Revision summary
Parents pulling children from a Dalit-cooked midday meal is caste practice, not a hygiene footnote. Do not sack the cook or open a second kitchen; keep the meal running and eat it in public. Mobilise same-community peers, teachers and the department so attendance rules do not kill the scheme. Article 17 and the atrocities law back dignity; use them with facts. Every group — parents, elders, teachers, Panchayat, district — has a duty to keep the school open as one republic at lunch.
Model answer
Introduction
A child’s plate has been turned into a caste test. If the school dies, the poorest child loses food and letters together. As Sarpanch I will not restore attendance by sacking a Dalit cook to please a prejudice.
Body
Stakeholders
- Children who still eat, children who are kept away, and the Dalit cook whose dignity is on the line.
- Higher-caste parents, Dalit families, teachers and the Headmaster.
- The midday meal scheme, which is a legal nutrition right, not a club lunch.
- You as Sarpanch, the Panchayat, revenue and education officers, and community elders.
Values
- Equality (Articles 14, 15, 17). Untouchability is abolished; a plate is not a temple from which a cook can be cast out.
- Right to food and education of every child.
- Courage with persuasion: a sarpanch who only lectures will lose the school; one who only surrenders will lose the Constitution.
(a) Feasible strategies
- Keep the cook. Removing her is the one strategy that looks easy and teaches caste that it still owns the kitchen.
- Keep the kitchen open every day. A closed meal is a victory for the boycott.
- Immediate: visit homes with a teacher, an ANM, and a respected person from the same caste groups that are boycotting, not as a beggar but as the head of the village: the meal is the State’s, the cook is qualified, the child who stays home loses food and school.
- Eat in public: Sarpanch, Headmaster and willing parents take the same meal, same line, photographed only if it helps and does not humiliate the cook as an exhibit.
- Separate the nutrition science from the prejudice: the menu is the same; caste does not live in the grain.
- If some parents still refuse, do not starve the children who come. Do not run a “two-kitchen” solution that re-creates untouchability in stainless steel.
- Involve the education department and the midday meal authority so that attendance rules are not used mechanically to kill the scheme while a caste boycott is on. Ask for a recorded exception and extra mobilisation days.
- If there is incitement to boycott a public scheme, treat it as a rights issue; the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 may apply where humiliation of a Dalit cook is caste-based. Use it with evidence, not as a first shout that empties the village.
- Children’s clubs, baal sabhas, and a mothers’ committee that includes Dalit mothers, with rotating tasting — dignity as routine, not as a one-day drama.
- If a rumour of hygiene is the mask, do a real, public hygiene audit and fix any true gap, without accepting caste as a proxy for cleanliness.
(b) Responsibilities of segments and agencies
- Higher-caste parents: send the child; prejudice is not a parental right over a public plate.
- Dalit families: they should not have to plead; the village owes the cook protection from insult.
- Elders and faith leaders: if they bless a boycott they own the school’s death; they must say that a shared meal is not pollution.
- Teachers: eat the meal, stop coded remarks, and teach Article 17 as a living rule.
- Panchayat and Sarpanch: budget, lighting, water in the kitchen, and a spine.
- School management committee: minutes that name the boycott as the cause of absence, so that a distant official does not blame the cook.
- District education and food departments: do not withdraw the scheme for a caste-created attendance dip without a field inquiry; support the sarpanch.
- Police and revenue: only if intimidation is organised; a heavy lathi on day one can freeze positions, but a documented threat cannot be ignored.
- Media and NGOs: amplify the child’s right, not a caste war as entertainment.
- The State: midday meal is an entitlement under national policy and Supreme Court directions in the PUCL right-to-food line; local caste custom is not a permitted exemption.
Options I reject
- Sack the cook or hide her behind a “helper” from a “accepted” caste.
- Run parallel plates.
- Wait silently for the school to close and blame “social realities”.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD BOY[Caste boycott of meal] --> KEEP[Keep cook and kitchen] KEEP --> EAT[Public shared meal] KEEP --> HOME[Home visits with peers] TWO[Two kitchens] --> U17[Recreates untouchability] SACK[Sack Dalit cook] --> LESSON[Caste wins the school]
Conclusion
The conflict ends when the Dalit cook stays, the kitchen stays, and parents who boycott are pressed by peers, teachers and the scheme’s officers. Every segment has a duty; none has a right to close a school to keep a plate “pure”.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
If half the children vanish, will the scheme not die anyway?
That is the boycott’s aim. Record the cause, keep feeding those who come, and pull the department in so that a caste strike is not coded as “low demand”.
-
Is a public photo of eating with the cook tokenism?
