Cash without a life is how the unethical pattern continues. The city’s power and ore must carry the hill’s cost on the city’s bill.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Case study. Suppose you are an officer in charge of implementing a social service scheme to provide support to old and destitute women. An old and illiterate woman comes to you to avail the benefits of the scheme. However, she has no documents to show that she fulfils the eligibility criteria. But after meeting her and listening to her you feel that she certainly needs support. Your enquiries also show that she is really destitute and living in a pitiable condition. You are in a dilemma as to what to do. Putting her under the scheme without necessary documents would clearly be violation of rules. But denying her the support would be cruel and inhuman. (a) Can you think of a rational way to resolve this dilemma? (b) Give your reasons for it. 24. You are a young, aspiring.
Next question in the 2016 paper (Q13). View answer →
-
If the law already pays compensation, why is the pattern still unethical?
Because payment is often late, commons are unpriced, skills are not replaced, and project profits do not return. Legality of a cheque is not justice of a life.
-
Can every family get land for land in a crowded State?
Where comparable land is impossible, the substitute must be a durable share in project value plus real housing and skills, not a shrug and a migrant bus.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2016 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. ABC Ltd. is a large transnational company having diversified business activities with a huge shareholder base. The company is continuously expanding the generating employment. The company, in its expansion and diversification programme, decides to establish a new plant at Vikaspuri, an area which is underdeveloped. The new plant is designed to use energy efficient technology that will help the company to save production cost by 20%. The company's decision goes well with the Government policy of attracting investment to develop such underdeveloped regions. The government has also announced tax holiday for five years for the companies that invest in underdeveloped areas. However, the new plant may bring chaos for the inhabitants of Vikaspuri region, which is otherwise tranquil. The new plant may result in increased cost of living, aliens migrating to the region, disturbing the social and economic order. The company sensing the possible protest tried to educate the people of Vikaspuri region and public in general that how its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policy would help overcome the likely difficulties of the residents of Vikaspuri region. In spite of this the protests begin and some of the residents decided to approach the judiciary as their plea before the Government did not yield any result. (a) Identify the issues involved in the case. (b) What can be suggested to satisfy the company's goal and to address the residents' concern? -
2016 · Q10 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Saraswati was a successful IT professional in USA. Moved by patriotic sense of doing something for the country she returned to India. Together with some other like-minded friends, she formed an NGO to build a school for a poor rural community. The objective of the school was to provide the best quality modern education at a nominal cost. She soon discovered that she has to seek permission from a number of Government agencies. The rules and procedures were quite confusing and cumbersome. What frustrated her most were delays, callous attitude of officials and constant demand for bribes. Her experience and the experience of many others like her have deterred people from taking up social service projects. A measure of Government control over voluntary social work is necessary. But it should not be exercised in a coercive a corrupt manner. What measures can you suggest to ensure that due control is exercised but well meaning, honest NGO efforts are not thwarted? -
2016 · Q11 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. A fresh engineering graduate gets a job in a prestigious chemical industry. She likes the work. The salary is also good. However, after a few months she accidentally discovers that a highly toxic waste is being secretly discharged into a river nearby. This is causing health problems to the villagers downstream who depend on the river for their water needs. She is perturbed and mentions her concern to her colleagues who have been with the company for longer periods. They advise her to keep quite as anyone who mentions the topic is summarily dismissed. She cannot risk losing her job as she is the sole beard-winner for her family and has to support her ailing parents and siblings. At first, she thinks that if her seniors are keeping quiet, why should she stick out her neck. But her conscience pricks her to do something to save the river and the people who depend upon it. At heart she feels that the advice of silence given by her friends is not correct though she cannot give reasons for it. She thinks you are a wise person and seeks your advice. (a) What arguments can you advance to show her that keeping quiet is not morally right? (b) What course of action would you advice her to adopt and why? -
2016 · Q13 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Suppose you are an officer in charge of implementing a social service scheme to provide support to old and destitute women. An old and illiterate woman comes to you to avail the benefits of the scheme. However, she has no documents to show that she fulfils the eligibility criteria. But after meeting her and listening to her you feel that she certainly needs support. Your enquiries also show that she is really destitute and living in a pitiable condition. You are in a dilemma as to what to do. Putting her under the scheme without necessary documents would clearly be violation of rules. But denying her the support would be cruel and inhuman. (a) Can you think of a rational way to resolve this dilemma? (b) Give your reasons for it. 24. You are a young, aspiring. -