One photo is token. A daily shared line, a kept job, and parents who return is the test. The photo is only a start.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2016 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. ABC Ltd. is a large transnational company having diversified business activities with a huge shareholder base. The company is continuously expanding the generating employment. The company, in its expansion and diversification programme, decides to establish a new plant at Vikaspuri, an area which is underdeveloped. The new plant is designed to use energy efficient technology that will help the company to save production cost by 20%. The company's decision goes well with the Government policy of attracting investment to develop such underdeveloped regions. The government has also announced tax holiday for five years for the companies that invest in underdeveloped areas. However, the new plant may bring chaos for the inhabitants of Vikaspuri region, which is otherwise tranquil. The new plant may result in increased cost of living, aliens migrating to the region, disturbing the social and economic order. The company sensing the possible protest tried to educate the people of Vikaspuri region and public in general that how its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policy would help overcome the likely difficulties of the residents of Vikaspuri region. In spite of this the protests begin and some of the residents decided to approach the judiciary as their plea before the Government did not yield any result. (a) Identify the issues involved in the case. (b) What can be suggested to satisfy the company's goal and to address the residents' concern? -
2016 · Q10 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Saraswati was a successful IT professional in USA. Moved by patriotic sense of doing something for the country she returned to India. Together with some other like-minded friends, she formed an NGO to build a school for a poor rural community. The objective of the school was to provide the best quality modern education at a nominal cost. She soon discovered that she has to seek permission from a number of Government agencies. The rules and procedures were quite confusing and cumbersome. What frustrated her most were delays, callous attitude of officials and constant demand for bribes. Her experience and the experience of many others like her have deterred people from taking up social service projects. A measure of Government control over voluntary social work is necessary. But it should not be exercised in a coercive a corrupt manner. What measures can you suggest to ensure that due control is exercised but well meaning, honest NGO efforts are not thwarted? -
2016 · Q11 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. A fresh engineering graduate gets a job in a prestigious chemical industry. She likes the work. The salary is also good. However, after a few months she accidentally discovers that a highly toxic waste is being secretly discharged into a river nearby. This is causing health problems to the villagers downstream who depend on the river for their water needs. She is perturbed and mentions her concern to her colleagues who have been with the company for longer periods. They advise her to keep quite as anyone who mentions the topic is summarily dismissed. She cannot risk losing her job as she is the sole beard-winner for her family and has to support her ailing parents and siblings. At first, she thinks that if her seniors are keeping quiet, why should she stick out her neck. But her conscience pricks her to do something to save the river and the people who depend upon it. At heart she feels that the advice of silence given by her friends is not correct though she cannot give reasons for it. She thinks you are a wise person and seeks your advice. (a) What arguments can you advance to show her that keeping quiet is not morally right? (b) What course of action would you advice her to adopt and why? -
2015 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. One of the scientists working in the R & D laboratory of a major pharmaceutical company discovers that one of the company's best selling veterinary drugs, B has the potential to cure a currently incurable liver disease that is prevalent in tribal areas. However, developing a variant of the drug suitable for human beings entailed a lot of research and development having a huge expenditure to the extent of f 50 crores. It was unlikely that the company would recover the costs as the disease was rampant only in poverty-stricken area having very little market otherwise. If you were the CEO, then- (a) identify the various actions that you could take; (b) evaluate the pros and cons of each of your actions. -
2015 · Q10 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. There is a disaster-prone State having frequent landslides, forest fires, cloudbursts, flash floods and earthquakes, etc. Some of these are seasonal and often unpredictable. The magnitude of the disaster is always unanticipated. During one of the seasons, a cloudburst caused devastating floods and landslides leading to high casualties. There was major damage to infrastructure like roads, bridges and power generating units. This led to more than 100000 pilgrims, tourists and other locals trapped across different routes and locations. The people trapped in your area of responsibility included senior citizens, patients in hospitals, women and children, hikers, tourists, ruling party's regional president along with his family, additional chief secretary of the neighbouring State and prisoners in jail. As a civil services officer of the State, what would be the order in which you would rescue these people and why? Give justifications. -
2015 · Q11 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. You are heading a district administration in a particular department. Your senior officer calls you from the State Headquarters and tells you that a plot in Rampur village is to have a building constructed on it for a school. A visit is scheduled during which he will visit the site along with the chief engineer and the senior architect. He wants you to check out all the papers relating to it and to ensure that the visit is properly arranged. You examine the file which relates to the period before you joined the department. The land was acquired from the local Panchayat at a nominal cost and the papers show that clearance certificates are available from the two of the three authorities who have to certify the site's suitability. There is no certification by the architect available on file. You decide to visit Rampur to ensure that all is in order as stated on file. When you visit Rampur, you find that the plot under reference is part of Thakurgarh Fort and that the walls, ramparts, etc., are running across it. The fort is well away from the main village, therefore a school here will be a serious inconvenience for the children. However, the area near the village has potential to expand into a larger residential area. The development charges on the existing plot, at the fort, will be very high and the question of heritage site has not been addressed. Moreover, the Sarpanch, at the time of acquisition of the land, was a relative of your predecessor. The whole transaction appears to have been done with some vested interest. (a) List the likely vested interests of the concerned parties. (b) Some of the options for action available to you are listed below. Discuss the merits and demerits of each of the options: You can await the visit of the superior officer and let him take a decision. You can seek his advice in writing or on phone. You can consult your predecessor/colleagues, etc., and then decide what to do. You can find out if any alternate plot can be got in exchange and then send a comprehensive written report. Can you suggest any other option with proper justification? -
2015 · Q12 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. You are recently posted as district development officer of a district. Shortly thereafter you found that there is considerable tension in the rural areas of your district on the issue of sending girls to schools. The elders of the village feel that many problems have come up because girls are being educated and they are stepping out of the safe environment of the household. They are of the view that the girls should be quickly married off with minimum education. The girls are also competing for jobs after education, which have traditionally remained in boys' exclusive domain, adding to unemployment amongst male population. The younger generation feels that in the present era, girls should have equal opportunities for education and employment, and other means of livelihood. The entire locality is divided between the elders and the younger lot and further sub-divided between sexes in both generations. You come to know that in Panchayat or in other local bodies or even in busy crossroads, the issue is being acrimoniously debated. One day you are informed that an unpleasant incident has taken place. Some girls were molested, when they were en route to school. The incident led to clashes between several groups and a law and order problem has arisen. The elders after heated discussion have taken a joint decision not to allow girls to go to school and to socially boycott all such families, which do not follow their dictate. (a) What steps would you take to ensure girls' safety without disrupting their education? (b) How would you manage and mould the patriarchic attitude of the village elders to ensure harmony in the intergenerational relations? -
2015 · Q13 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. A private company is known for its efficiency, transparency, and employee welfare. The company though owned by a private individual has a cooperative character where employees feel a sense of ownership. The company employs nearly 700 personnel and they have voluntarily decided not to form a union. One day suddenly in the morning, about 40 men belonging to a political party gatecrashed into the factory demanding jobs in the factory. They threatened the management and employees and also used foul language. The employees feel demoralized. It was clear that those people who gate-crashed wanted to be on the payroll of the company as well as continue as the volunteers/members of the party The company maintains high standards in integrity and does not extend favors to civil administration that also includes law enforcement agencies. Such incidents occur in the public sector also. (a) Assume you are the CEO of the company. What would you do to diffuse the volatile situation on the date of gate-crashing with the violent mob sitting inside the company premises? (b) What could be the long-term solution to the issue discussed in the case? (c) Every solution/action that you suggest will have a positive and a negative impact on you (as CEO), the employees, and the performance of the employees. Analyze the consequences of each of your suggested actions.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS IV · 12 marks
(a) What is meant by 'environmental ethics'? Why is it important to study? Discuss any one environmental issue from the viewpoint of environmental ethics. (10) (b) Differentiate between the following (10 marks) (200 Words) (i) Law and ethics (ii) Ethical management and management of ethics (iii) Discrimination and preferential treatment (iv) Personal Ethics and Professional Ethics.
Ethics and Human Interface
Environmental ethics judges human use of nature by duty to other beings and to future people, not only by this year’s profit. It matters because power and markets can destroy a river faster than custom can stop them; the dam and displacement case is one test. Law is enforceable rule; ethics is the wider right, which may bind when the law is silent or too thin. Ethical management is lived fairness; management of ethics is codes and cells that support it. Discrimination is harmful bias; preferential treatment is a limited constitutional correction. Personal ethics is private conscience; professional ethics is the duty of the chair.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS IV · 12 marks
Given are two quotations of moral thinkers/philosophers. For each of these bring out what it means to you in the present context. (a) "The weak can never forgive; forgiveness is the attribute of strong." (10) (b) "We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light" (10 marks).
Moral Thinkers and Philosophers
Forgiveness is the choice of someone who could retaliate and does not need revenge to remain whole. It is not a command that victims of grave crime hug offenders; justice can come first. In public life, strength is a firm file without spite, and peace after law, not a blood feud. Fear of the light is adult refusal of truth, RTI, science and dissent. The tragedy is punishing the lamp; administration should default to openness, not to a locked cupboard.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS IV · 12 marks
(a) "A mere compliance with law is not enough, the public servant also have to have a well developed sensibility to ethical issues for effective discharge of duties" Do you agree? Explain with the help of two examples where (i) an act is ethically right, but not legally and (ii) an act is legally right, but not ethically. (10 Marks) (b) How do the virtues of trustworthiness and fortitude get manifested in public service? Explain with examples (10).
Probity in Governance
Legal compliance is a minimum; ethical sensibility is needed where the section is silent or a paper lie looks complete. An act can be ethically right and legally incomplete, as in a narrowly recorded rescue in a disaster. An act can be legally regular and ethically wrong, as in paying a technically perfect false muster. Trustworthiness is being reliable in figures, promises and impartiality. Fortitude is lasting courage to record a lawful no; together they make public service more than a Gazette.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.