2016 · Q14 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. You are a young, aspiring and sincere employee in a Government office working as an assistant to the director of your department. Since you have joined recently, you need to lean and progress. Luckily your superior is very kind and ready to train you for your job. He is a very intelligent and well-informed person having knowledge of various departments. In short, you respect your boss and are looking forward to lean a lot from him. Since you have good tuning with the boss, he started depending on you. One day due to ill health he invited you at his place for finishing some urgent work. You reached his house and before you could ring the bell you heard shouting noises. You waited for a while. After entering the house the boss greeted you and explained the work. But you were constantly disturbed by the crying of a woman. At last, you inquired with the boss but his answer did not satisfy you. Next day, you were compelled to inquire further in the office and found out that his behavior is very bad at home with his wife. He also beats up bit wife. His wife is not well educated and is a simple woman in comparison to her husband. you see that though your boss is a nice person in the office, he is engaged in domestic violence at home. In such a situation, you are left with the following options. Analyse each option with its consequences. (a) Just ignore thinking about it because it is their personal matter. (b) Repost the case to the appropriate authority. (c) Your own innovative approach towards situation. -
2015 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. One of the scientists working in the R & D laboratory of a major pharmaceutical company discovers that one of the company's best selling veterinary drugs, B has the potential to cure a currently incurable liver disease that is prevalent in tribal areas. However, developing a variant of the drug suitable for human beings entailed a lot of research and development having a huge expenditure to the extent of f 50 crores. It was unlikely that the company would recover the costs as the disease was rampant only in poverty-stricken area having very little market otherwise. If you were the CEO, then- (a) identify the various actions that you could take; (b) evaluate the pros and cons of each of your actions. -
2015 · Q10 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. There is a disaster-prone State having frequent landslides, forest fires, cloudbursts, flash floods and earthquakes, etc. Some of these are seasonal and often unpredictable. The magnitude of the disaster is always unanticipated. During one of the seasons, a cloudburst caused devastating floods and landslides leading to high casualties. There was major damage to infrastructure like roads, bridges and power generating units. This led to more than 100000 pilgrims, tourists and other locals trapped across different routes and locations. The people trapped in your area of responsibility included senior citizens, patients in hospitals, women and children, hikers, tourists, ruling party's regional president along with his family, additional chief secretary of the neighbouring State and prisoners in jail. As a civil services officer of the State, what would be the order in which you would rescue these people and why? Give justifications. -
2015 · Q11 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. You are heading a district administration in a particular department. Your senior officer calls you from the State Headquarters and tells you that a plot in Rampur village is to have a building constructed on it for a school. A visit is scheduled during which he will visit the site along with the chief engineer and the senior architect. He wants you to check out all the papers relating to it and to ensure that the visit is properly arranged. You examine the file which relates to the period before you joined the department. The land was acquired from the local Panchayat at a nominal cost and the papers show that clearance certificates are available from the two of the three authorities who have to certify the site's suitability. There is no certification by the architect available on file. You decide to visit Rampur to ensure that all is in order as stated on file. When you visit Rampur, you find that the plot under reference is part of Thakurgarh Fort and that the walls, ramparts, etc., are running across it. The fort is well away from the main village, therefore a school here will be a serious inconvenience for the children. However, the area near the village has potential to expand into a larger residential area. The development charges on the existing plot, at the fort, will be very high and the question of heritage site has not been addressed. Moreover, the Sarpanch, at the time of acquisition of the land, was a relative of your predecessor. The whole transaction appears to have been done with some vested interest. (a) List the likely vested interests of the concerned parties. (b) Some of the options for action available to you are listed below. Discuss the merits and demerits of each of the options: You can await the visit of the superior officer and let him take a decision. You can seek his advice in writing or on phone. You can consult your predecessor/colleagues, etc., and then decide what to do. You can find out if any alternate plot can be got in exchange and then send a comprehensive written report. Can you suggest any other option with proper justification?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · GS IV · 10 marks
Explain how ethics contributes to social and human well-being
Probity in Governance
Ethics is the inner standard of right conduct when law is absent or easy to dodge. Social well-being needs trust, fairness, compassion and civic virtue, which ethics supplies cheaper than police. Human well-being needs dignity, integrity, empathy and self-control, not only income. Professional and environmental ethics turn skill into care for people and for the next generation. Without ethics, society spends more on force and the person lives with a damaged conscience.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · GS IV · 10 marks
Why should impartiality and nonpartisanship be considered as foundational values in public services, especially in the present day socio-political context? Illustrate your answer with examples.
Probity in Governance
Impartiality is equal treatment by law and facts; non-partisanship is service to the Constitution rather than to a party. They are foundational because every other skill becomes a tool of faction if they are missing. Today’s socio-political heat — identity, social media, coalitions and punitive transfers — makes them both harder and more necessary. Illustrations include election duty, communal policing, welfare lists, recruitment and disaster camps. Conduct Rules, speaking orders, RTI and stable tenure are the practical supports.
Q2(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · GS IV · 10 marks
What do you understand by the terms 'governance', 'good governance' and 'ethical governance'?
Ethics and Human Interface
Governance is the process of steering public and related power, wider than the cabinet alone. Good governance is a quality standard: rule of law, participation, transparency, equity, efficiency and accountability. Ethical governance tests ends and means by honesty, impartiality, compassion and constitutional dignity. Efficiency at harm is not ethical; private kindness inside a corrupt system is not ethical governance either. A civil servant must join process, performance and conscience.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.